If Trey Parker has even ONE ball . . .

Apr 10, 2008, 4:54 PM ET9 posts by 4 postersalt.tv.southpark
9 posts
kenpisanos0183616alt.tv.southpark

No. It's NOT "old" news. Ron Paul IS news . . . just like the media blackout that inspired you to make such a stupid statement.

Rise above your network programming.

We agree. WRITE HIM IN.

=-=

Ron Paul - The High Tide:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrlIhO7bJgI

SUPPORT RON PAUL'S AMERICAN FREEDOM AGENDA ACT!!!

http://www.nolanchart.com/article3349.html

http://action.downsizedc.org/background.php?cid=82

kenpisano wrote: } He'll do a show about Ron Paul.

It's possible there is an upcoming episode about Ron Paul, for all either of us know. However, Ron Paul is no longer running for president, so to do a Ron Paul episode now would seem already out of date.

Balls has nothing to do with it; South Park has never shied away from controversy.

Ron Paul is indeed still running for president. He has NOT dropped out.

He is simply being ignored by the media in a conscious and purposeful attempt to manipulate voters. I would strongly suggest that all who believe in him or care about America demand PAPER BALLOTS and WRITE HIM IN.

=-=

Ron Paul - The High Tide:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrlIhO7bJgI

SUPPORT RON PAUL'S AMERICAN FREEDOM AGENDA ACT!!!

http://www.nolanchart.com/article3349.html

http://action.downsizedc.org/background.php?cid=82
Tim Smithkenpisanoalt.tv.southpark

In article , [email] wrote:

What do you think of his "anally rape the Constitution act"?:

<http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.4379:>

He's tried to get that passed multiple times. How come Ron Paul supporters never seem to feature that little gem?

--Tim Smith

I have read what you refer to as the "anally rape the Constitution act", and have no idea what you must think is supposed to be wrong with it.

I assume you must be a proponent of LARGE and INTRUSIVE federal control of the several states, which is a very unconstitutional, and un-American attitude to take.

I see nothing wrong with the HR 4379 IH "We the People Act", as written. It is high time the federal courts began to follow the Constitution, by recognizing both states' rights, and those of the people at large.

=-=

Ron Paul - The High Tide:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrlIhO7bJgI

SUPPORT RON PAUL'S AMERICAN FREEDOM AGENDA ACT!!!

http://www.nolanchart.com/article3349.html

http://action.downsizedc.org/background.php?cid=82
Tim Smithkenpisanoalt.tv.southpark

In article , [email] wrote:

Ever heard of a little thing called the Bill of Rights? The purpose of the "We the People Act" is to stop the courts from applying the Bill of Rights to limit State government. Essentially, it is an attempt to repeal the 14th Amendment without bothering with the procedure for amending the Constitution. (It is the 14th that makes parts of the Bill of Rights applicable to the States. Before that, the Bill of Rights was only a limit on Federal power, not State power).

If it passed, then Texas could, for example, start enforcing the provision in their state Constitution that prohibits atheists from holding elected office.

If it passed, then Utah could, if it wished, make Mormonism the official state religion, and tax or prohibit other churches.

You don't have a problem with any of that? You think it is OK that Paul wants to strip away many of our rights that way?

--Tim Smith

The We The People Act does nothing to diminish the authority of the Fourteenth Amendment. What it does do is limit federal jurisdiction, which is a GOOD thing.

Then the proper venue for such a case would be in the Texas Supreme Court, NOT the SCOTUS. The Eleventh Amendment of the US Constitution already prohibits citizens of the several states from actions against their own state in federal court.

Then the proper venue for such a case would be in the Utah Supreme Court, NOT the SCOTUS. The Eleventh Amendment of the US Constitution already prohibits citizens of the several states from actions against their own state in federal court.

Of course not. I'm already used to the way the status quo is stripping away our rights.

Seriously, though, I think we would ALL have more rights if Ron Paul were President. So sorry you don't agree.