Alt Tv Rewind

UbiquitousSep 11, 2007, 5:03 AM ET

UbiquitousSep 11, 2007, 7:19 AM ET↩ Ubiquitous

FDRSep 11, 2007, 8:39 AM ET↩ Ubiquitous

Christianity is a peaceful religion as long as women aren't allowed to have control over their own bodies, boys are sexually molested by the clergy, and people, even if innocent, are fried to death in electric chairs.

UbiquitousSep 11, 2007, 8:45 AM ET↩ FDR

In article , [email] wrote:

Your weak attempt at moral relativism proves my point. Thanks.

JoelSep 12, 2007, 11:17 AM ET↩ Ubiquitous

You had a "point"?

UbiquitousSep 21, 2007, 5:56 AM ET↩ Joel

In article , [email] says...

Apparently you don't have the mental capacity to comprehend it.

FDRSep 12, 2007, 4:33 PM ET↩ Ubiquitous

I can pick out parts of the Chrstian religion that bother me in God's hateful ways.

Billy Graham and Tammy Faye Mesner got it at the end. We aren't here to judge the 'sinner', that's up to God or whoever is in charge. We're here to love one another.

BTR1701Sep 11, 2007, 6:50 PM ET↩ FDR

In article , FDR wrote:

Yep, I agree with both.

UbiquitousSep 11, 2007, 6:55 PM ET↩ BTR1701

[email] wrote:

And you would be wrong.

JoelSep 12, 2007, 11:18 AM ET↩ Ubiquitous

And your hateful spew about Islam would be "right"? All such simplistic, blanket statements about worldwide religions are retarded. On balance, though, it's undeniable that so-called Christians are far less tolerant of Islam than Muslims are of Christianity, in general. Thanks for exposing yourself as a Christian in name, only.

Anim8rFSKSep 12, 2007, 2:45 PM ET↩ Joel

In article , Joel wrote:

Including, and especially, this next one. Wait for it:

Yep, there it is.

JoelSep 12, 2007, 7:46 PM ET↩ Anim8rFSK

Anim8rFSK wrote:

You're a complete idiot. Learn how to read.

I stand by my statement. Christians, far more so than Muslims, *in general*, have a superiority complex about their religion.

Your use of sarcasm in the midst of your illiterate rant exposes you as a pitiful nerd.

Anim8rFSKSep 12, 2007, 8:38 PM ET↩ Joel

In article , Joel wrote:

Okay, now, wait for the unfounded personal attack ..

Bingo!

Now, wait for the repeat of the falsehood, as he foolishly thinks that saying a stupid unfounded thing a second time validates it ...

BINGO! Now, the follow up unfounded personal attack, since he didn't have anything to actually say . . .

Ah, the trifecta. Also, please note that at no time did I rant nor was I illiterate, but I do offer your reply a hearty PKB.

JoelSep 12, 2007, 9:35 PM ET↩ Anim8rFSK

Anim8rFSK wrote:

I thought, obviously with an excess of optimism, that restating it with emphasis on why you were such a moron, might perhaps lead you to see why you're an illiterate, opinionated buffoon.

You haven't "said" anything whatsoever, especially not to refute my statement, dweeb. But that doesn't matter, 'cause your second-grade teacher thought you were special.

Any reply that seeks to ignore context, in a vain attempt at pointing out some discrepancy that doesn't exist in the earlier post, is a rant. You're a walking rant, geek. Overdramatic, and just plain wrong. And, no one cares about a "PKB". You're a masturbator. I scoff at your ignorant attempt at dragging me into some retarded Internet argument. Your kind is boring, despite what some half-wits have apparently made you think by indulging your careless, juvenile, *illiterate* style of trolling.

Anim8rFSKSep 12, 2007, 11:21 PM ET↩ Joel

In article , Joel wrote:

No, clearly, you haven't. Not yet.

obviously with an excess of optimism, that restating it

Well, since that assumes facts not in evidence, and would mean agreeing with you, who has proven to be wrong in everything he says, that seems unlikely, doesn't it?

Your statement was self refuting. You don't need me to prove you wrong.

Wow. Somebody has some issues. And is clearly projecting all his self loathing and guilt on his betters.

BTW, "illiterate" doesn't mean what you apparently think it does.

Buckaroo BanzaiSep 20, 2007, 9:03 PM ET↩ Anim8rFSK

Ah, you should've left it with your first reply, it was perfect. I just can't believe the guy hasn't heard about Muslims killing Christians that live in Islamic countries, who won't convert to Islam.

JoelSep 20, 2007, 9:37 PM ET↩ Buckaroo Banzai

"Buckaroo Banzai" wrote:

Another illiterate wanker. Just in case you might have a brain hidden beneath your dweeby arrogance, though, do you *really* think it's as simple as you've stated?

Buckaroo BanzaiSep 20, 2007, 11:28 PM ET↩ Joel

"Joel" wrote in message news:[email]...

Well, it all depends on which century you live(d) in... if you live(d) in the 12th century, then I just might be an 'illiterate wanker' whose brain was hidden beneath a 'dweeby arrogance'. However if its the 21st century, then (god I can't believe I have to fight this- I would bet everything I had that there were no muslims in the 12th century defending Christianity like you're defending Islam...) Ah crap... why am I even wasting my time. You're right. We've oppressed Islam enough... what are your orders Glorious Leader????

UbiquitousNov 10, 2007, 3:26 PM ET↩ Joel

In article , [email] wrote:

It's called "projection" -- Look it up sometime.

Pete BSep 14, 2007, 9:44 PM ET↩ Anim8rFSK

In article , [email] says...

I believe you put forward a statement without showing your proof.

Buckaroo BanzaiSep 20, 2007, 9:06 PM ET↩ Pete B

"Pete B" wrote in message news:[email]...

It's common knowledge but if it's eluded you, here ya go. And I'm neither Christian nor Muslim.

JoelSep 20, 2007, 9:37 PM ET↩ Buckaroo Banzai

"Buckaroo Banzai" wrote:

*That* is your source?! That might as well be godhatesfags.com, for all its objectivity. Give me a break.

Buckaroo BanzaiSep 20, 2007, 11:34 PM ET↩ Joel

"Joel" wrote in message news:[email]...

TRANSLATION: "I didn't even bother to check the validity of the claims, I just saw *www.bible* and I hit the reply button.

DUDE. Get a grip and do some leg work. I know you don't want to face it, but Muslims are killing the fuck out of Christians... and yeah, we may think they deserve it, but still... (that's my attempt to bond with you by letting you know that I don't believe in God, and find Christians annoying but still believe killing them is wrong.)

If you really dispute the claims, post some proof, otherwise, anything you post will confirm it.

Wogï¿½GeorgeSep 21, 2007, 6:40 AM ET↩ Buckaroo Banzai

"Buckaroo Banzai" wrote in message news:TOEIi.54566$[email]...

I haven't clicked the link, but does the top of Jesus' head separate from the bottom? I assume so, seeing that it's a Canadian site and all.

Buckaroo BanzaiOct 1, 2007, 1:47 PM ET↩ Wogï¿½George

"Wog George" wrote in message news:xcNIi.343$[email]...

Ya know, this was supposed to be serious, but you blew that all to hell didn't you?

UbiquitousNov 10, 2007, 3:24 PM ET↩ Anim8rFSK

[email] wrote:

I believe the term you are seeking is "projection".

UbiquitousNov 10, 2007, 3:22 PM ET↩ Anim8rFSK

[email] wrote:

They're so predictible, aren't they?

Anim8rFSKNov 10, 2007, 6:05 PM ET↩ Ubiquitous

In article , [email] (Ubiquitous) wrote:

It is sort of amazing when they're that self predictive.

RickNov 22, 2007, 11:06 AM ET↩ Anim8rFSK

"Anim8rFSK" wrote in message news:[email]...

Hmm when was the last time a Christian cut of a Muslims head. While the Muslims do it all the time or suicide bomb them to death.

Antonio E. GonzalezNov 23, 2007, 9:54 PM ET↩ Rick

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:06:30 -0500, "Rick" wrote:

They're called the "Lord's Resistance Army"; a-little-too-devout enforcers of the Ten Comandments, I don't know about beheadings, but I hear their victims sometimes wish for that . . .:

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord's_Resistance_Army>

<http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/lra.htm>

<http://www.fas.org/irp/world/para/lra.htm>

UbiquitousNov 10, 2007, 3:18 PM ET↩ Joel

In article , [email] wrote:

The only "hateful spew" I've seen is coming from you. I just am stating a fact.

Too bad the facts don't support your ridiculous assertion.

Antonio E. GonzalezNov 11, 2007, 9:11 PM ET↩ Ubiquitous

On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:18:09 -0600, [email] (Ubiquitous) wrote:

Looks like *somebody* needs to start watching "Aliens in America" . . .

BTR1701Sep 12, 2007, 6:38 PM ET↩ Ubiquitous

In article , Ubiquitous wrote:

No, not really. Religion of just about any flavor is at least as destructive as it is helpful.

Antonio E. GonzalezSep 12, 2007, 9:41 PM ET↩ FDR

On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:39:16 -0400, FDR wrote:

Not even a post, just his sig . . . twice! Poor guy's gettin' desperate . . .

BTW, here's Applegeeks, a comic drawn by Mohammad F. Haque (i.e. "Hawk"; yup, a practicing Muslim!) . . .:

<http://www.applegeeks.com/>

Antonio E. GonzalezSep 19, 2007, 5:29 PM ET↩ Antonio E. Gonzalez

On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:41:31 -0700, Antonio E. Gonzalez wrote:

Oooh, time for the yearly "Starvin' for Ramadan" strips!:

<http://www.applegeeks.com/lite/index.php?aglitecomic=2007-09-14>

<http://www.applegeeks.com/lite/index.php?aglitecomic=2007-09-17>

<http://www.applegeeks.com/lite/index.php?aglitecomic=2007-09-19>

Tony LinguiniSep 20, 2007, 9:46 AM ET↩ Antonio E. Gonzalez

On 19-Sep-2007, Antonio E. Gonzalez wrote:

Aw, Starvin' Marvin's not in any of 'em! ;)

Antonio E. GonzalezSep 20, 2007, 11:53 PM ET↩ Tony Linguini

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:46:15 GMT, "Tony Linguini" wrote:

He's so dedicated, he starves year-round!

UbiquitousOct 14, 2007, 10:22 AM ET↩ Antonio E. Gonzalez

In article , [email] says...

On the positive side, Starvin' Marvin is too weak to kill infidels.

Antonio E. GonzalezOct 14, 2007, 6:01 PM ET↩ Ubiquitous

On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 10:22:21 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:

Like for most anybody, it's primarily about putting food on the table, not so much the "kill infidels" nonsense a few obsess about . . .

JeßusSep 12, 2007, 11:27 AM ET↩ Ubiquitous

Ubiquitous dribbled:

Fuck off turd.

UbiquitousSep 16, 2007, 11:12 AM ET↩ Jeßus

In article , [email] says...

You know I'm right.

Charles & Mambo DuckmanSep 17, 2007, 1:42 AM ET↩ Ubiquitous

Ubiquitous wrote:

And Christianity is a peaceful religion, just as long as the women are barefoot and pregnant, the boys buggered and the gullible flock stripped of their money.

Malachias InvictusSep 17, 2007, 8:44 AM ET↩ Ubiquitous

"Ubiquitous" wrote in message news:fcjh02$guj$[email]...

Replace "Islam" with "Christianity" and you are still right.

Buckaroo BanzaiSep 22, 2007, 2:14 AM ET↩ Jeßus

"Jeï¿½us" wrote in message news:fc8vq1$8ob$[email]...

Are you ACTUALLY defending Islam as it's practiced by too many muslims?

I mean, "Fuck off turd"... That's basically saying that you agree with women being beaten, boys being molested (a problem I don't ascribe with Islam) and non-believers should be killed? Who's the turd here?

Happy birthday, Butters!