I watched "friends" for the first time tonight and the "friends" were watching a naked person across the street and then later one of the "friends" is seen by the rest of the "friends" sitting naked with the naked person across the street. How can anyone watch that show in good conscience? Rupert.
"Friends" = Diet Seinfeld
Poster criticizes Friends for a scene involving nudity and claims it copies Seinfeld's "The Contest" episode, but others note the shows handled similar plots differently.
apples & oranges
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Interesting.
I wonder when that particular Friends episode was written, because it
sounds very much like one of the subplots in "The Contest".
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[email]
(Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE* I am not responsible for equipment damage due to reeeealy
dumb children with no parental supervision, and access to a hammer.Dave wrote:
It wasn't like "The Contest" at all. The guy across the street was a nudist know as "Ugly Naked Guy". Ugly Naked Guy was moving out, the Friend in question was trying to get him to give him his apartment by pretending that he shared his lifestyle.
<<It wasn't like "The Contest" at all. The guy across the street was a nudist know as "Ugly Naked Guy". Ugly Naked Guy was moving out, the Friend in question was trying to get him to give him his apartment by pretending that he shared his lifestyle.
NO not THE contest, he was talking about how kramer george and jerry watch the naked woman accross the street and later they see kramer with her!!!!!
Yeah. I mean how much more of a blatant rip off is that? apples and oranges? gimme a break. Rupert.
CompuDroid wrote:
I know what you mean, but there's still a difference. The Seinfeld joke was about how these guys were all hot for her, she was naked, and finally Kramer gave in, and everyone seeing him with her brought the whole episode to a climax.. In Friends, it was just about a scheme to get the guy's apartment, and it was only a minor part of the episode anyway.
To clarify:
My "Apples & Oranges" comment was meant to say "Friends" (although enjoyable) is not in the same league as Seinfeld.
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Sorry for the confusion.
who was the winner of the contest? i always thought that both jerry and george gave in at the same time for that girl. In the scene where everyone is sleeping both jerry and george are awake. In the finale george says he cheated so i just asuumed that tipped the tie so jerry won but then i read a faq that said that george won, so whats the deal?
-compudroid
It's my take that initially, within the context of the episode, George won because Jerry headed over to the window to watch the naked girl across the street after Marla the virgin walked out on him. Later, they showed Jerry sleeping soundly which, as we saw after both Kramer and Elaine bowed out, was an indication that Jerry was no longer 'Master of his Domain'. So George 'won' the contest. Several months later, in "The Puffy Shirt", George confided in his boss at the hand modelling agency that he won the contest. There was still some doubt, as George was certainly not above lying in order to make himself look better in front of a prospective employer, but it still appeared as though George was the rightful winner. Then, of course, in the final episode as the plane is about to crash, George tells the gang that he cheated in the contest. Mystery solved: Jerry won. We can only assume that they *both* 'cheated', but Jerry cheated first.
BTW, which FAQ did you read?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[email]
(Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE* I am not responsible for equipment damage due to reeeealy
dumb children with no parental supervision, and access to a hammer.<<It's my take that initially, within the context of the episode, George won because Jerry headed over to the window to watch the naked girl across the street after Marla the virgin walked out on him. Later, they showed Jerry sleeping soundly which, as we saw after both Kramer and Elaine bowed out, was an indication that Jerry was no longer 'Master of his Domain'. So George 'won' the contest. Several months later, in "The Puffy Shirt", George confided in his boss at the hand modelling agency that he won the contest. There was still some doubt, as George was certainly not above lying in order to make himself look better in front of a prospective employer, but it still appeared as though George was the rightful winner. Then, of course, in the final episode as the plane is about to crash, George tells the gang that he cheated in the contest. Mystery solved: Jerry won. We can only assume that they *both* 'cheated', but Jerry cheated first.
BTW, which FAQ did you read? >>
one thing still doesnt make sense, those scenes looking into their bedrooms were private and they would have no reason to stay up if they cheated so they really shoula made one of them fall asleep,
i still think jerry and geroge gave in at the same time to the girl but george also gave in one time in the past which made jerry the winner
-compudroid
Maybe after George cheated, his conscience was keeping him awake.
Ollie
Ollie,
Lest you forget . . .
Don't you recall the episode when George boasts he is such a good liar (and cheat) that Jerry asks him for a way to *beat* a police lie detector? "Conscience" was the one thing George never let get in his way.
JG
Oliver Broadway wrote in message news:[email]...
bedrooms
they
[email] (CompuDroid) wrote:
George won - he mentions it in "The Puffy Shirt"...
"There's no problem with that - I've won a contest..."
- Buffy, Lady of Buffdom, Duchess of Buffonia, I am in awe. I completely renounce spandex.
But he admitted he lied about winning in the final episode.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[email]
(Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE* I am not responsible for equipment damage due to reeeealy
dumb children with no parental supervision, and access to a hammer.Dave wrote:
Actually he said he "cheated". I always wonder why they used that word instead of "lied". Could that mean he had sex so he did not masturbate? Therefore he "cheated" but did not "lie". ... I know, I know, I need a life!
Maybe he meant he cheated when he came into Jerry's and said he was still "Lord of the Manor"?
Great. If you go off and get a life, then what the hell am *I* supposed to do?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[email]
(Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE* I am not responsible for equipment damage due to reeeealy
dumb children with no parental supervision, and access to a hammer.<<<<Maybe he meant he cheated when he came into Jerry's and said he was still "Lord of the Manor">>>> <<<< I know, I know, I need a life!>>>> <<<<Great. If you go off and get a life, then what the hell am *I* supposed to do?>>>> -----------------------------------------------
Sounds like you two have a pact.
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
The News Guy(Mike) wrote:
But would sex count as cheating? There was no rule established, and if I recall, Jerry and George both thought Jerry would shortly be having sex with Marla. I took his claim that he cheated to mean he lied about not masturbating. Cheating means not playing by the rules, and the only rule they set was no masturbating.
In article , "The News Guy(Mike)" wrote:
word instead of
Therefore he "cheated"
Maybe he used saltpeter?
is there any way to tell who won between george and jerry judt by watchin "the contest"?
-compudroid
CompuDroid wrote:
No, It is very ambiguous. People have interpreted it either way. It is clear they both "gave in" but there does not seem to be a way to decide who held out longer.
Dave wrote in message ...
watching
seen by
Actually, no it doesn't. And the original poster mangled the show in the first place.
I didn't mangle anything. I saw what I saw. "Friends" is just a mangled version of "Seinfeld", in the first place. Rupert.
In article , Pupkin 81 writes
Also, anyone seen the significant similarities between 'The Marine Biologist' and the episode of Friends where Joey poses as Dr Drake Romoore, and there's a scene in the restaurant exactly like the seen on the beach in the above mentioned Seinfeld episode.
Seinfeld has definately influenced Friends. Friends must be big admirers. Off the top of my head, Maggie Wheeler (Janice) and wench from 'The Airport' who plays Phoebe's son's girlfriend have been in both shows. Just a quick point, I remember there being more, but I just can't think of any at the moment.