At first, I thought that "Stanley's Cup" was going to be a parody
of those "underdogs-in-sports-who-manage-to-win-the-big-game" movies.
But after seeing the end and thinking about it for a moment, I kinda
got it. "Stanley's Cup" is basically recreating one of those
"underdogs-in-sports-who-manage-to-win-the-big-game" movies from the
point of view of the rival team, as if Trey and Matt are saying, "Those
guys have a story of their own too. What about them?"
This season of SP was pretty good, but episode-wise, it couldn't
match up to what they did last season(the "Hell on Earth 2006" was my
favorite episode and I have to match the two-parter a couple of more
times to get the athiesm-in-the-future subplot). I guess T&M are
trying to keep their heads on straight after the acclaim they recieved,
that they're probably playing it safe until they could find a topic
they could really sink their teeth into.
One last thing, I'm certain that a lot of people are offended by
last night's show(and I'm certain that a lot of Australians was
offended by Steve Irwin's cameeo in "Hell on Earth 2006"), BUT NOT ME!
What's offensive to me is the delusions of a wannabe rapper who happens
to be married to an aging pop princess, a hanger-on who goes to a
clinic for her weight problem when we know damn well that she didn't
have any problem putting on the pounds when we first saw her and a
bunch of pissed-off everyday people who believe they're duped by an
actor doing a "documentary" without considering that they're set up
based on how outrageous the actor's character is.
But what do I know?"Comedy is the truth done for laughs"