Suffer the little children...

Child molester chef lure all four boys into his big stretch darkl bleu cadillacc and chaines them to the seate . He with his best friend, doghumper jesuss. Chef get butte on tops of cartsmand and force mouthes open. then hee takes crap doewn catrtasmans thraote. tjhen he say dammm, not enough crap left for other boys. but jessus pat him on shouilder and say it okay. be just liek with fishes and loaves. so child molester chef able to crap down all tjhroates of all the boys , the n chiold molester chef tak them hhoems with him because he says he wants to have little crackers in befd,. he and jessu chaine to bed and takes off all there clothes. can see both gettign hard. then cm chef take whip and beat on cartsman's badck til it reall blooody. he do screemsn, ohhhh ahhhh uhhhhh. doghumper Jesus and child molester chef drink malt bliquors and lasughs at him. Then jessu say I know something fun to do with thems. I remembers tjhis from Saturdays Night Lieve bakc in the 70[s. Have stanns and Kyille and keiine do impression of tomny orlando and Dawn if someone poked really long steel spikes through eyes. Chef say ,d amn that never funnie cause didn;t really put steel spikes in eyes. So Jesus get out real spikes and a hammer while boys screems out no no non non no no and cry then they poke sopikes though eyes, blood everywhere and loud screems of paine. then unchaine and boys writhe and roll over floor. Jesus say, yeah, I think it would go something liek that. He and chef both laught reallys hard . say you know never really found them boys that funnie before, but this a is real knees slaper. Jesus say suffer the little children who cum unto me anad luaghts. Then jesuse get it on with gay dog while chef do kennies. Then boths molest all little blind boys while cartsman watch and screems then say hey, have do something with little pig boy. So hanbg up outside and start skinning, cartsman yell loud, chef say shut up, and hits in mouth to brreake jawe. he cry while they poke one of his eyese out, say lets hear you do impression of of bar steisand. HEy his yelling sound liek her singin, say chef ha hahhahaha. after get off first layer of skins and stab in stomech cartmna unsconsiious stop yelling, both say, tired of this and take boys and dump in center of town, Mr, Gayrison see them and get turned on so thaty get raeped again., he ream them with puppet too. All boys blind now so other kids in school pick on them and maekt to walk down manholes and in front of traffic so Carsman crippled in wheelchaire too now. Chef haev fun by serving them his own crap fried and thay cant tell differecne.

judge listen to jEsus who tells him that the parents are too blaem for what happened adn giev custody to child molester chef and he gets too raep them every day now.

Doc, I'm pround to be an Asshole On Line

Jesus Christ, is this supposed to be funny, your own little fanfic? Why don't you stay in your child pornography newsgroup where you belong, you sick bastard. Cartoon children or not, this is sick and NOT funny at all. You need serious psychological help.

DocWonmug wrote:

I agree with you, man you are one sick Mother Fucker Ms. Toni Dimayuga wrote in message ...

don't you

bastard.

serious

doghumper

takes crap

other

fishes

all

reall

molester

from

do

spikes

steel

non non

loud

both

funnie

children

and

to

you do

say chef

unsconsiious

town,

ream

down

now.

differecne.

what

them

On 2 Aug 1998 06:05:52 GMT, [email] (DocWonmug) wrote:

<inane ramblings snipped>

So what's this guy's problem?

Anyone notify his ISP?

I hate to generalize, but you know those AOL retards...

----- Lone Wolf AKA Powerslave My Kung-Fu is the best.

"Into the flood again... same old trip it was back then... so I made a big mistake... try to see it once my way..." - Alice in Chains, "Would"

"I suddenly remembered my Charlemagne. Let my armies be the rocks and the trees and the birds in the sky." - Sean Connery, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade

In article , [email] (Lone Wolf (Chris Baile)) wrote:

He says he's 'mimicking South Park fans.' The best medicine is to ignore him. That's my policy now.

No, *my* Kung-Fu is the best. And don't pretend you don't know.

-----> the davester: nirvanasongs @ yahoo.com SPAM BAIT: [email] No, my Kung-Fu Kung-Blew.

Nirvana Song Encyclopedia: http://nirvanasongs.home.ml.org alt.tv.southpark.fanfic FAQ: http://www.geocities.com/~dgisoft/faq/

I agree with you. I think attention is exactly what this sicko wanted in the first place. Look how many of us made comments on what he/she wrote? Toni

[email] wrote:

As opposed to EROLS retards?

An object in possession seldom retains the same charm that it had in pursuit. -Gaius Plinius

On 2 Aug 1998 19:20:21 GMT, [email] (MOWBIE) wrote:

Lot more of them than there are of us.

And have I come across as being particularly retarded?

I thought not... I could be wrong.

----- Lone Wolf AKA Powerslave My Kung-Fu is the best.

"Into the flood again... same old trip it was back then... so I made a big mistake... try to see it once my way..." - Alice in Chains, "Would"

"I suddenly remembered my Charlemagne. Let my armies be the rocks and the trees and the birds in the sky." - Sean Connery, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade

Wel, yu now wat dey sed;

hukd on fonix werkd fr mi!

Xenu Self-declared Anti-Scientologist(Go ahead, try and sue me)

Oh, and make sure you go, "*PLONK*" whenever you use it so, so that EVERYONE knows you've killfiled someone! It'll make you feel oh, so special!

:P

--C. S.

Forgive my naivete in NG speak, but what's a killfile and plonk? Toni

Keith M. Kurzman wrote:

Ms. Toni Dimayuga wrote:

A killfile is a program that you can use to filter out someone's post. Sometimes someone will post *PLONK* meaning that they have killfiled someone.

On Tue, 4 Aug 1998, Mike Cohen wrote:

There is a a killfile for Netscape at www.desisoft.com called fixnews.

Free Agent, while a good news reader, does not have a killfile, but the registered version, Agent, does. I believe that Gravity also has a killfile, and has a better chance of being upgraded than Agent presently does.

Tracy

        "I have a prodigious quantity of mind;
                it takes me as much as a week sometimes to make it up."
                        -Mark Twain

Change the planet to its moon, europa, if you want to mail me

In article ,

	I cant believe so many people got spastic about that tedious little
sarcastic parody of what the whole south park esthetic seems to trade on.
ie. something that seems shockingly innapropriate (mainly the use of
semi explicit sexual content around the cartoon kids, and the fart/shit/piss
taboo flirtations)
	I love the way they are so quick to label the author as sick, and
assume that censorship is appropriate ( notify the ISP! ), when for a hell
of a lot of other people, the SouthPark show, and its fans probably deserve
the same.
	'But there are descriptions of rape and abuse of children, and that is
_eeeevilll_!' Of course raping children is horrible beyond description, but
writing a stupid parody about it isnt. Maybe it was just too crude and raw
for people to deal with, as it suggested a little too raggedly, that
SouthPark is mucking around in some of the taboos webbing children and
sex...maybe humor is the safe periphery between hell and boredom...
	But I guess folks are simple minded when it comes to their taboos, even
folks that probably think they are cool, modern, right thinking, on the
edge, God Damn It! SouthPark fans. I know someone wrote an editorial
once, recommending the slaughter, and sale of the meat of poor children;
Im sorry, I dont recall the author, or what plight he was satirizing, but
it is read in high school english classes, and understood to be sarcasm.
But then, maybe some of the readers of this newsgroup havent progressed that
far in the educational system yet...

Paul

I can't believe you're actually defending the author. How can you say that writing a parody about raping children isn't horrible? What about the guy who wrote a "story" about raping and tortuing one of his female classmates? Was that ok to do? Fine- in that case it dealt with a real person, whereas our resident pedopiliac author wrote about cartoon children. After all, this show itself seems pretty horrible-I mean, it's full of bad language, sexual innuendo, and a little boy horribly dies in almost every episode.

But there is a line between what is considered acceptable and what's not. This person crossed it with his/her story. You feel he/she has a right to write whatever he/she wants. That's well and good, but this person did not respect the rights of the other people in the newsgroup who didn't want to read such a God awful graphic account of pedophilia. You're right, some of us don't have the stomach for this sort of thing...I guess we're conservative in that way as we don't like to hear stories of children-cartoon or not-get horribly tortured and raped. What if someone in this newsgroup had this happen in their family? It's just plain insensitive.

Wait, there's more... Paul wrote:

Simple minded? Haven't progessed that far in the educational system yet? You have no right to insult the people in this newsgroup, even those with whom I get into arguments (hi Lone Wolf). In the end, and I've said this before-I think author X wanted to get our attention, and he/she did...but not as well as the "Bill Gates gets burned-literally" subject. Looks like this author will have to try harder next time. Toni

As long as he doesn't act, yes.

If you don't want to read it, don't read it. This is the _exact_ argument the christian nazis like to use to try to get SP off the air. "We can't possibly control our TV's, so let's get rid of the show." What he wrote is annoying and a waste of bandwidth, but I have a killfile.

What if someone had a kid killed by a train? Kenny dying would then be "insensitive". Who cares? If it didn't happen to you, don't worry about it.

art

art wrote:

So if someone writes a story describing that he wants to rape and torture your mother or sister (if you have one), that's ok, so long as he doesn't act on it? I'm sure it wasn't ok for the poor girl who was the subject of the story. It's stories like these that add fuel to sexual violence on women and children. I'm not saying that's the main cause, but for some people who are somewhat already mentally unstable, these kind of stories can be enough to push them over the edge and yes, act on their impulses.

Unfortunately, I don't think I have a killfile. Believe me, I didn't want to read this story, but I accidentally did because I had no idea from the title what it was about. I was just reading the post, like I do all other posts.

Toni

In article ,

Sigh, I must be stupid to be still in ass over breadbasket in this thread...

It is not stories like these that cause sexual, or other violence to occur, rather the actual occurance of sexual abuse and violence of children. What sort of insipid education leads you to believe that such tedious literature is so dangerous? Read your Vachss! (But ohmygod, they actually talk about the hideous things that happen to children, better shut their traps before cruising dimwits get some ideas, or anyone actually faces real problems and makes an attempt to sort it out..)

	You dont 'accidentallty' read anything. If you actually read it, you did
more than me; I just scanned its predictible course. You paint yourself as a
helpless omnivore: 'I was just reading the post, like I do all other posts.'
	If you actually read it, and 'all other posts', maybe you have a disorder
which may explain this censorship rash; people cant help reading things,
and these things can control their minds!!!! Either that, or some part of
you _enjoyed_ reading it. And that is not a facetious comment .

Paul

My hero!

Rabbit

Ms. Toni Dimayuga wrote:

Please ... I've been fighting with the "people against pornography" idiots around here for the last 10 years over this crap. There is absolutely NO accredited study that proves a causal link between stuff such as this and an increase in crime.

As for "sexual violence on women and children", please don't lump women in like that. I'm 39 years old. I don't need the same protection as a 7-year-old.

Now back to your regularly scheduled South Park stuff ...

Rabbit

I didn't say I was against pornography, just those that display gratutitous violence at women and children. You're right- average men who view/ read sexual violence will not necessarily commit a violent act on women and children any more than children who watch violence on cartoons will exhibit violent behavior. However, for those who already have that violent nature, like I said, this sort of thing just might push them over.

Rabbit wrote:

Sorry...it wasn't my intention to offend you, but we all watch the news. We know of the severe, sexually violent acts that have been committed on both women and children. That's just the point I was trying to make.

I agree-let's end this thread, shall we? Can't wait for the new season to start so that we can talk about something we all agree on :)

Ms. Toni Dimayuga wrote:

There is still not a single accredited study to prove that.

Rabbit

OIC, so porn that displays justifiable violence against women & children is OK?

An object in possession seldom retains the same charm that it had in pursuit. -Gaius Plinius

Oh brother...must every single word I write be scrutinized and nitpicked on by others? Like I said, I'm leaving this thread. Over and out. Toni

MOWBIE wrote:

Don't let the doorknob hit ya where the good lord split ya.

An object in possession seldom retains the same charm that it had in pursuit. -Gaius Plinius

A- HA HA HA HA!! I'm laughing so hard I fell off my chair like Cartman did at the begining of "Tom's Rhinoplasty". You witty, witty people :) Toni

MOWBIE wrote:

MOWBIE wrote:

Well, as long as it's sold from the top rack ...

Rabbit

Absolutely.

More of the same old arguments from the anti South Park censors. "If kids see it on TV, then they will do it." I'm not a fan of the original author, but there is a first amendment protecting him. I also really hate hypocrites, and you appear to be a prime example.

If you read much of the story at all, you did it on purpose. From all the misspellings and poor grammar, there is really no way anyone could see something offensive accidentally in that message.

art

Well this proves one thing. Trolls are almost invincible. They thrive on the heat of flames. We can only slay them by taking away all the flames ... ignored, the bastards freeze to death. I hereby swear never to flame another idiot troll* and help it grow strong on our angry fire.

Martin

"I do not vote for politicians. It only encourages them."

--Mark Twain

*Except for Roman

In article ,

	Writing about anything is acceptable, if one believes in 'free speech'.
In the United States of America, some of us think quite highly of the
concept.
	Are you truely a SouthPark fan? Didnt the aliens essentially kidnap
and rape Cartman? (anal probe, etc) Do you even watch the show, or
does your concious mind sort of glaze over, and occasionally get goosed
into bemusement when little drum riff punchlines kick in. 'Yeah I want
some Cheezy Poofs!' 'Swweeet' 'They killed Kenny...'

I doubt the author is a predator. However, if so, such actions would be horribly wrong, and punishable by whatever dire consequences society should bring to bear. However, I suspect that they just mixed their sarcastic medicine way too sloppily, bitter and spicy for simple folk like yourself.

You have the right not to be offended. I understand your perspective, I just think its far more horrible and sad than the thing that has gotten you so upset. I doubt you are 'conservative', I just suspect you dont 'have the stomache for' an appreciation for what freedom and liberty actually mean. People like you litter the US, living in a country which was founded on some of the most radical ideas of the reformation, and which has fought, through the efforts of some very brave and brilliant individuals to actually secure many of the rights that the constitution and bill of rights promised, so long ago... and so many common citizens havent even done the basic homework to understand what 200+ years of thought, debate, suffering, and hard won victories even means. Sad. 'Eternal vigilence' and all that.

I have every right to express my opinion. Obviously, you arent trying to express any concept of libel/slander, so I wont go into that. I believe you are a supercilious twit. And worse, that you are pretty close to Lone Wolf, in that you dont like people who think. Or at least, dont think in the narrow channel that guides your self satisfied little thoughts:)

Paul

ps. Your 'he/she' political correctness tick is not only annoying, but reeks of your supercilious nature. There is obviously something deep and profoundly interesting about SouthPark, in that it attracts many fans such as yourself, who blithly skate across the veneer of its grade school jokes, and denying where its true source of humor lies.

Paul wrote:

You didn't have to be so sarcastic. Free speech is of course, one of the foundations our country is built on...but there are certain forms of free speech that infringe on the rights of others. Case in point- those who throw racial slurs at others. They have every right to say those things, but it's at the expense of others. Yes, you're right- the author had every right to write this story, but the people in this newsgroup also have the right not to read this sort of thing. I sure didn't want to read it-as I'm sure many people here didn't- but I assumed it was just another regular post. The author could have gone to a more appropriate newsgroup where it could be properly appreciated.

"Cartman Gets an Anal Probe" pales severely in comparison to what this person wrote. There's a difference between funny and severely disturbing, and this little story was definitely the latter.

Of course I'm a SP fan-what else would I be doing in here in the first place? I've seen every episode, thank you.

Like I said, you didn't have to insult me like that. It seems to me that you're the one who seems to have taken this whole thing so seriously. Why do you consider yourself to be so intellectually superior and mature to those of us who showed our dislike for this story? I think it's rather commendable of you to stand up for other people's free speech but you needn't belittle those who disagree with you. Just like this person had every right to post this story, people had every right to criticize it.

I did this because I didn't want to offend anyone else. Someone might have bitten my head off because I assumed the author was one gender or another.

Toni

Yes, it is a parody, but it is not a well-done parody, and it makes you very unable to tell the difference between a parody and a sick bastard (most of the responses were from people who thought he was serious). This is nowhere near what South Park thrives on (*clever* parodies, ripping on celebs for a *reason*, and other assorted crap, and I mean crap in a *good* way). This is my opinion. Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one, and some really stink.

Marguerrite, Hunter of the Infamous Matt and Trey (they call me Kim, but I know better) Aka Crabtree-Norn "Sit down and shut up!" "&^*$ Censorship!"-originated on alt.tv.southpark

In article ,

[... my own, deleted, gone...]

	The objections were not one of style, or literary merit. They were protests
of its very existance, and attacks upon a letter, which if one supposes the
respondents had the power of law, would have censored and punished the
author. I dont think anyone here has said anything other than that it was
poorly done at best.
	I dont give a rats ass if some people are too dim to see that it is a parody,
or if it is a parody. People have the right to write things down. These are
what is called 'ideas'. In America, we have a concept called 'free speech'.
I wont go into it, 'cause promoting it is like selling assholes, and you
know what they say about them...

Paul

ps forgive the construction of that first sentence; it is obviously deformed, and polite individuals should ignore the withered limbs... :)

Jonathan Swift, I believe ...

Rabbit (Too lazy to walk across the room to check today ...)

Right you are; and I wandered over to my own library to confirm it:)

Jonathan Swift

'A Modest Proposal' for Preventing the Children of Poor People in Ireland from being a Burden to Their Parents or Country, and for Making Them Benificial to the Public

A work, which might just as easily apply to the homeless of todays large cites...

Paul

' I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled, and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricassee, or a ragout.'

In article , [email] wrote:

todays large

I've heard that we taste like pork. Can Swift confirm or deny this? :)

Martin

"I do not vote for politicians. It only encourages them."

--Mark Twain

Nonononono*no*, we taste like *chicken*! *Everything* tastes like chicken. It's like a rule or something.

Marguerrite, Hunter of the Infamous Matt and Trey (they call me Kim, but I know better) Aka Crabtree-Norn "Sit down and shut up!" "&^*$ Censorship!"-originated on alt.tv.southpark

[email] (GUMPELS) wrote:

Dogs and guinea pigs taste like chicken. I know about the dogs, because a friend of mine (unknowingly) at one on holiday in Greece. A newspaper report on Peruvian natives (who eat guinea pigs as a delicacy) says guinea pigs taste like chicken.

Haven't got a clue what humans taste like... (phew!)

[attributions messed up before I got to it]

In article , see-my- [email] says...

I have heard that the pork thing is true.. There is or was a cannibal tribe out there somewhere and 'human' in their language translates as 'long pig'.

[email] wrote:

The good folks in alt.tasteless should be able to give you an answer (and sources), but humans taste like pork, at least that's what Dahmer wrote.

We've warned you Doc, and now it's time to receive your punishment. Scroll down...

FUCK YOU
========================

LeEsPaM2  -- South Park Fan
------------------------------------------------
"Vas deferans?"
"Mmmph mmphp mmph mmp mm mmph."
"Oh."
------------------------------------------------
PERSONAL QUOTE:  "OH, nooooo!!!"

In article , [email] (DocWonmug) wrote:

<snip sickening pedophiliac ramblings>

YOU VAS DEFERENS!!

Martin

"I do not vote for politicians. It only encourages them."

--Mark Twain

Diids yooouuu nkoowww thaattsss yyyooouuuu shod rilly shudddd uuupppp. zzyyoouu aernt foony. yuo'er e tasbard.

nand goe beck two nidkernarden.

~Kieeellee Bossroloffski~

<snip out story> Hmm...I wonder what Doc "I'm proud to be an asshole online" Wonmug thinks of all the hub-bub he's caused with his story? I haven't seen any posts from him.

Toni

I forgot...Doc's been killfiled, so we won't be hearing more from him, right?

Toni

Ms. Toni Dimayuga wrote:

On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Ms. Toni Dimayuga wrote:

Not quite...the act of using a killfile is not global. So, if I killfile a troll, unless you do the same, you will most certainly still see his posts.

Tracy

        "I have a prodigious quantity of mind;
                it takes me as much as a week sometimes to make it up."
                        -Mark Twain

Ms. Toni Dimayuga wrote:

I think it takes him about three days to sound out each post and then try to make sense of it.

Rabbit

Rabbit said...

ROFLOL!!

I think that's the best post in this whole vloody thread... ::grin::

Tirya

Excuse me, but what's ROFLOL?

Toni (who is not has eloquent in ng lingo as she wishes)

[email] wrote:

On Fri, 07 Aug 1998 22:56:15 -0700, "Ms. Toni Dimayuga" wrote:

Rolling On the Floor Laughing Out Loud

Other notable "Netspeak" terns:

ROTFLMAO (Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Ass Off)

LOL (Laughing Out Loud)

IMO (In My Opinion)

IIRC (If I Recall Correctly)

:) smiley face

;) winking smiley face (often indicates someone is kidding around, if placed after a seemingly offensive sentence or at the end of a post)

;)_ smoking smiley face

(8^(|) Homer Simpson

----- Lone Wolf AKA Powerslave My Kung-Fu is the best.

"Into the flood again... same old trip it was back then... so I made a big mistake... try to see it once my way..." - Alice in Chains, "Would"

"I suddenly remembered my Charlemagne. Let my armies be the rocks and the trees and the birds in the sky." - Sean Connery, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade

I could have sworn someone told me b4 that LOL meant "Lots of luck". Guess they were wrong, or maybe I heard them wrong. But thanks for the mini tutorial. The Homer emoticon is pretty clever (as all of them are in their way). Wonder who came up with it? Toni

Lone Wolf (Chris Baile) wrote:

On Sat, 08 Aug 1998 11:51:19 -0700, "Ms. Toni Dimayuga" wrote:

Illiterate teenagers... too lazy and undereducated to type out complete words.

I weep for the future of this country.

----- Lone Wolf AKA Powerslave My Kung-Fu is the best.

"Into the flood again... same old trip it was back then... so I made a big mistake... try to see it once my way..." - Alice in Chains, "Would"

"I suddenly remembered my Charlemagne. Let my armies be the rocks and the trees and the birds in the sky." - Sean Connery, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade

I could have sworn someone told me before that LOL meant "Lots of luck". Guess they were wrong, or maybe I heard them wrong... Toni

Lone Wolf (Chris Baile) wrote:

Ms. Toni Dimayuga wrote:

When I was a cab driver many moons ago, it was slang for "Little Old Ladies". The dispatcher would say, "Go get the LOL at the bingo hall."

Rabbit

Has Internet access become so expensive that we can't even afford the bandwidth necessary to transfer text and are now reduced to using these god awfull acronyms?

Oh the humanity! Jon

Lone Wolf (Chris Baile) wrote:

On Sun, 09 Aug 1998 03:22:25 -0400, Jon wrote:

As I said... it was started by illiterate and ignorant teenagers, too lazy to type out complete words.

----- Lone Wolf AKA Powerslave My Kung-Fu is the best.

"Into the flood again... same old trip it was back then... so I made a big mistake... try to see it once my way..." - Alice in Chains, "Would"

"I suddenly remembered my Charlemagne. Let my armies be the rocks and the trees and the birds in the sky." - Sean Connery, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade

Lone Wolf (Chris Baile) wrote:

Well, actually that was a joke. But for god's sake lets not encourage these demonic little bastards. Type my friends, type like there's no tomorrow!

Jon

Lone Wolf (Chris Baile) a �crit dans le message ...

AKA??? you mean Also Knowed As right? :0-P just pointing out the irony.

Jon wrote:

Y

Rolling On the Floor Laughing Out Loud