Cause of JFK jr.'s death!!!! Mr. Hankey

Theory!!!!

As JFKJr was flying his plane, which is suprising, b/c I figured that a spoiled, parasitic yuppie such as that would be flying first class- sipping wine, getting his dick sucked, and his nuts shaved aboard a jumbo jet from Newark to Boston. Anyway as he was flying his Piper, a big piece a bird shit shaped like a giant Mr. Hankey flew into his windshield. He couldn't get it off, despite the fact that he watches Southpark and worships the character Mr.Hankey!!!

Like a dumbass, he quickly becomes infatuated with the pile shit on the windshield and starts to yell "HeidiHOOOO." The plane looses altitude, and he ignores the radio. While flying his wife, Carolyn, does not know what's wrong with his husband. She thinks that he is a whole another person. She tries to snap him out of the "Mr. Hankey" spell, but couldn't!!! Yet, suddenly, John John gets horny and wants some airborne pussy from his wife. She tries to get back but John John quickly ignores the controls so he could get some tail for his little impotent willie. While Carolyn tries to fight off the "Mr. Hankey" crazed lunatic, her sister unsuccessfully tries to fight him off as well.

In the process, John John knocks his sister-in-law out cold, and gets to work on his submissive wife while staring glamorously at "Mr. Hankey" on the windshield. Noting that he couldn't get his rock hard, and his wife is weakily kicking and screaming as she is being raped, John John notices that his altimeter is spinning out of control like a weather vane in an Oklahoma tornado situation.

In a quick flash, John John gets off of his fatigued wife and gets to the controls and before you know it, John John, Carolyn, and his sister-in-law meets the horizon. Before they hit the water, John John yells out, "Oh God, Damn You Mr. Hankey."

Thinks to the "Mr. Hankey" birdshit and John John's infatuation with the insufferable, lovable, nasty Southpark cartoon character, America mourns a spoiled, pampered, overrated, parasitic, unimportant, non-political nobody by the name of the son of the slain 35th president, John F. Kennedy, Jr.

Snap021477 opened his big fucking mouth and out came the following stupid ass comment news:[email]...

Hey asshole, I like a joke as much as the next guy, but you have lost your fucking mind. We are talking about someones family here. People are suffering tremendous loss and you come along with some stupid insensitive bullshit joke at there expense?!?!? Get real. Not everything in life is a joke. Have some respect.

DUH, guys, Mr. Hankey only comes out at Christmas or when Hollywood stars have eaten too much fiber!!!!

Maybe JFK jr. chose the wrong time to eat Fiber One for breakfast. Did you ever think about that?!

-=)Funk(=-

First of all, I am not sure what JFK Jr has to do with South Park. As a matter of fact, I don't know what JFK Jr has anything to do with anything. Royalty Shmoyalty, it took this guy, this "hero", eight times to pass the New York bar exam, y'all remember that. I am not agreeing with the original poster, Mr. Snap021477. But what I don't understand is this civility that the people posted afterwards. Showing respect for the families? I don't think that the Kennedy's are reading this newsgroup or any newsgroup for that matter. They are in mourning, and after that mourning is over, they will try to find another family member that can take over some political seat. They will not have the dashing, hunk of John John to rely upon, so they will have to buy another Kennedy into another political office. Just like Joseph Kennedy Sr. did for JFK in 1960 (Richard Nixon actually won the election, there folks).

Besides - did the Kennedy's respect your dead? Were they there to mourn for you and help your loss? No, why the hell should we be there for them?

LJ

Medusa wrote:

And I'm not sure what your anti-Kennedy rant has to do with SouthPark either, but there it is.

BTW, you might want to reset your line length for future rants. Try for closer to 72 characters than 720. Thanks.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                          [email]
          (Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE*  I am not responsible for equipment damage due to reeeealy
dumb children with no parental supervision, and access to a hammer.

Oh, pardon me, Mr. Dave. In accordance to your request, I checked my preferences for line length. It was set at 72. So, accidents may happen to other people, and for this I apologize. Please accept my apologies, oh, great one. Ye of perfection, you of all importance and we of such little significance.

Oh, kind sir of all pretentiousness, I have nothing against the Kennedys. Don't hate them, don't like them, only feel indifference about them. So there was nothing anti-Kennedy in the rant. But you are correct again, it has nothing to do with South Park, so I humbly apologize and ask for your forgiveness upon this matter.

Excuse me, I must tend to the other genius in the newsgroup, D. G. Porter. Thank you in advance for your forgiveness, LJ

Dave wrote:

Hmm. Hey, weren't you the one who read a post from me a few weeks ago, incorrectly perceived it as an insult, and then employed your personal brand of smarminess and deference in your insulting response?

Yeah, thought so.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                          [email]
          (Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE*  I am not responsible for equipment damage due to reeeealy
dumb children with no parental supervision, and access to a hammer.

On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 08:47:56 -0700, LJ Moon wrote:

Nixon WON the election, but then the Kennedys BOUGHT the presidency?

[email] wrote:

Hate to tell you, turd-boy, but Kennedy won that election. How old were you in 1960 anyway? Yeah, never mind the facts, just keep listening to the Rush-man.

On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 09:55:32 -0700, "D.G. Porter" wrote:

LJ Moon's ramblings, not mine. Not having been around in 1960, I was looking for some sort of documentation of Kennedy buying the presidency.

[email] wrote:

Oh, sorry to imply the epithet was directed your way. But then, you know that you're not a turd-boy! LJ may think he isn't either, but we know he's wrong.

"D.G. Porter" wrote:

(Psst, over here) Good one, you sure are getting that flaming down to a science, Der Geniuskind Porter. (just thought you should know that you are impressing us all, keep up the good work)

Oh yeah, what is a turd-boy anyways? Is that a term used by middle-aged men trying to keep up with the "kids?" You know just because you have the logical sense (and vernacular) of a 12-yr old doesn't mean that they are still going to hang out with you.

LJ Moon

(snip)

Just check your mirror

Bill Lynch

Geeeeez....will the two of you CHILDREN just shut the hell up? All you guys do is insult each other back and forth, and I (and I'm sure many others in here are as well) am sick and tired of your constant childish, immature bickering. Both of you may be among the elder members of this newsgroup, but instead you two act like little brats. Take it to private email and continue your stupid flame war there for all I care, but leave it out of the newsgroup.

-Toni

LJ Moon wrote:

Fine with me, my original post asked the question of what this had to do with South Park. He can e-mail me personally, but he's already claimed that he won't read my e-mail so the conversation is basically done. He is not going to prove anything to me and I am not going to prove anything to him. But I am not one of the elder members in this newsgroup, I have never claimed to be that. This guy is probably old enough, or at least he claims, to be my grandfather. Well, D.G., we can take this to private e-mail just e-mail me.

Administering Toni's request, I shan't answer another post concerning this subject matter.

E-mail me, DG.

LJ Moon

Toni wrote:

LJ Moon wrote:

Well actually- I meant elder as in, older than 21.

How about this you two- why don't you just killfile each other? That way you don't have to see each other's posts and you won't be in each other's "faces", so to speak. Just a suggestion.

-Toni

Toni, in actuality, I wouldn't mind receiving his e-mail except he's a complete snot. The first I ever heard from him was this condescending high-horse put-down out of nowhere. Anytime he truly wants to DISCUSS something and not act like his shit don't stink I'll read his e-mail. As it was, he was simply being as snotty as they come by sending me CC's of his posts here.

LJ Moon wrote in message ...

subject matter.

Thanks Lonnie, good of you.

; ' )

Covenant. A Man With Far Too Much Time On His Hands

Just to be complete, and in this threadso everyone sees it, the results of the 1960 election were:

Kennedy:   34,226,731 �
Nixon:     34,108,157

Difference: 118,574

Close but no cigar.

Hey, there are people here who don't know that Nixon did NOT win the popular vote in 1960, and part of my job in life is to make sure these lies don't get sopped up and believed. Obviously Moon has been lied to by some other person, and he should be told the truth. But I don't like his holier-than-you attitude. He sounds like he may turn into a good Republican, since none of them have any sense of humor and certainly don't like South Park. Hey, come to think of it, I've never read a post from his that actually had something to do with SP. All he seems to have done is latch on to me and troll. Maybe it's like that old Spain comix where one guy in the bar is staring at another, and the staree says, "You either want to fight me or blow me."

Hey, what's wrong with being a child anyway!? I resemble that remark!

Typical of this kid:

Actually, it's a quote from the "Can you spare a dime" episode of Beavis & Butt-head. The wino is "employing" the boys to get more "donations." "So, like, Dad, can we keep all the coins?" "No! You get to keep the pennies! And stop calling me 'Dad,' turd-boy!" I s'pose I should preface each of my quotes with the appropriate voice. It does lose a little in plain ACII.

"D.G. Porter" wrote:

First of all, who in here really cares about the logistics regarding the 1960 elections? This is a South Park newsgroup, remember? Second, you, I, and most everyone else in here knows very well that this is not the first time the two of you argued back and forth in the most infantile manner, with all the name calling and insults and all the crap. Like I said, for all I care you guys can flame each other till the cows come home, but leave it to private email because no one else in here gives a rat's ass about your pissing contest.

*shrug* Well- ya gotta grow up sometime, old man.

-Toni

I dunno. Moonie brought it up. And told a big fat lie. What if you believed that lie, and then failed your SAT by repeating it as one of your answers, never got into college, ended up at Burger World for the rest of your life, and eventually went postal? It'd be all my fault!! I just can't let that happen....

Um, no, I forgot. Can I post my Beavis & Butt-head fanfics here?

Yeah. It's the 2nd time. "And he started it, Ma!!!"

... even worse than Cartman, Kyle or Stan to each other??

NEVAHHHHHHH!

Yes, Richard Nixon won the popular vote for Presidency in 1960. That means he won the people's vote and the electoral college vote was for Kennedy. All of the congressmen and senators voted for Kennedy, apparantly not listening to their people, again. Maybe they were bought out by Jo Kennedy Sr. He wanted his sons to claim that presidency so bad.

[email] wrote:

You are 100% wrong. Even Nixon acknowledged that the popular vote went for Kennedy. You're thinking of an election about 100 years ago, dude.

WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS???? No Congressmen and Senatiors voted for Nixon or Kennedy, except in their home districts & states! Do you have any idea how the Electoral College works??? WHAT A DORK!! HA HA HA HA HA HA!

Maybe they were "drinking Canada dry"!

You're right. The last time that happened was 1888. It also happened in 1824 and 1876.

Long live the Bill Of Rights!

"Vote, or be ruled by ultracorrupt Orwellian Nazis!" -Me, July 21, 1999

Remove munist to reply.

Not a member of Friends Under Christ's Kingdom (F.U.C.K)

As I pointed out earlier, the person who wins a majority of the Electoral College is president. If you're not happy with that, write your Congresspersons.

Bill Lynch

At http://www.ipl.org/ref/POTUS/jfkennedy.html#election you can find these results:

POPULAR VOTE (1960) Kennedy: 34,226,731 Nixon: 34,108,157

Difference: 118,574

Since this thread deteriorated into LJ's mistaken assertion that Nixon won the popular vote, I want everyone to know the truth -- the 1960 election was won decisively by JKF. There have always been some Republicans who resented this, and they put out a rumor that Kennedy "stole" the election somehow. These people went nuts when Nixon was forced to resign, and they sure went apoplectic when they couldn't force Clinton from office. They felt that "their" man Nixon was denied the Presidency in 1960, that he was "hounded" from office in '74, and they were the ones who were the driving force behind electing Reagan. To hear them talk about it, this was some kind of "revenge" or "payback" for what happened to Nixon. They saw Clinton's "just being elected" as a slap in the face. That's why we had this French farce earlier this year.

Now the only reason I've gone this far, and this is the end on it, is that thre is this constant lie out there that the 1960 election was somehow "stolen." LJ's assertion was completely wrong and I don't want to let it go unrefuted, especialy since there are a lot of [cool] kids here who might not know the facts. There has been only one presidential election where the popular vote was overturned by the Electotral College, and it was over a hundred years ago. I forget who it was, Hayes or somebody. Some forgettable clown.

OK, that is IT.

D.G. Porter wrote:

Not to detract from everything else D.G. wrote (with which I totally agree), but JFK's victory was "decisive" only in the strictest sense (= determining an outcome), not in the usual conversational sense (= overwhelming). The election of 1960 was one of the closest in history in terms of popular vote, of which JFK got 50.09%.

In addition to the long-term Republican tantrums D.G. notes as having begun with this, it's pretty funny that Nixonites griped so loudly for *years*, claiming that the voting was improperly influenced by JFK's appearance, and that the election was "thrown" by the power of television. (This election has been widely acknowledged as the first "TV election.") They bitched and moaned that Kennedy won because he was better looking and carefully groomed, and we were continually told that, while TV watchers were more impressed with Kennedy during the debates, people listening on the *radio* supposedly felt that Nixon had come off better. (But they always left out the fact that Nixon didn't even have the sense to SHAVE before the debate.)

The irony is that Republicans today seem far more ready & willing to adjust their public images to take advantage of these kinds of mostly-fluff-based "marketing" techniques than most Democrats are. Republican candidates are said to employ many more "handlers," cosmeticians, and the like. (Granted, they're generally older and may need more guidance there anyway; and they still can't keep their candidates from falling off of platforms or looking impatiently at their watches -- but hey, you can do only so much with the imminently senile.)

I was just a few days short of 8 years old during the 1960 debates, but nobody had to explain it to me. That Dick Nixter dude was evil incarnate, and it just oozed from his pores. I remember, at one point -- I was walking past the TV during what must have been a fairly close shot of Nixon's face -- I remember thinking for an instant that my folks must've been watching a crime show or horror movie.

Benjamin Harrison, in 1888. It's worth noting that the man he defeated, the incumbent Grover Cleveland, was returned to office at the next election.

You and I are about the same age. If young-uns think the 1960 Nixon looks bad on a modern TV, they should have seen him on a 1960 TV!

"That image has warped my fragile little m�nd!" Nixon was pouting because Kennedy got off a good one. This would be a great image to freak out Cartman next time he watches TV!

Actually, Mrs. Cartman seems to have had that idea already. Remember the Halloween episode when she was decorating with "scary things," one of which was a picture of RMN?

(Or maybe it was Bob Dole. Nobody ever seemed sure of that here. And for all we know the two are birth-separated twins....)

(snip)

Wasn't it in Woody Allen's "Sleeper" that a terrible punishment was being locked in a room and forced to watch Nixon's speeches non stop?

Bill Lynch

Ah, so you're the one who said this. You are a stupid fuckwit, you do know that, I hope. What, did you get this gem from the mouth of John Ehrlichman in his 1973 testimony?

BTW, I don't read e-mail from you, so if you expect a response post it here for all to see just how big an idiot you are.

I understand that one of your favorite "flaming retorts" is telling people that they either sound like Rush Limbaugh or they must listen to Rush Limbaugh. I am not sure of where you live, but in Tacoma, WA, I don't know one radio station that even plays this gentleman. Maybe a few years ago, like in 1993 or 1994, this was funny. But I don't think that too many people labeled "dittoheads" are still around. I haven't even heard this guy on a radio since I left Arizona in 1995. So I don't understand your claim there, but to appease you.. good one, we are all rolling on the floor. (Just like we were in 1994 or 95) Man, that joke never gets old. Keep up the good work, D.G.

Anyways, yes, the genius of D.G.Porter, such a brilliant mind that he resorts to elementary name-calling. You got me there with the referential comedy concerning John Ehrlichman's 73 testimony, never even heard of him. Probably because I am not a Republican, do I believe in teh bi-polar Republic of which this country has become. I was merely trying to elevate the though of the original poster, Mr. Snap03443141 (whatever his numbers are). Yes, Nixon was the popular vote marginally and Kennedy was the electoral college's vote hence Kennedy was President. It was the first time, in this country, that people should have been up in arms, their congressmen and senators did not listen to their votes. It was also the first sign that in this country, Your vote don't count.

Do a little research, there D.G. You are the genius, right? At least, that is what you keep having to tell people.

Did I prove what an idiot I am to you, D.G.? Yeah, good.

LJ Moon

"D.G. Porter" wrote:

Not in this post, dude. But if the foo shits wear it.

Must've been annudder post.

Um, OK.

BWAH HA HA HA HA!!!!!!! And you think you are smahht, dude? I mean, like, I s'pose you never heard of Haldemann, Mitchel or Dean either! Dude, those 4 were Nixon's closet confidants, Mitchel was AG! Ehrlichman was testifying before the Ervin committee and he brought up that "stolen election" story. He also said that anything you find on a candidate was grist for the mill. He gave us the modern political framework of digging up dirt and hounding candidates, no holds barred. He's the one we all have to thank.

Like, dude where did you learn history??? Kennedy got more popular votes than Nixon. "They say" that some dead people in Chicago voted Democrat, but ask Richard Daley about that (use a Ouija board, he's dead, Jim).

I don't know how old you are, but I was alive in 1960 and heard all the story after the election. Even Nixon conceded that Kennedy got more counted popular votes than he did.

Yep.

(snip)

Speaking of anti-Kennedy rant:-) Perhaps Mr. Moon can enlighten those of us who believe Kennedy won the '60 Presidential election? US Presidents are chosen by the Electoral College - are you claiming Nixon had a majority in the EC? I'd also be interested to learn of any public office JFK, Jr., held or even sought. IIRC he shunned public life.

Bill Lynch

No, Mr. Lynch. That is basically all that I am claiming that Richard Nixon won the popular vote not the electoral college vote, hence Kennedy being president. If this country is truly by the people, for the people. What is the point of voting for a president, if the senators and congressmen are not going to listen to their constituents. Thank you very much for reading all the posts before posting this question.

As for John John running for Presidency or any other type of office. You are correct in JFK Jr never said that he was gong to run for Presidency or any other elected official position. There was always talk within the media that tey wish he would and that he might, (this may be a urban legend, but who knows?) He died with that secret. What the Kennedy's say in public and what they say behind closed doors are two different things. I don't think that I have to prove that point.

I don't even know what IIRC stands for.

LJ

William Lynch wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 18:33:33 -0700, LJ Moon wrote:

IIRC = If I Remember (or Recall) Correctly

Again with the Senators & members of the House. What do you think they did in 1960?

Well, DUH. Are you suggesting they're unique in that respect?

Bill Lynch

Kennedy being presiden

As I said somewhere else, the House & Senate had no vote in the matter. The House can only vote when the Electoral College is deadlocked. The Senate never votes on the President. Nixon lost the popular vote and conceded the election. LJ Moon is a troll who knows nothing about US civics. It seems, Bill, that we are trying to talk to a vacuum.

what i think is a biggest fucking joke is the fact that there is a nonstop coverage about the death of some rich kid, who was born with a silver spoon in his mouth and never gave a shit about anything in his life, and the fact that the death of an american hero, one of few people who walked on the moon(pete conrad), attracted virtually no attention from the media. Paul

Well, he didn't get to choose his family, his father was shot & killed when he was three, then his uncle was shot & killed when he was eight. You might want to cut him a little slack. Exactly what did he ever do to you, anyway, steal Carolyn Bessette from you?

Bill Lynch

may be next time u reply to my messages you shouldn't only repost part of them but coimplete messages that way nothing will be out of context. thanx PS:only you would like to have an ugly bitch like Besette, i wouldnt do her if she were the last female on earth

cyberian bear wrote:

Well now, you won't have to worry about that since she's DEAD. What did she ever do to you anyways- turn you down or what? Have some respect, will you?

-Toni

oh, i have respect, i have respect for pete conrad , a true American hero, the man who really done something for this country. i am not happy about Kennedy 's death I just dont think that it should have received the amount of attention from media that it did and that American astronaut should have got more attention

Exactly what did Pete Conrad actually DO for the USA?

Well then why don't you direct your pissing & moaning to the media instead of to us? We're not deciding what's going to be the lead article or the lead story, etc.

Bill Lynch

In article , [email] wrote:

Dumbass, Pete Conrad was the commander of the second successful mission to the moon. He did a hell of a lot more for his country than vacant-minded pretty boy that had to take the bar exam three times before he passed.

have received the amount

thank you McDonough for making my point, all Lynch can do is to insult me. He doesnt even know basic facts about this nation's history. this incident just shows how much our media needs to be controled by some independent organization. Today is one week since the coverage of Kennedy crash run almsot nonstop and i heard almost nothing about tragic death of Pete Conrad--just a short article in New York Times--quite a tribute to one of America's biggest heroes. Paul

Independent of *what*, o master of masturbation? Asking you what Pete Conrad did for the country is insulting you? Get a grip.

Bill Lynch

Your brusque nature and strong opinions make you an easy target for insults.

When I was in high school (81-85), do you know how much time history classes devoted to the "heroes of the space program"? None at all. We learned that Armstrong was the first man on the moon, and Gagarin was the first Russian in space, and that's it. Conrad's name was never uttered. Maybe if he had had decent PR people, his contributions would have meant more.

Yeah, like TASS?

No thanks.

In your eyes, anyway.

If the country cared as much about Conrad as they do about the Kennedys, then he would have gotten more than a single article, and the 9th day of the 'Kennedy tragedy' story wouldn't be underway right now.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                           [email]
          (Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE*  I am not responsible for equipment damage due to reeeealy
dumb children with no parental supervision, and access to a hammer.

How are we better off today because Pete Conrad commanded the *2nd* successful mission to the moon? I don't think the *1st* mission made the country any better off. It always seemed to me that the space program basically was a 24 billion dollar Game Boy for the astronauts - the most fun they could have with their clothes on. Hard to see how the *country's* better off because half a dozen guys were the beneficiaries of this 24 billion dollar program.

Bill Lynch

In article , [email] wrote:

American hero,

Wake up and smell the coffee Bill. The second mission was extremely inportant because it demonstrated that the first mission can be repeated and it was not a fluke. Yes, we are better off today because of the Apollo program because it demonstrated to the world that anything can be done with committed effort. The technological advances that resulted from the space program have definitely improved our lives. On another note, the space race probably played a significant role in shortening the Cold War as a result of the Russians diverting many of their resources to keeping up with the Americans. Now, you must agree that the world is better of now that the Cold War is over. Pete Conrad did more for his country as a soldier of the Cold War by risking his life getting on that rocket and get blasted to the moon than JFK Jr. did through all of his pretty boy posturing and editing a second rate, celebrity-ridden political rag. Besides, Conrad was by far a better pilot! I wonder how JFK Jr. would have handled a Harley. My bet is that he would have crashed a hell of a lot sooner than Pete Conrad. I find it ironic that the death of son of a president that had yet to prove himself is being touted by the media as a much more siginificant event than the 30th anniversary of the most important event (one of the to five most significant events in human history) inspried by his father's leadership.

Puh-lease. Shitloads of money just to see if we could repeat an experiment? Sure. The first landing was historic. The 2nd? Been there, done that.

This is real life, not a Disney movie.

Yes. And we would have enjoyed the same technological benefits if Conrad had crashed and burned. He was simply the next name on the list when they needed to put another crew together. If you really want to give credit, give it to the folks who did it first, not to those who followed.

So all the space program was was a big hole that we both dropped obscene amounts of money into, only we had more cash left over when both holes were filled. Great. We win.

Sure. And the space program had something to do with it, but Conrad's contributions were minor.

Amazing how the negative adjectives fly the instant you bring up Kennedy. "Pretty boy posturing". Dammit, JFK Jr had a lot of damned nerve being a handsome man. How dare he?!?

Yet to prove himself?? The man was assassinated.

My god, your anti-Kennedy bent is astounding.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                           [email]
          (Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE*  I am not responsible for equipment damage due to reeeealy
dumb children with no parental supervision, and access to a hammer.

Bandwidth? BTW, what's out of context?

Fag!

Thanks for the complaint, any possibility you might answer my question now - what did the dead guy ever do to you?

Bill Lynch <g>

PLEASE IGNORE MY POST, I AM TRULY SORRY FOR WHAT I POSTED HERE ON THIS NEWSGROUP IT HAD NO RELATIONSHIP TO THE TELEVISION SHOW SOUTHPARK NOR TO THE TRAGEDY OF THE KENNEDY AND BESSETTE FAMILIES.

PLEASE ACCEPT MY APOLOGY AND ENJOY THIS NEWSGROUP AS IT WAS BROUGHT FORTH HERE ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB.

THANK YOU, L.S.

On 21 Jul 1999 09:27:42 GMT, [email] (Snap021477) wrote:

I accept it.

But stop shouting. Turn off the caps lock.

Did you say something about that whining, spoiled little brat John John? I must have missed it.

I hope they find the bodies soon... I get so up-in-arms when good-looking people who are only famous because they are related to a famous dead person are missing.

----- Lone Wolf Well, isn't that cute. BUT IT'S WRONG!!!

"I'm gonna go play some D & D... in memorium." "That's touching, man." - Froehike and Langely, The X-Files

(snipped)

Your wish is granted - JFK, Jr's body was found by divers early this morning in the wreckage of the fuselage. I'm guessing the women aren't too far away (I haven't had the TV on since 7:30 am, or so, so they might already have been recovered.

Bill Lynch

William Lynch said...

They've located all of them. But don't expect it to go away overnight, there's still the mourning period and the funeral and the endless "what went wrong?" analysis that will keep the media circling around this story like buzzards to carrion for days to come... if not longer.

[email] wrote:

Well, aside from the fact that the doofus was flying WITHOUT INSTRUMENTS, AT NIGHT, IN A MOONLESS NIGHT (am I the only one who would be feeling uncomfortable with a pilot like that?), I want to know what happened. Hmmm, say, wouldn't it be "funny" is they found evidence of a bomb?? Oh, wait, the GOP loons are already saying Hillary planned it so he wouldn't challenge her for the Senatorial nomination (I kid you not).

(snip)

Way too late, Dude. I was on the case Saturday night and started the rumor that the plane was shot down by a hand held missile, e.g., Stinger. Course, that doesn't mean Hillary didn't do it or contract someone else.

Bill Lynch

Did they find John John on top of Carolyn or any evidence of shit on the windscreen? Was he half eaten by sharks? Well give us more detail man!

(snip)

Not after the crash

All I'm certain of is that he was wearing women's underwear.

Bill Lynch

Snap021477 wrote:

<snip>

Jeez.....what the hell is wrong with you? Three people are dead but instead you show your insensitive, crass nature by writing this crap. Show some respect for the dead, will ya?

-Toni

hi snap...or is it <snip>? are you talking about yourself or JFK Jr.?oh-it can't be you-America wouldn't mourn for you...(sorry-had to say it)

Don't blame me, blame Mr. Hankey!!!

Want to find a lot more of these turds? Go to places like alt.impeach.clinton or alt.fan.rush-limbaugh. This guy is acutally a light-weight. [If you're wondering why I go there, hey, I need to hone my flame skills someplace, don't I??]

Toni wrote:

Not that I condone that type of joking, but I personally am sick of all this extensive coverage of JFK Jr's death. If it were anyone else that died in a plane crash, would it make the evening news even for a few seconds? No. More proof that money talks and bullshit walks.

~Starla

(snip)

How about if Princess Diana died in a fiery car crash? <G> Or if Brad Pitt got picked up by the vice squad for playing hide the salami in a public men's room? You completely right, of course, if one of us were to die - three lines on pg. 89 (maybe). So long as the bulk of the public goes apeshit over any magazine with Princess Diana or JFK, Jr on the cover, we're going to get this.

Bill Lynch

William Lynch wrote:

Speaking of which, I couldn't (and still can't) *believe* how much more coverage *she* got at the time of her death than Mother Theresa. It's just because Princess Diana was *young and pretty*, and the way she died was so much more scandalous and "interesting". Now that was just plain wrong and disgusting.

LMAO!

~Starla

Nah, you don't have to show respect for the dead, but you've at least got to be _funny_ while you're disrespecting them. Tip: Saying "turd" or "shit" over and over again is _not_ funny.

It is when you're a disgusting little 12-year old girl who thinks she's so grown up she hangs with a 22-year old loser still in high school and you're also ugly and have a retainer.

Eh, I _suppose_.

But a little fat kid singing about Wild Wild West is funnier.

(snip)

Absolutely hilarious, especially when he's wearing the outfit & has dolls playing the Artemis & Selma Hayek roles.

Bill Lynch

Artemis Clyde Frog.

Toooo funny. :)

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                           [email]
          (Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE*  I am not responsible for equipment damage due to reeeealy
dumb children with no parental supervision, and access to a hammer.