Okay, I'm sick of seeing this "I'm so 1337" crap all over the web. Besides being yesteday's teen chat lingo, what does it mean? What is its origin? I think I remember something about "leet" -- whatever that means. But I can see how 1337 flipped upside down and backwards can look like "lEEt" if you write it a little differently from the way it appears typed. I think the origin has something to do w/ hacking. It's off-topic, but it seems that this group gets a nice mix of people of all ages and backgrounds....TIA
OT: 1337
no. 1=L 33=EE 7=T 1337='leet, which is short for "elite". as in an elite class of people. and by the way, mr. glass house:
is stupid 'net slang also.
-jake(ok)
"it's not the band i hate...it's their fans." -sloooooooan
Thanks for the help. TIA is "stupid"? How so? I don't consider it slang at all, but an abbreviation that saves time typing. I type TIA not to be "1337" -- but to save time. Same for BTW, AFAIK, FOAD, etc. Time-savers.
Now, "1337" seems to be particularly stupid because it only saves one keystroke vs. "elite," and none at all vs. "cool" -- or do you prefer kEwL?
"Bao H. Lammy" wrote in message news:[email]...
You know, most of my passwords look like l33t-speak.
"l33t" is short for "31337" which is hacker talk for "Elite" which in hacker language means "I'm so cool".
Thanks!
In article , core_dump writes:
You mean "1m s0 kewl". HTH!
"Bao H. Lammy" wrote in message news:[email]...
Your so 1337.
MC
(Trevor AND Simon) = FALSE wrote in message news:9hj3vu$eblo9$[email]...
lamer only
(Trevor AND Simon) = FALSE wrote in message news:9hj3vu$eblo9$[email]...
Eh eh eh lo lo lo ih ih ih to to to eh eh eh
YOU RETARDED CUNT
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 23:56:51 +0100, "doki" wrote:
ooh ooh, I don't understand it so it must be stupid!
"John "John Eddowes" Eddowes" wrote.
Actually, I was not far off with my vague memory of what it meant, and it's not stupid because I didn't fully understand it. It's stupid because it doesn't save any effort to type it vs. typing what it means. Just like kEwL is stupid, though that's even stupider.
"Bao H. Lammy" wrote in message news:[email]...
Stupidest of all is people who right 2001 as Y2K+1. ITS EVEN LONGER YOU COMPLETE ARSE-GITS.
Adrian
In article , Adrian Wood wrote:
Or people who write write as right.
The other way round it is, of course, perfectly justifiable.
i thought that '1337' was a year that got refererd to lots