"What you think is irrelevant. Prepare to be Tholed."
Jan 10, 2003, 7:17 PM ET209 posts by 30 postersalt.tv.beavis-n-butthead
209 posts
"D.G. Porter" wrote in message news:[email]...
What the hell is that crap?
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 07:19:49 -0500, "KingTurd" wrote:
I don't know either, butt it wasn't as sucky as what happened to me this morning, I was taking a shower and I looked down and all I could see was this enormous fat uh, belly, it like totally hid my schlong, I yelled out "OH DEAR LORD I TURNED INTO A MIDDLE AGED FAT DORK!". Then I had a pizza for breakfast.
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 13:05:02 -0500, Ralph the Rover wrote:
Aarrgghh!
That's a very disturbing image. >:o\
Next time, may I suggest drinking a beer with the pizza, it will hlep put those concerns out of your mind.
CB
Classic pontification. Prepare to be Tholed.
What you took is irrelevant. Prepare to be Tholed.
What you had for breakfast is irrelevant. Prepare to be Tholed.
Non sequitur.
Non sequitur.
What you suggest is irrelevant. Prepare to be Tholed.
Non sequitur.
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:31:35 GMT, "D.G. Porter" wrote:
What is "Non sequitur"? Is that those little candies that are glued to the paper that looks like it came out of an adding machine?
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 17:21:41 -0500, CyberButt wrote:
Send me the URL for beer. Email me. ;-)
"> >
Sorry to hear you lost your schlong. I've misplaced mine, but I usually found it, in my hand. Ever heard that Detachable Penis song? It rules. That King Missile dude (I think we're related or something) found his schlong next to a broken toaster oven on the street. Maybe you should look there.
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:52:02 -0500, "KingTurd" wrote:
Yeh, that video weirds me out, because I was on that exact street once, I think it's in NYC or something, and all these people had stuff for sale on the sidewalk, I bought a book or something from this nice old lady, then later I looked at the pictures.
"Ralph the Rover" wrote in message news:[email]...
look
Did the nice old lady have any schlongs for sale?
I get this email that says it can help you with that problem. Not by making your stomach smaller, though. Mheh, heh, heh!
I get that email like every day. There's like seven of them every time I look at my spam folder. You can have one if you want.
I yelled out "OH DEAR LORD I TURNED
Yeah, there was one day where I was like, "Aaagh! I'm a dork! Oh, noooo!" Then I was like, "Oh, well. Maybe I should have some nachos."
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:59:12 GMT, [email] wrote:
You get those too? I thought they had singled me out for humiliation.
Nachos RULE!
Dave Tholen is on the faculty of the University of Hawaii at Manoa. He is also a complete nutburger. If we can engage him here we'll all have some fun.
"> >
Like, kick him in the nads, and bring him to me. He's not man enough to hang out here. He sucks. Wuss.
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:36:27 GMT, "D.G. Porter" wrote:
We don't want "fun". We want to score with large-breasted sluts!
"> > What the hell is that crap?
Is he, like, here? If I 'engage' him, and hes not here, like, how would he know? Wait.....I'm not going to 'engage' some dude!
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:36:27 GMT, "D.G. Porter" wrote:
I heard if you like, go to Hawaii, the chicks there will lei you.
"Ralph the Rover" wrote in message news:[email]...
Woah! I'm there dude. As long as some buttknocker doesn't come running up trying to put flowers on a string around my neck...what are those damn things called?
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:50:40 -0500, "KingTurd" wrote:
Hehe, maybe you will see Whamee and Laurie there, they will explain the native rituals to you.
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 00:17:31 GMT, "D.G. Porter" wrote:
Is that like star trek or something? It was too confusing!
Heh-heh, David Tholen, Internet Kook of the 20th Century, was an astronomer. David Tholen, Internet Kook of the 20th Century, was an internet troll. And now, David Tholen is -- A BORG! And he's about to find out -- that being a Borg -- can be very Kooky! David Tholen is -- THOLEN of BORG! Rated PG-13.
"D.G. Porter" wrote in message news:[email]...
Uhhhhhh...this sucks, change it....
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 05:38:02 -0500, "KingTurd" wrote:
Aw, gee, don't you think star trek is the greatest thing ever?
JUST KIDDING!!!
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:34:59 GMT, "D.G. Porter" wrote:
I took out "rec.music.classical" even though it had "ass" in it.
David Tholen is --
I think the horse is not only dead, but also buried and decomposing.
"spauldingae" wrote in message news:YTvV9.7227$kH3.1723@sccrnsc03...
Cool. Can I poke it with a stick?
"KingTurd" wrote in message news:UbwV9.651$[email]...
Careful, that may be construed as antagonism...
KingTurd writes:
You're presupposing the existence of some dead horse.
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:13:58 GMT, tholen tholed:
Oh, shut up, tholen.
dizzy writes:
How does one allegedly "thole" when posting, dizzy?
Practice what you preach, dizzy.
wrote in message news:G8GV9.115991$[email]...
Yeah, that's just Tholen outside of his Borg suit.
[email] wrote in message news:...
Correctly so. No surprise that you would fail to spot a common analogy, tholen.
Kev writes:
On what basis do you make that claim, Kev?
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
[email] wrote in message news:...
On the basis of the claim's correctness, tholen. Do try to keep up.
On your part, tholen. Meanwhile, you continue to fail to give permission for King Turd to "poke it with a stick". Fearing the outcome of King Turd's autopsy, are you?
Kev writes:
Classic illogical circular reasoning.
How does one keep up with a circle, Kev?
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Irrelevant, Kev.
You consider a poke with a stick to be an "autopsy", Kev? Gad.
[email] wrote in message news:...
Par for your course, tholen.
What alleged "circle", tholen?
"Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim." <--Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, courtesy of tholen.
You'd better tell King Turd that. He's waiting, tholen.
"Gad" is irrelevant. Prepare to be Tholed.
I'm going to poke all of you bungholes with a stick. Then kick you in the nads.
KingTurd writes:
Who are the alleged "bungholes" here?
wrote in message news:7a8W9.124719$[email]...
Anyone who attempts to elicit diatribe involving this Tholen dude in alt.tv.beavis-n-butthead. Bunghole. I have reviewed the evidence and I find the allegations to be substantiated. I sentence you to having your tweeter sawed off. Ralph the Rover, fetch me my chainsaw.
I agree...that Thole stuff is so gay, it just makes me want to redecorate my whole house. eheheheh
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 16:55:12 GMT, Argy wrote:
Beware, lest ye be tholenized.
dizzy writes:
There is no such thing, dizzy.
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 21:02:54 GMT, tholen tholed:
On what basis do you make that claim, tholen?
dizzy writes:
How does one allegedly "thole" when posting, dizzy?
On the basis of reality, dizzy.
In article , wrote:
Ye hath been tholenized, alas.
Matthew H. Fields writes:
You're erroneously presupposing that such a thing exists, Fields.
In article , wrote:
QED
Matthew H. Fields writes:
Since when does pontification equal proof, Fields?
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:51:10 GMT, tholen tholed:
Classic circular reasoning.
dizzy writes:
How does one allegedly "thole" when posting, dizzy?
Note: no response.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
dizzy writes:
How does one allegedly "thole" when posting, dizzy?
Note: no repsonse.
Classic unsubstantaited and erroneous claim.
substantiated.
And do it while wearing a dress. Wait....maybe then I could score with Jeni....that would rule
Argy writes:
What makes dizzy's misuse of a word "so gay"?
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 16:55:12 GMT, Argy wrote:
Yeh, yeh, put up some posters of the olsens, and some poodle wallpaper and uh, a big screen tv for watching mens sports.
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 07:36:33 -0500, "KingTurd" wrote:
Here you go, sir!
## ________ ~ ~
##88//--/ \ \ ' ` ' ~
## // / \ \************************
|| | | | / / *
|| | %% / / / o *
&\\/ %% / / / *
\=====/**************************
~ ~ ~
' `KingTurd writes:
And who might they be? One D. G. Porter?
Ambiguous.
Which allegations?
My loudspeakers are irrelevant to this discussion.
Non sequitur.
wrote in message news:2gjW9.129354$[email]...
Uhhhh...you suck.
The allegations that you suck. Uhhhh...you suck.
Uhhhh...you suck. And so do your loud speakers.
Uhhhh...you still suck.
KingTurd writes:
Non sequitur.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
Non sequitur.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
You have proven that you suck more than anything that has sucked before.
Again, you have proven that you suck more than anything that has sucked before.
You have again proven that you suck more than anything that has sucked before.
Ok, since you obviously lack the logic to understand the obvious, allow me to spell it out for you. You suck.
You have, as usual, and as expected, proven that you suck more than anything that has sucked before.
KingTurd writes:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
You're responding to yourself. Count the levels of indentation.
Note: no response.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Rather ironic, coming from the person who identified himself as someone who sucks. See above where he responds to himself.
Classic rebuttal from someone who sucks.
Yep, you suck.
Hmm, still sucking, after all this time, and repeating statements that suck as well.
Classic rebuttal from one who sucks.
Responding to statements that suck, sucks.
I only talk to myself, not type.
This sucks.
KingTurd writes:
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
You're erroneously preuspposing that my statemens suck.
I see that you now removed the evidence of you responding to yourself. No surprise there, really.
Then why engage in it?
Evidence tampering. Like that dude who framed OJ.
Response to self...this Tholen dude sucks too. And so does that chick at 7-11 who tried to overcharge me for nachos. They're only $1.29, beeotch.
You said "engage"....
KingTurd writes:
Is that an admission?
Why?
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
Irrelevant.
Also irrelevant.
So what?
wrote in message news:pJHW9.135348$[email]...
Yes. I gave him the bloody glove.
See previous, the contents of which was snipped.
Classic rubber-stamp response from someone who sucks.
Classic rubber-stamp response from someone who sucks.
Relevant. She was trying to charge me $1.49. I needed that $.20 for a BlueWackadoo slushie. Again, classic rubber-stamp response from someone who sucks.
engage- verb - to (cause to) fit into and move together. uhh huhhuh huh
KingTurd wrote:
It didn't take you long to get tholen figured out...
dizzy writes:
You're erroneously presupposing that he has me figured out, dizzy.
wrote in message news:SivW9.131504$[email]...
suck
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
from
where
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
There's nothing more entertaining that watching Tholen talk to someone called KingTurd.
">
Nothing. So why does this Tholen guy invade an intellectual ng such as alt.tv.beavis-n-butthead with his useless drivel? I ask this myself.
Nothing. Tholen sucks.
Glad you are enjoying the useless bantor. Allow me to formally introduce myself to you...uhhhh..hows it goin, classical music dude? I'm KingTurd, like, nice to meat you. Any hot chicks on here? Hey baby, like, you must have a miror in your pocket, cause I can see me in your pants...mhehe.. :if I had something better to do than responding to Tholen's useless crap while enjoying a big plate of nachos and a beer, I'd be doing it..but since I dont, I guess I will.. Nachos rule. Tholen sucks.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 18:34:03 -0500, "KingTurd" wrote:
Tholen's the resident kook in r.m.c., among other newsgroups.
dizzy writes:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 03:34:20 GMT, tholen tholed:
You're a kook, tholen.
dizzy writes:
How does one allegedly "thole" when posting, dizzy?
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
[email] wrote:
I AM NOT A KOOK! AND I'M NOT A DOUCHE EITHER! I'M GOING TO MY PRIVATE "PANIC ROOM" AND CALL THE POLICE ON YOU GUYS! STOP ANTAGONIZING ME! I'M NOT A DOUCHE!
"THERE HE IS, 'THE BIGGEST DOUCHE IN THE UNIVERSE'..."
dizzy writes:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 02:17:40 GMT, [email] wrote:
Tholen, you kook. You already replied to that post of mine.
Still suffering from computer operation problems, I see.
dizzy writes:
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
Irrelevant, dizzy, given that I had not already replied to the reposting of that article.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Let that be the last word.
KingTurd writes:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
You're responding to yourself, KingTurd.
Note: no response.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
KingTurd writes:
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 07:36:33 -0500, "KingTurd" wrote:
Oooo, ooooh, can I watch????
CB
wrote in message news:7a8W9.124719$[email]...
I see you've found some more new "friends," Tholen. Have fun!
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 22:56:31 -0500, "KingTurd" wrote:
Do those pasty-faced momma's boys even have nads?
Kev writes:
Non sequitur; the reference was to your illogical circular reasoning, Kev.
The one you just used for your reasoning, Kev.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Irrelevant, Kev.
On what basis do you make that claim, Kev?
Why, Kev?
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 08:22:31 GMT, [email] wrote:
What the hell is this crap????
These are the Feministrious Tubloidial Butt-noids. They crawl up peoples' butts and go exploring. I think they can see in the dark, like bats. Some kind of Bung-snoidial Butt-snoid.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 02:09:46 GMT, "D.G. Porter" wrote:
I AM THE GREAT CORNHOLIO!!! I NEED TP!!! TP FOR MY BUNGHOLE!!!
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 13:59:03 -0500, Ralph the Rover wrote:
Are you threatening me?
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:11:17 -0500, CyberButt wrote:
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
What the hell is invective, anyway?
:-D
It's like when you get a zit and pus runs out, or something.
"I am Tholen of Borg. Prepare to be 'stood up to'." "I am Drunk of Borg. Resistance is floor tile."
Its like, when you get a cut and you pour gatorade on it and it gets all red and puffy a few days later.
CyberButt writes:
It's the same old antagonism from Kev, Porter, grantco, Wehrung, dizzy, Beck, Fields, et al.
[email] wrote:
I am the very model of a modern musicologist. My work is like a cross between detective and proctologist. I spend my time with palimpsests and manuscripts unknowable, And turn them into something that is arguably showable.
(He spends his time with palimpsests and manuscripts unknowable, And turns them into something that is arguably showable!)
My livelihood requires a pedantic personality, Especially when working with notation in modality. With charts and graphs I try to show elisions in a Webern row, Pretending all the while these are important things you ought to know.
(With charts and graphs he tries to show elisions in a Webern row, Pretending all the while these are important things we ought to know!)
I know my Bach, my Perotin, my Ligeti and Martinu. I'm steeped in all details of strange arcana and minutia too. I'm long of wind and ponderous and always have a lot to say, And after five long minutes you'll all wish I'd simply go away!
(He's long of wind and ponderous and always has a lot to say, And after five long minutes we'll all wish he'd simply go away!)
Discerning the intentions of composers quite anonymous: A time-consuming challenge for your musical Herodotus. It's often quite analagous to being a phrenologist. And I'm the very model of a modern musicologist!
(It's often quite analagous to being a phrenologist. And he's the very model of a modern musicologist!)
It's no surprise to learn that modern music is political, Especially in matters that are wholly analytical. Dodecaphony, new-age jazz, or minimal tonality Are topics that can cause a sudden outbreak of insanity.
(Dodecaphony, new-age jazz, or minimal tonality Are topics that can cause a sudden outbreak of insanity!)
I spend too many hours at my keyboard writing articles Concerning tone-row theory with accompanying charticles. I ponder at the meaning of a flyspeck or a pencil dot And levels of relation in a large orchestral polyglot.
(He ponders at the meaning of a flyspeck or a pencil dot And levels of relation in a large orchestral polyglot!)
I'm master of the fauna found in sound epistemology Essential for a masterwork in modern musicology. To juggle all these animals requires a brave zo�logist, And I'm the very model of a modern musicologist!
(To juggle all these animals requires a brave zo�logist, And he's the very model of a modern musicologist!)
I wonder at Pierre Boulez in all his quaint banality, And marvel at the silliness in Stockhausen's redundancy, And Partch in his hilarity, and Riley in his majesty, And Feldman's quiet vanity, and Corgliano's tragedy.
(And Partch in his hilarity, and Riley in his majesty, And Feldman's quiet vanity, and Corgliano's tragedy.)
I understand the aspects of notational impurity That permeates the compositions rife with strange obscurity. With scientific methods of a mystical astrologist, I am the very model of a modern musicologist!
(With scientific methods of a mystical astrologist, He is the very model of a modern musicologist!)
With all the crude devices of an avant-garde apologist, I am the very model of a modern musicologist!
---
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 18:49:46 GMT, "D.G. Porter" wrote:
WHOA! Cool.
CB
CyberButt writes:
What is allegedly "cool" about it?
In article , wrote:
Here's the sheet music to the first line. Can you supply the rest?
G|GAGAGAGAGAGAGEC
Matthew H. Fields writes:
That does answer the question, Fields.
In article , wrote:
That'll be a no, then. Tholen has no idea how the melody of this song goes.
Matthew H. Fields writes:
I see that you still didn't answer the question, Fields. No surprise there, really.
[email] wrote:
You deny it is cool without substantiation of that claim?
So who the hell is this tholen dude anyway? Does he own a comic book store? Maybe teaches computers at the gifted class? Works for an accounting firm? Dresses up like Star-Trek characters and goes to Star-Trek conventions?
In alt.tv.beavis-n-butthead KingTurd wrote:
You said "hole."
KingTurd writes:
Irrelevant.
Also irrelevant.
Also irrelevant.
Also irrelevant.
Also irrelevant.
wrote in message news:hbmX9.3494$[email]...
Your right. Pretty much everything about Tholen, is irrelevant. Yep. Oh, and tholen sucks, in case you forgot.
KingTurd writes:
What about my right? My right what?
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
[email] wrote:
Why are we limited to logical arguments? Sometimes invective IS the only logical response, though -- in this case it is quite relevant -- youi DO suck when you post crap like this..
My understanding from the OS2 crowd is that he once moderated a newsgroup dealing with computer systems. He turned into a real control freak and got nailed constantly by flamers, and it freaked him out. Now he's obsessed with making everything "logical," and making sure that a topic never deviates from the thread title, no matter how absurd his argument gets. For example, he posts these "digests" where he cuts an pastes peoples' words, removes them from the context, and selectively comments on them so he can avoid actual addressing of any questions posed to him. He also follows them up with "analyses" which he obviously think put his "antagonists" in a bad light. He used to be ina Honolulu community concert band but obviously he's been thrown out. He's listed with the University of Honolulu's observatory (one of the Oahu campuses). It's eay to become a "Tholen antagonist" -- just question him and ask him about musoc, and try to deviate within a thread from the header. He takes it all personally as insult and "antagonism."
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 20:21:11 GMT, "D.G. Porter" wrote:
So he's under observation? I'm relieved to hear that.
CyberButt writes:
Porter is erroneously presupposing that there is a "University of Honolulu".
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 20:21:11 GMT, "D.G. Porter" wrote:
Wasn't "OS2" made by that International BM company?
I dunno dude, that was like, a lot of words. Words suck.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 21:14:36 -0500, "KingTurd" wrote:
Uh, yeah, you're right. Where I work, down at Burger World, instead of words they just have pictures of food on the cash register buttons.
Uh huh huh, *butt-on*
CyberButt
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:48:36 -0500, CyberButt wrote:
So what do you think of tholen?
dizzy writes:
How is what he thinks relevant here, dizzy?
wrote in message news:vYjX9.3173$[email]...
What CyberButt thinks is *always* relevant.
Nachos rule, tholen sucks.
CyberButt rules, tholen sucks.
KingTurd writes:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 19:38:56 -0500, "KingTurd" wrote:
People rule, scripts suck.
dizzy writes:
How does one allegedly "thole" when posting, dizzy?
Irrelevant, given that no scripts are involved here, dizzy.
In article , wrote:
Right, what tholen thinks is irrelevant.
Matthew H. Fields writes:
When facts are available, Fields. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
But Matt! FACTS are available!!! He can't present them and doesn't know what they are, but they MUST be there! Otherwise, it won't be LOGICAL!!!! "Sterilize imperfection!"
In article ,
Oh, right Vyger!
Matthew H. Fields writes:
How is that relevant here, Fields?
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:48:36 -0500, CyberButt wrote:
Have you got anything with poop?
Words rule! So do nachos. So like, in Tijuana yesterday, at The Cave on Revolution Avenue in downtown, they had a sign advertizing a "Bucket of Beaks." Chicken beaks! With free chips and salsa.
"D.G. Porter" wrote in message news:[email]...
Beaks? Free salsa? Sounds like a good deal. Were you supposed to dip the beaks in the salsa? Did you try a plate of beaks? Did they taste like chicken?
I stuck to the free chips and 2-for-1 beer. The salsa was too hot for me.
wrote in message news:ZDsW9.129900$[email]...
decomposing.
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does this have to do with classical music, Tholen?
There are no Tholens in the streets of Tijuana. Just a lot of old guys with violins, trumets, guitars, accordians, and big double-basses, coming to your table as you try to drink your beer and eat your nachos, and they, like, bug you and stuff to pay them to play for you. And that sucks, because their guitars are out of tune, and a soon as the trumpet starts you can't hear the guitar dudes, but he wants money too.
(Imagine a Sonata for Trumpet and Double-bass alone. Weird.)
So, like, we took the bus into downtown TJ, to Revolution Avenue, and there's this place there called The Cave, and it rules! Got a big pair of dinosaurs up above the door. They'll give you Coronas 2 for the price of 1. And the salsa kicks ass! But these little kids are always begging from the street and trying to sell you shit, and that sucks! And Charlie drank 4 Margaritas and ate a big shrimp cocktail without barfing.
But then, on the bus back, there were four all backed up at the border because the Instigation and Nationalization Service was checking everyone out, because some terrorists or something tried to blow up a building. Yeah, they tried to blow up a bus once but burned their mouth on the tailpipe. So they made us wait and wait, and we waited an hour and a half just to get off that stupid bus. Chingao!
So like, we missed out train connection out of Sandy Eggo, and when we got back to Fumerton it was real late, and we took a taxi, and I'm going to send that fucker George-Smirky McChimpface an invoice for our taxi, because he and that "Dick" Chainy guy made us late! And I know it's them, because they have big fat pictures of their smirking faces in the office place there where they check to see if you're an American!
When I got up there they asked me a lot of stuff that I didn't know, like who was President, and where he lived, and a lot of stupid stuff like that, but the supervisor came over and said, "Look, Mexicans know who the President is, and what the capital is called. This guy is as American as you can get." So I got through, and that ruled!
Did you eat a rubber full of drugs?
No, that's an insult to King Turd.
CyberButt writes:
It's just Kev being yet another antagonist.
spauldingae writes:
Non sequitur.
[email] wrote in message news:...
IT'S JARED!!!!!!
"D.G. Porter" wrote in message news:[email]...
news:...
Uhhh, its like anatomicly "erroneous"... or something. Heh m heh!
Malcolm writes:
How is that relevant here, Malcolm?
wrote in message news:0p7Y9.12537$[email]...
Who knows, but boy didn't you stand up to him right proud!
In article , wrote:
I like both coffee and nachos. But Bach already wrote a coffee cantata. A coffee cantata written by me would be different, sure, but how about a nachos cantata. I doubt I'd be tempted to write the sort of thing that Taco Bell would want to license, but it would be an opportunity to include the contrasting motifs "Nachos rule!" and "Tholen sucks", as a sort of mysterious bit which only folks from Usenet will understand.
Matthew H. Fields writes:
Classic antagonism.
In article , wrote:
Have you stopped posting your antagonism to nachos? Yes or no?
Matthew H. Fields writes:
Classic erroneous presupposition.
It's about time someone said something cool. If they had nachos and this Tholen guy back when Bach wrote the coffee tune, Bach would have written 'Cantata No. 12 Weinen, Klagen, Tholen Sucks, Nachos Rule.' But they probably would have stoned Tholen back then, I heard they had anti-suck laws in the 18th century.
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 06:33:49 -0500, "KingTurd" wrote:
Yeah... and his band would have played that on their sackbutts.
Yeah... back then they would have got medieval on him for being the village idiot.
CyberButt writes:
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:56:38 -0500, CyberButt tholed:
He prefers "village kook".
dizzy writes:
How does one allegedly "thole" when posting, dizzy?
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
Village idiot would be a good role for any proposed Nachos Cantata.
In the Coffee Cantata, an irate Dad-dude is scolding his daughter for her filthy coffee habit. He keeps telling her he'll deny her this and that unless she gives up coffee, and she says she'll still drink it. Until he says he'll deny her a husband -- then she appears to relent -- but the chorus says that if the husband wants to get any, he'll let her have her coffee.
So imagine this -- a Nachos Cantata, brief outline.
Van Driessen: Boys, nachos are bad for you. They're full of fat and grease and cholesterol and empty calories, m-kay??
Butt-head: NACHOS RULE! Beavis: YEAH! YEAH! THEY RULE!
Buzzcut: I AM GOING TO WEAN YOU TURDS OFF THOSE NACHOS!
Butt-head: NACHOS RULE! Beavis: YEAH! YEAH! THEY RULE! And you suck, heh-heh-heh-heh! [Buzzcut whacks him] AAAHHHH! Heh-heh-heh! Butt-head: Cool!
McVicker: Uuuhhhhhhhhhhhh, boys, you have got to give up those Nachos! They're bad for you!
Butt-head: You're stupid. Nachos rule! Beavis: YEAH! YEAH! THEY RULE! And you suck too, heh-heh-heh-heh!
Maxi Marft Guiy: I am not going to sell you any more Nachos. If you want 'em you can just dig 'em outa the dumpter.
Butt-head: Cool! So like, maybe we'll find a chicken sandwich in there too. Beavis: Yeah, and a dead mouse maybe, heh-heh!
Todd: Hey dudes, Nachos do rule. You guys are all fucked up, man.
Butt-head: WHOA! What Todd said!
Todd: And these two girls suck, but they're right about Nachos. [He pulls out a pack of Nachos and starts munching] So you guys, you need to get with the program and eat Nachos. <munch munch>
Van Driessen: Hmmm, maybe if you used organic chips and low-cholesterol cheese... <munch?> Hmmmm! Why these are quite good! <munch>
McVicker: Aaaaaaaaahhhhnd, if you don't overdo them... <munch>
Maxi Mart Guy: Hmmm, and they are one of my most popular items... <ca-ching of cash register>
Buzzcut: NO MARINE WASTES HIS BODY BY EATING THAT SHIT.
McVicker: Awww, shut up, moron. You're fired! I'm tired of listening to your stupid Marine bullshit every day anyway! <munch munch munch>
Beavis: Whoa! This Cantata turned out to be pretty cool! Butt-head: I have seen the top of the mountain, Beavis. And there are Nachos there. And it is the coolest of the cool.
[All but Buzzcut munch Nachos, because they rule -- and Buzzcut sucks]
"> -- and Buzzcut sucks]
Like tholen.
KingTurd writes:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:07:13 GMT, [email] wrote:
Question: How come Tholen keeps posting this stupid invective crap, even after we all tell him it sucks? Funk dat.
CyberButt writes:
You're erroneously presupposing that I'm posting "stupid invective crap".
What's your problem with digital audio tape?
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 19:44:23 GMT, tholen tholed:
Incorrect.
This, from the proven liar who claims that he does not intentionally misinterpret what others say. (Which, of course, is one of the many ways to thole.)
dizzy writes:
How does one allegedly "thole" when posting, dizzy?
Classic pontification.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Where is the alleged claim, dizzy?
How does one allegedly "thole" when doing that, dizzy?
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:13:52 GMT, tholen tholed:
See what I mean?
On your part, tholen.
So, tholen, you admit that you intentionally misinterpret what others say. Why do you do this?
It is itself one of the many ways to thole, tholen. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
dizzy writes:
How does one allegedly "thole" when posting, dizzy?
Note: no response.
Non sequitur.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Where is the alleged admission, dizzy?
I see that you didn't answer the question, dizzy. No surprise there, really.
Classic illogical circular reasoning.
You're erroneously presupposing that I've ever suffered from reading comprehension problems, dizzy.
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:30:11 GMT, tholen tholed:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, tholen.
You know that you intentionally misinterpret what others say, tholen.
How ironic, from the person who won't answer why he intentionally misinterprets what others say.
Of course, we know why - to evade, confuse the issue, antagonize, etc.
How is your reading comprehension problem allegedly "circular reasoning", tholen?
Wrong again, tholen. The above example is quite clear.
dizzy writes:
How does one allegedly "thole" when posting, dizzy?
Note: no response.
Note: still no response.
On your part, dizzy.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
I see that you didn't answer the question, dizzy. No surprise there, really.
Where is the alleged irony, dizzy? There is no admission, contrary to your claim. The real irony stems from the fact that you intentionally misinterpret what the dictionary says about the definition for "thole", dizzy.
How ironic, coming from the person confusing the issue by using words inappropriately.
Non sequitur, given that I was referring to your reasoning, dizzy. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
It quite clearly shows your reading comprehension problem, dizzy.
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 01:50:33 GMT, tholen tholed:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, tholen.
How ironic. Why do you intentionally misinterpret what others say, tholen?
I just explained, tholen. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
Erroneous, tholen, my usage of "thole" is not derived from the dictionary definition.
Liar. I've never used "thole" in an effort to confuse any issue.
Illogical, tholen. You couldn't have been referring to my reasoning, as my reasoning was not circular.
On your part, tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone lacking a logical argument.
[email] wrote in message news:...
Apparently it doesn't smell good, tholen. Meanwhile, where is there mention of a "problem"?
Kev writes:
What appears to you is irrelevant, Kev.
See the preceding statement, Kev. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems?
[email] wrote in message news:...
On the contrary, only what appears to me is relevant, tholen.
Classic pontification. Meanwhile, where is the alleged "problem" with "Funk dat"? Why, it's in your imagination, tholen, that's where!
Kev writes:
How is it allegedly relevant to this discussion, Kev?
Classic reading comprehension problem on your part, Kev.
Who said anything about a problem with "Funk dat", Kev?
How ironic, coming from the person who imagined a problem.
[email] wrote in message news:...
You would already know the answer to that question, were it not for your pesky reading comprehension problems. You really should do something about that, tholen.
Classic pontification, again. How familiar.
You did, tholen. Disoriented again?
On the contrary, your logic problems are sadly _not_ a product of anyone's imagination, tholen.
Kev writes:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
You're erroneously presupposing that I have a reading comprehension problem, Kev.
On the contrary, my substantiation is your failure to identify the problem.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Obviously not, Kev. The problem I referred to is with CyberButt. How ironic that you should exhibit the reading comprehension problem.
You're erroneously presupposing that I have logic problems, Kev.
Kev writes:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
You're erroneously presupposing that I have a reading comprehension problem, Kev.
On the contrary, my substantiation is your failure to identify the problem.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Obviously not, Kev. The problem I referred to is with CyberButt. How ironic that you should exhibit the reading comprehension problem.
You're erroneously presupposing that I have logic problems, Kev.
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:55:44 GMT, [email] wrote:
Kook. Replying to messages twice, again, I see...
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:55:44 GMT, [email] wrote:
Is this like your hobby or something?
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 18:58:19 GMT, CyberButt wrote:
Because he's a kook.
dizzy writes:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:12:27 GMT, [email] wrote:
Cl-ass-ic repe-tit-ive response, from someone who lacks a log.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 18:58:19 GMT, CyberButt wrote:
"I think he's starting to like you."
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 20:28:45 GMT, "D.G. Porter" wrote:
That RULED!
KingTurd writes:
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
How about something like, "Tholen Get Your Antagonist"?
Anything you can thole, I can thole better. I can thole better, and Nachos, they rule! Nachos rule, Tholen sucks! Nachos rule, Tholen sucks! Nachos rule, Tholen sucks, Tholen sucks!
In article ,
David! Put that, er... gun .. back in your pants!
Matthew H. Fields writes:
On what basis do you claim that David has a gun in his pants, Fields?
David Tholen has just inferred to the world that he has no 'gun' in his pants.
KingTurd writes:
I made no such inference.
wrote in message news:6amX9.3483$[email]...
So since you are now inferring that you do in fact have a 'gun' in your pants, are ya packing heat then? A gatt? A guage? Chrome? Grip? Nine? Jammy? Gonna pull out your strap and lay those busters down?
Tholen, straight outta Compton.
KingTurd writes:
I made no such inference.
Amazing the number of people who do not understand the difference between inference and implication.
Amazing the number of people who do not understand how not to suck.
KingTurd writes:
You being one of them.
KingTurd writes:
You being one of them.
In article , wrote:
I glance back at Tholen and he's busy antagonizing as much as possible.
Matthew H. Fields writes:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. And rather ironic to boot, coming from an antagonist.
In article , wrote:
Q.E.D.
Matthew H. Fields writes:
Yes, I just did demonstrate that you are an antagonist, Fields.
Matthew H. Fields writes:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
wrote in message news:Fnw2a.84579$[email]...
If your one of those Boring guys from Star Trek. Maybe you can hook me up with that 7of11 chick with the really big boobs. I want to like assimulate her butt.
Hung Dong writes:
What about my one? My one what?
Which ones are they?
You mean Jeri Ryan? Otherwise known as 7 of 9?
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 05:56:28 GMT, [email] wrote:
It figures this dumbass wood know a bunch of star drek trivia!
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:28:53 GMT, [email] wrote:
Classic bumhopper!
"Ralph the Rover" wrote in message news:[email]...
Classic choadsmoker!
On Sat, 01 Feb 2003 08:48:43 GMT, tholen tholed:
Responding twice to the same message is quite kooky, tholen.
Tholen's never been to Compton, he's never going to go to Compton, he's going to be stuck in Oahu the rest of his life, he doesn't have a life, he's stupid, and he's never gonna score.
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 20:46:49 -0500, "KingTurd" wrote:
Hehe those words are cool.
I think he has a "bm" in his pants.
Nah, tracing threads is like, work...and work sucks. DGP...yeah, he started all this crap to begin with. I sentence him to having his tweeter sawed off too.
wrote in message news:p8KW9.135515$[email]...
You said 'do it'..mheheh... Lying is cool. I don't recall doing any of it in this thread, butt, I'll throw out one for good measure - Tholen doesn't suck.
{insert favorite Tholen response here}
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:15:25 -0500, "KingTurd" wrote:
I SUCK!!
Tholen writes:
Another imposter, I see,
Yes. Glad that you're not who you claim to be above.
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 08:09:58 -0500, Tholen wrote:
I knew it was CyberButt all along! He is quite the mischevious one.
Yeah, he was inburrito or something. That was pretty cool, cyberbutt. Does anyone know who the hell this tholen dude is that we've been f*cking with the last few days? Wait, I ended a sentence with a pro-position. Does anyone know tholen who that we've been f*cking with? No, wait.. Anyone know who that we've been f*cking with who is tholen? Ummm..nevermind..
Does anyone know this tholen @sswipe with whom we've been f*cking? :)
Does anyone know this tholen @sswipe with whom we've been f*cking? :)
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 23:14:59 GMT, "D.G. Porter" wrote:
He's probably looking at uranus
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 22:34:31 -0500, Laurie wrote:
"That's better."
KingTurd writes:
So what?
Which is why you do it.
Having memory problems?
On what basis do you call that a lie?
Why should I alter the evidence for your antagonism?