First, my take on the episode itself.
It was an excellent show. Not the funniest thing I've ever seen, but well crafted and original. They're proving every week that South Park is rich with intelligence, full of creativity, and certainly not afraid of lampooning *ANYTHING* (from slavery to Ms. Streisand). I, personally, don't want to see a show where they *have* to get the Chef song in every week and a "really cool!" Kenny death each time to please the masses (and for those complaining that Kenny didn't get stomped by Babuda, that *was* the joke). And to those who can't stop bitching about how downhill the show is going, remember that the jokes are, for the most part, fresh and untested...some will fail and some will fly. So far, by continuing to be original (and not getting sucked into the pitfalls of writing a popular show- predictability being a big one), they're definitely headed in the right direction.
Anyway, onto what I'm posting about. I loved when Chef and Leonard Maltin are driving and they had the flat *real life* background of the trees moving behind them to simulate motion. After thinking it was just something weird that the animators wanted to do, I began to think that they were probably satirizing the commonplace use of that background in a real live show with real live people (or they were too damn lazy to animate trees).
I wonder if some people are so used to seeing that stuff on TV, that they didn't even *notice* the video background....It was on the screen so long, it would have been hard to miss, but if you were engaged in the dialogue, I could see how it would get by you. I think.
Did *anyone* miss it? Did anyone laugh when they saw it?
-Jason
If replying via email, do us all a favor and remove the exclamation point from my address