How to Legally Approach the Detestful AOLer Everyone's Having Problems With

Dec 5, 199718 posts by 11 postersalt.tv.southpark
18 posts

To Whom it may concern:

Those of you who are fed up with the annoying, defamatory, detestful, and now anti-semetic marks of Dieyuppie can take affirmative steps to cancelling his ability to access the internet, legally, now that his pitiful attempt for attention has reached "hate speech". As an attorney for an Intellectual Property law firm (yes, lawyers can enjoy Southpark too), I specialize in disputes over the protection of Intellectual Property (trademarks, copyrights, patents, etc) over the internet, and am quite familiar with AOL's legal and moral obligations. I have already done my part in contacting AOL, and now the rest of you can do the same; the more people who do it, the faster the Problem person will loose his/her account. According to the recently decided (Nov. 12, 1997)Fourth Circuit case, "ZERAN v. AOL Inc." (for those who wish to look it up, it has not been federally reported, but is available on Lexis at 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3791), though the plaintiff in that case lost (partially because AOL claimed to have "lost" the applicable records) AOL would still, if it receives notice of unlawful, defamatory, hateful, or wrongful activity by one of its subscribers, terminate that account and provide the necessary information to the proper authorities. Well, AOL has been notified by myself, and certainly, I hope, by others on this newsgroup. Lets hope the rest of you who are personally offended and disgusted help out this cause and similarly complain. I will include a hyperlink below. Thank you, and please don't let one person ruin it for the rest.

When you get to the below page, simply choose the topic "Comment about an AOL member's use of the internet"

http://www.aol.com/info/feedback.html

IP Lawyer -- please e-mail me, your account bounces.

"IPlawyer" spouted:

!>To Whom it may concern: !> !>Those of you who are fed up with the annoying, defamatory, detestful, and !>now anti-semetic marks of Dieyuppie can take affirmative steps to cancelling !>his ability to access the internet, legally, now that his pitiful attempt !>for attention has reached "hate speech". As an attorney for an Intellectual !>Property law firm (yes, lawyers can enjoy Southpark too), I specialize in !>disputes over the protection of Intellectual Property (trademarks, !>copyrights, patents, etc) over the internet, and am quite familiar with !>AOL's legal and moral obligations. I have already done my part in !>contacting AOL, and now the rest of you can do the same; the more people who !>do it, the faster the Problem person will loose his/her account. According !>to the recently decided (Nov. 12, 1997)Fourth Circuit case, "ZERAN v. AOL !>Inc." (for those who wish to look it up, it has not been federally reported, !>but is available on Lexis at 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3791), though the !>plaintiff in that case lost (partially because AOL claimed to have "lost" !>the applicable records) AOL would still, if it receives notice of unlawful, !>defamatory, hateful, or wrongful activity by one of its subscribers, !>terminate that account and provide the necessary information to the proper !>authorities. Well, AOL has been notified by myself, and certainly, I hope, !>by others on this newsgroup. Lets hope the rest of you who are personally !>offended and disgusted help out this cause and similarly complain. I will !>include a hyperlink below. Thank you, and please don't let one person ruin !>it for the rest. !> !>When you get to the below page, simply choose the topic !>"Comment about an AOL member's use of the internet" !> !>http://www.aol.com/info/feedback.html !> !>

Jeff Novell [email] "You can't always get what you want, but if you try sometime, you just might find, you get what you need..." -Jagger/Richards

Well, I reported Dieyuppie. DIE, DIEYUPPIE!!!!!!!!!

IPlawyer wrote in message ...

cancelling

Intellectual

who

reported,

Dear America Online--

The excerpt below is one of many vulgar and offensive posts sent to the newsgroup by one of your subscribers. He has continued these postings despite repeated requests not to.

I was under the impression that your service had a policy of canceling the accounts of users who were deliberately disruptive.

--Elocutus (posted and e-mailed)

In article , [email] (Dieyuppie) posted to alt.tv.southpark:

-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====----------------------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet

dumbass wrote>I was under the impression that your service had a policy of canceling the

you were under the wrong fuckin impression you fagget SouthPark Rules Dementia Sucks Lets be friends to the end -Charles Ray

Dear America Online--

Here is another example of your customer, DieYuppie's, offensive, off-topic, and misspelled posts.

I will be happy to continue forwarding them to you until this matter is resolved.

--Elocutus

In article ,

-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====----------------------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet

Oh please...if you're going to throw around empty, shallow, and useless insults, at least learn how to spell, you underling.

Go away, little kid.

ChesireBat

x x VV

Necrophilia means never having to say...well...anything!

Dieyuppie, in another dazzling display of non-erudition, embarassed everyone in Carlsbad when he wrote:

Achtung! Chuckie, if you're going to waste our time with inane drivel, at least learn how to SPELL!

are you referring to my use of the word fagget becuase if you are you are fuckin wrong you queera faggot is a bundle of sticks a fagget is what all you jews are and besides didnt you know that i speak charles ray you stupid queers SouthPark Rules Dementia Sucks Lets be friends to the end -Charles Ray

Elocutus of Borg wrote:

Thank you, E of B. But to really show the camp counselors at AOL what he's capable of, you should've attached that picture he threw in of the labially pierced nude. . . .And don't forget the death threats!

On Tue, 09 Dec 1997 14:03:51 -0600, Elocutus of Borg offered this unto Shub-Internet:

<censored for everyone's protection>

Good, but you really should include complete headers with a complaint. It's a bit hard with DejaNews, but I'm sure you can manage it.

Ia Shub-Internet, Black Goat of a Thousand Servers! Ask not what Thee Shub can do for you, Ask what you can do for Thee Shub.

Ooooo! Now, that's a *tough* insult...musta taken a month for you to come up with that one. And really really smart, too. Boy, that would bring anyone to tears, I tellya what.

Go away, little boy.

Try alt.insults.petty.

ChesireBat

x x VV

Necrophilia means never having to say...well...anything!

kymbot wrote>

no kymbot i am a southpark fanatic but apparently these people are not i thought the whole spirit of show was to make fun of the jews and the stupid and that is what i tried to do here but you people are just too fuckin dumb SouthPark Rules Dementia Sucks Lets be friends to the end -Charles Ray

In article , [email] (KymBot) wrote:

I don't know if I'd go so far as to say "fanatic," but quite a few of us get involved in a good, SP-related thread once in a while.

At some point, the Signal:Noise ratio may improve again.

--Elocutus

-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====----------------------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet

Oh it exists all right. It's just about as evenly applied as a campaign finance law.

I got a TOS once for referring to something as "a bunch of modell" on the Baltimore R****s message board. Meanwhile there are posts on some of the music boards that say "Fuck You" (or more accurately "FUCK YOU") and that's it.

Also, I don't think they enforce TOS the same way on Usenet. They cancel the MMF chain letter posters but that's about it.

In any case AOL has SO many free discs out there it's very easy to get back on....I know of people who have up to five times.

<(       )(       )( (B)  -----<"Howdyyy Ho"

members.aol.com/mrhankkey/index.htm

hey this has been dead for some time

lets leave it that way

Mr Hankkey wrote in article ...

music

it.

cancel

back