southpark for playstation would rule if.....

ok, we all know the n64 has to have better graphics, so since the playstation can't out due n64 graphic wise, lets make the psx version like the show, have it come out this fall, and have a whole wack of "in show style cinemas" 50% more sound effects 90% more voices 20% more textures for more levels link up play so you both get your own screen (rent 2 or buy one and rent another to get 2 copies to do this, and link up rules by the way) 10% more models

ok, the key word here is STORAGE SPACE!!

you could have the soundtrack to chef aid played in the background, or whatever, you can have way more sounds on there and whatever.

the pc version of southpark is out in a week, and it will kick the 64's ass. the only good thing about southpark on the console is it would be a good party game, you know, sit on the couch and playand beat up some of your buddies, or whatever, but if the playstation's version doesn't add tons more, it will suck.

and the sony (to you n64 only people) it doesn't suck. think of it this way.

it came out a year before, ok??

it's like computers, the year after you bought it, claims your comp out of date. the 64 came out with newer technology so yes it HAS to be better. but games like metal gear and spyro and crash3 really show the 64's starting to get scared, i mean, 64 has 90% of it's game library are baby games, like iggy wrecking balls and mario. the only GOOD games i've seen so far, is zelda, bond and turok 1 and 2. perfect dark will be a awesome game, and yes i know the sony is starting to show it's age, but think, sony could buy nintendo 50 times over, nintendo, because it's not doing well finincially (according to what i have heard, i work electronics, so i hear things) that last year, goldeneye just took it out of a possible bankruptcy. anyway, the 64 will be beaten to death by the dreamcast, and the sony 2 will take out dreamcast, and the nintendo 2000 or whatever will come along and try to take out sony, and we have deja vu all over again, so how about this, NO SYSTEM IS BETTER, JUST GET BOTH!! cuz i do.

"there are no stupid questions, just stupid people" garrion.

I don't know why many people seem to think this. Playstation can, and in many cases has, had better graphics than N64. Take a look at Metal Gear Solid, Final Fantasy VII (which had better graphics than Zelda), and Resident Evil 2! Playstation's graphics are crisp and alive, while the '64 seems to prefer flat, smooth, bland polygons. �����������~��~����������������������~~ LeEsPaM � Some Guy

My alternate e-mail:  [email] ! !
----------------------------------------------------------------

"Thank you Grace, I think you're wrong." "Don't try any of that backslap."

Just an opinion from a non-N64-er, but I saw the back of the box for N64 Quake, and the graphics looked really bad. Very blurry like it was trying to be smooth (GLQuake-style) but failing very VERY badly.

look, i never said thatthe 64 HAD better graphics in the sense that psx sucks, the psx i think is the best system by far. metal gear solid was the best i have played in a LONG TIME. the 64 is a blury style system. but some of there games are not. and the 64 only has like 4 good games, the psx has TONS. but 64 has anti aliasing and sony does not, it' too bad, or sony would kick ass way more.

anyway, long live sony.

~me. p.s (i'm the guy who started this message)

In article , LEESPAM writes

That would have something to do with the way the N64 anti-aliases...