ITS A CARTOON!

Come on. I just noticed that there are tons of threads about Cartman's Mom in Playboy. I got the picture off the binaries. Are we that desperate that we get off from cartoon tits? I dont get why everyone likes cartoon nudity. Its not real, just a drawing. I also don't get the new fascination with computer-animated video game girls like Lara Croft. Also just a cartoon.

Dude, it's not supposed to get you hot & bothered! It's supposed to make you laugh! I can't believe you even considered "getting off" on that picture of Cartman's mom! In case you took it out of context, the foldout in Playboy was not a feature of Playboy for its readers to jack off to; it was an ad for the new season of SP.

On Sun, 5 Nov 2000 18:17:23 -0600, "Bao H. Lammy" wrote:

Really? I remember reading somewhere it was the centerfold.

I am such a pessimist...

It's a foldout with "December" at the top, but it's not the official Playboy centerfold of the month. Just an ad.

There is *nothing* more pathetic than people getting their jollies off of nudie cartoon pics.

In article , [email] () wrote:

I suspect it's more a matter of, if you've got to draw them anyway, make'em look cool. Granted, that doesn't explain Cartman's "mom".

wrote

It was a joke, not something that was supposed to get you off! Christ!

In article ,

It's an animated show for adults, not a cartoon. There's a difference. And the reason there are tons of threads like that is because, as fans, we like talking about the show. That's why we're here, to talk about it.

The only difference is the use of cutouts instead of drawings.

In article ,

Cartoons are made for kids. South Park isn't made for kids, therefore it's not a cartoon. It's an animated show for adults. And they don't use cardboard cutouts to make the show anymore, and haven't for a really long time. They draw and animate everything with a computer now.

? Where did you find this definition of cartoon? As far as I can tell, "cartoon" and "animated show" are really the same thing. Is this a distinction made by people in the industry or something? Because it sure isn't an official definition.

I gotta agree with Bao, dude. You can go to the Internet Movie Database (www.imdb.com), do a keyword search on "cartoon", and find Scooby-Doo and the Simpsons listed alphabetically right before South Park.

Besides that, your original premise is flawed. It should read, "Many cartoons are made for kids."

-Jack [email]

In article ,

I can think of more attractive cartoon females than Mrs. Cartman (Leela and Amy from Futurama, for example), but I don't really see much difference between getting aroused by a fictional character and, say, a model in Maxim. They're both just pictures, and you have no chance of actually touching either one of them. When it comes to sexual fantasies, I say the weirder the better.

PS If anyone's into cartoon she-males, Doug Winger has some nice ones available...

http://velar.ctrl-c.liu.se/vcl/Artists/Doug-Winger/pandrool.gif http://velar.ctrl-c.liu.se/vcl/Artists/Doug-Winger/PandFeeling.jpg http://velar.ctrl-c.liu.se/vcl/Artists/Doug-Winger/BlatedValentine.jpg

Brian Griffin ([email])

wrote in message news:8u7gsn$7i2$[email]...

Dude, that's pretty fucked up right there.

In article , [email] (core_dump) writes:

Feeling a bit guillty there, core_dump?