Roger Ebert

Jun 30, 199918 posts by 16 postersalt.tv.southpark
18 posts

Ebert gave this movie **� because he thought it was "too offensive." Mr. Ebert, out of all the crude, disgusting films you've seen, why did you choose to be shaken up by this one? You liked Beavis & Butthead, but don't you realize this is much more clever and funny? South Park is a brilliant social satire, more than you will ever know. And I don't believe how you didn't get the message the film was trying to say. To quote: "All it lacks is a point to its message. What is it saying? That movies have gone too far, or that protests against movies have gone too far?" The movie is simply declaring that America is too strict and that, YES, protests against movies (actually TV if you watch the show) have gone too far. Anybody who was actually WATCHING THE FILM could tell you that. I rest my case. And BTW, I'm giving the film ****. �����������~��~����������������������~~ LeEsPaM � Some Guy

"Listen you f*ckers, you screwheads. Here is a man who stood up to the scum, the c*nts, the dogs, the filth, the sh*t. Here is a man who stood up." � Travis Bickle

Definitely ****. Definitely.

Ebert's just got a bug up his ass about the South Park movie, because he doesn't like that one of the ep titles points out that he's been eating too much fatty foods. :) Ebert's a dumbass. Critics *rarely* know the good movies, especially when it comes to comedy.

~Kyle Broslofski~� �1999, All Rights Reserved, Void Where Prohibited, Batteries....Not Included. http://www.freeyellow.com/members7/psycho-sheila/index.html

Check out Ebert's review for yourself at http://www.suntimes.com/output/ebert1/30sout.html He liked the film, and generally likes films like it -- he is just aware that the movie will never reach America's moral mainstream (the people who own the papers and advertise on his show). The **1/2 rating seems more like prudent politics to me.

Mark

Kyle Broslofski wrote:

"Quis custodiet ispos custodes?" -- Juvenal

In article ,

Yeah, he would've given it a LOT lower than 2.5 stars if he hated the movie. C'mon, this is the same guy who picked the "South Park" video releases as his video pick of the week last year on "Siskel and Ebert", in the ep that had the TV-MA rating. :-) He panned "BASEketball", and so he wanted to show the SP tapes as something GOOD that Trey and Matt have done.

But all those dumbass critics are praising SP:BL&U to the hilt.

- Juan F. Lara http://ccwf.cc.utexas.edu/~jfl/intro.html

Stan: No! Not ham, you fat fuck! Cartman: Aw, fuck you.

Juan F. Lara wrote:

Not the local critics in my area. They're all freaking out about it, saying it's evil and stuff. All the critics from anywhere but Hicktown, PA are praising it. :)

~Kyle Broslofski~� �1999, All Rights Reserved, Void Where Prohibited, Batteries....Not Included. http://www.freeyellow.com/members7/psycho-sheila/index.html

Mark Broadworth wrote in message ...

O.K. I did. One of his comments I had problems with is:

"... scenes your eyes will register but your mind will not believe, such as a USO show involving Winona Ryder doing unspeakable things with Ping-Pong balls."

Actually Winona is doing nothing unspeakable with Ping-Pong balls. Got to wonder what Mr. Ebert's mind led him to believe. Probably the same thing my mind led me to beleive but was then the movie basically turned around and showed me what a sick little f'er I am ;-). Perhaps Mr. Ebert should lay off the fatty foods and the German videos!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

Boche wrote in message ...

such as

Ping-Pong

Got to

thing my

and

lay

ROFLMAO!

- -- Stephen Hopkins PGP key ID 0xE24AA972 on public key-server or e-mail me. "It's the alien anal probe! It's shooting fire from Cartman's rectum!" SP#101

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.0.2i

iQA/AwUBN4+0ihg6aTziSqlyEQIoEwCgntAkTf2UQR8fedRVoZOybiLxvy0AoIQf RXhrBgFQrBz7jWr1FTQFzFt7 =iNpD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Bingo. While I generally think Ebert (the man who was partially responsible for BEYOND THE VALLEY OF THE DOLLS) is a good mainstream reviewer, your opinion does have the ring of truth.

Mark L. Falconer-film and video reviews at http://hometown.aol.com/MFalc1/home.html

Keyser Soze wrote...

I give Roger Ebert * because I think he is too stupid.

Roger Ebert is a big fat dick. He's the biggest dick in the whole wide world. Roger Ebert is a dick, he's a dick dick dick, He's a dick to all the boys and girls.

Ebert is a dick, Ebert is a dick.

On Sundays he's a dick, On Mondays he's a dick, On Tuesdays he's a hella-dick. On Wednesdays he's a dick, On Thursdays he's a dick, On Fridays he's a major dick. Then on Saturdays, just to be different, He's a major, two-ton dopey dick.

Ebert is a dick, Ebert is a dick. I really mean it: Ebert is a big fat d-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-ck!!!

I was looking forward to this movie. I was first in line at 1030 this morning, but I have to agree with ebert. I think it stunk. Too much singing. Most all of the jokes fell flat. Where was the creativity? Havent they done a story similiar to this on the show a hundred times already? I agree with ebert.

----- "More fun than a coloring book...more fun than a swing set..its the ebola virus happy fun page!!!!" http://www.angelfire.com/de/ebola

That sucks. Everyone should get to enjoy this flick. Try it again, but smoke a bowl first. Maybe it'll help. hehheh VIVA LA RESISTANCE!!

Maybe your right. There were just a bunch of little kids in there and I couldnt enjoy it. I will give it one more chance.

----- "More fun than a coloring book...more fun than a swing set..its the ebola virus happy fun page!!!!" http://www.angelfire.com/de/ebola

Roger Ebert is an uncle fucker

Keyser Soze wrote in message ...

choose

social

get

point to

protests

America

watch

could

scum,

In article ,

Mr.

you choose

you You know what it is? It's because he didn't lay off the fatty foods....

Lauren

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

UMMM YEAH GUY this movie is at least 10000 time cruder then beavis...do America what was that rated like a pg. 13 and park was rated R over there in the good old us of A in god father f*ck was used 182 time ummm in the song "uncle f*cka" or what ever they called f*ck was used at least 25 time and the song was only a small part of the movie. given I laugh my ass off although a little too much singing. But on the crude ness scale it was way up there and to many d*cks also (and or dildo's Sadams fake P*NIS) I am wondering if Keyser Soze ever saw the movie b4 writing this and do have to bleep my self out in these posts????

Keyser Soze wrote in article ...

choose

social

get

point to

protests

America

watch

could

scum,

In article , [email] (Keyser Soze) writes:

Ebert's the fat one, right? If so, he's probably just bitter about him being in

that one ep.

BreadBen Rainesalt.tv.southpark

Roger Ebert is a big, slow, barn yard owl. The guy shouldn't be reviewing movies, he should be sitting up on a branch somewhere looking for mice. I mean every time I see his show I keep expecting him to suddenly start flapping his big flabby arms, turn his head around 360 degrees, and start saying: "Hoot... Hoot..."