This *PLONK*ing business

Sep 25, 199818 posts by 8 posters
18 posts
Tom Arthur

Does anyone ekse think this plonking is getting out of hand? One person tries to offer a different opinion/idea, and Ann (you're all guilty) etc. jumps down their throat and rips their insides out. Usenet is a medium for free speech, and I know we've had our share of trolls over the past few weeks, but come on, we all know that every time you reply with *PLONK* (unless it is to a true troll) you will still reply/retaliate to that person's right to free speech and free expression. Goddammit, most of you live in the US, "the land of the free" (or something like that) and you of all people should allow people to express themselves. This is not a commie newsgroup.

Apart from all of that, it sounds like a you're a bit fucking stupid when the essence of your reply contains *PLONK*

Regards

Tom Arthur "It only takes one tree to make a thousand matches, it only takes one match to burn a thousand trees." -Stereophonics, "A Thousand Trees"
AnnTom Arthur

Not going to plonk you. But yes, I'm the first to admit with my shiny new killfile I have been TOO plonk happy but lets see shall we, who's on my plonk list... [email] -"Aaa hahaha" [email] (DocWonmug) [email] -"Bozz" (this was for being an ass) -"roman" -PAUL RAM -Funkidelic [email] -Chakktor [email] (DINTY H) OK, I don't think that's too bad considering that's from other ng's too! I admit I did wrongly killfile someone but I appologized and quickly removed them. So, you may have seen many plonks but, some of them I was kidding (someone commented and I said plonk but didn't actually do it, was kidding) but mostly just plonking trolls and people with really annoying sig files. (no one needs a 100 line sig file!). So, I don't think your going to see THAT many more plonks from me. -me

Green MegamanAnn

Ann wrote:

Do you think killfiled people get some kind of automatic nasty message when you plonk them? They don't. There's no point in "apologizing" to someone who doesn't even know you've killfiled them or un-killfiled them....unless of course you thought that by screaming PLONK at them in a public thread you're inciting others to do the same......which, I must say, would be kind of conceited, the idea that your opinion of anyone's plonkability carries weight with others.

This is absolutely true!!!! THere've been more PLONK posts than trolls lately. Who gives a fuck whether you plonk someone? Just plonk them and move on. You dont have to announce everything you do.

G.M.
BiffGreen Megaman

Come on, give her a break, she probably thinks someone will actually add those names.

Opps I plonked myself, now I can't read my own messages. Can someone help me...... Skid :-)

Note: anyone that responds and tells me how to un-plonk myself will be showing their ignorance.

In article , Green Megaman wrote:

BiffAnn

Gees, Who cares who you plonk. Do you really think anyone needs to know who you plonk. I don't remember anyone posting a message saying. Duh I don't know what is right and wrong, can comeone help me form an opinion? Skid

In article , Ann wrote: >Not going to plonk you. But yes, I'm the first to admit with my shiny >new killfile I have been TOO plonk happy but lets see shall we, who's on >my plonk list...

In article , Tom Arthur wrote:

*PLONK!*

Just kidding.

Martin "All right! All right! I can't read... I'm illegitimate!" --South Park (Remove kill_all_the_spammers to reply)
Tracy DeuelTom Arthur

On Sat, 26 Sep 1998, Tom Arthur wrote:

Yes, but that's the business of the person who owns the killfile.

Don't quite see your logic on this one. Just because a person has the right to post what they want, doesn't mean that I have to read them. This has nothing to do with free speech, I am not oppressing anyone when I add them to my killfile, I am just choosing not to read them. I'm certainly not preventing anyone *else* from reading them, so there is no repression of free speech whatsoever.

Now, on the other hand, if you tell me that I am obligated to read something that I don't want to, isn't that an infringement on *my rights*?

No one is preventing anyone from expressing themselves. Hell, they can express themselves in any way they please...doesn't mean I have to read them.

And you are certainly entitled to that opinion.

Tracy

  Well, when a man and a woman love each other very much they go out
    to the garden and look under a cabbage leaf ....
      Then they shag like minks. -Kevin "Professor Bobo" Mowery

Change the planet to its moon, europa, if you want to mail me

BiffTom Arthur

[snip] If you are under the impression that when someone out there says person "a" should be *PLONK*ed that there is a bunch of sheep that automaticly killfile the person. Don't. It is just another form if crying as far as I am concerned. Right up there with "i'll complain to your ISP for speaking your mind". ( remember this is a public newsgroup, on a thing called User-Network)

In fact with myself, it usually does just the opposite. I frequently go back and reload old messages to see what the "plonker" is complaining about. You are right most of the time they just don't like someone's opinion.

Besides, if you killfile someone you will never know if they ever turned their actions around. It is just too easy to just not read the thread.

If I ever "plonk" someone, it should be a personal thing. And Personally,,,,, I don't allow anyone else the power to tell me what to do.

The plonkers usually use the same bad language, that they are complaining about. Many of them are so intelligent that they even thought [email] was the real ones. Like matt and trey would have to come here to get Ideas. Gees, I laughed at that one for weeks. Wish I had of thought of it.

Skid

AnnBiff

To your other reply, I posted it because I was singled out in particular, by the author, I wrote my list to show him that it was only b/c my killfile was new.

Ohh ok, so when someone says you a "dildo licking bitch" you should actually care about what they have to say? And you should take that abuse?

All the trolls are smiling now, because you actually thoughts of their posts as opinions, you took the bait. When trolls post saying that they don't like south park and it sucks or it's racist, most often they are just trying to stir up some responses, not get their opinions heard.

So, your saying, that we should all put up with verbal abuse because some troll may just come in here and appologize? Well I disagree, if a troll DOES come in here and appologize there will be many of responses and I can read it then.

A personal thing? Well I publicly plonk because it tells the troll (according to how many people do respond with plonk) we're not going to listen to your BS here. Take it elsewhere. Who said if one person says plonk everyone else has to follow the band wagon? There's NOT a gun to your head.

You mean we say fuck, shit, etc.? Well who doesn't? It's the way the troll uses it that's offensive. Given, occasionally anyone can get pissed and use the language but that's the trolls only vocabulary!

Many of them are so intelligent that they even thought

It was me who thought of that. And I got plenty of ppl telling me I was wrong. I was but, I thought, stiring up controversy...what else are Matt or Trey good at? But others noticed similarities in recent south park shows to their fanfics, they thought maybe they had somehow influenced Matt or Trey, and they weren't talking about anyone at webTV. -me

BiffAnn

Nobody cares.

Yes you should, or respond and ask for more.

You need an apoligy??? I apoligize that there are twerps in the world. Didn't you know that.

Uhh, Me ??? Check your thread, I am not the one you were plonking and complaining about. I just commented on your plonk list.

Now I am really lost, If you didn't put the plonk list up or tell us all, who you are plonking, and you don't expect anyone to follow it, then why do you do it.

Rise above it. Come on, you can do it.

If you did start that matt and trey thing, my compliments. If anyone saw similarities they wanted to. If anyone told you that you were wrong, it was because they felt stupid and thought you took advantage of them, but you don't need to rub their nose in it. Just sit back and smile.

Skid

AnnBiff

No I meant that when you plonk it tells the TROLL, to take it elsewhere! I did it because it tells the TROLL that the ppl that plonk aren't going to solicit your bs.

Rise above it? Everyone curses sometimes, it's a fact of life, get over it.-me

BiffAnn

In article , Ann wrote:

You are playing into their hands. Just ignore it.

Not directed at your language... A comment in general. About your "I must talk that way so they understand", and "should I let it go". I am going to now take my own advice. Bye. Skid

AnnBiff

To reply with just plonk bothers them because they know you won't be able to read it ne more. It's about equivilant to ignoring them. -me

Tom ArthurAnn

In article , Ann writes

What I was in part trying to get at in my original post was that you do not actually *PLONK* them when you say you do, because you do keep replying to their inflammatory/retaliatory messages. Plus the fact it makes you sound like a numbnut.

P.S. My newsreader (turnpike) makes no sound when I killfile, this bothers me. Regards

Tom Arthur

"I kicked him square in the nuts, and he cried like Nancy Cerrigan." - Cartman

AnnTom Arthur

Well I do plonk them, Look back, before when I was using my mailfilter, the plonks didn't work, but now with my new killfile, it actually works. The only way I can see their posts is if they change their name or if someone replies! -me

AnnRKist1Ann

I was wrongly *PLONK*ed (I'm not naming any names, because I'm not juvenile like that) by someone who obviously skimmed my post, labeled me a troll (wrongly and publicly), and added me to her killfile. I think to label the majority of this newsgroup "sheep" is inappropriate, because to my knowledge no-one else followed suit in my viscious evisceration. I do agree that to killfile someone who doesn't care to read certain posts is the right of the ng user; however, it is getting to the point that if someone doesn't agree with particular members or is not as evolved as some members are in their knowledge of what the words are to "Kyles Mom's a Bitch" they are *PLONK*ed for being a troll or a retard. Isn't this a little excessive?!?!? I thought this was a news group, not the preliminaries for MENSA {ok, I probably spelled it wrong, I am obviously not a member of that organization :0)}.

The point of my original post was not just to stop people voicing an opinion being wrongfully plonked, but also to make sure that lots of you didn't keep on making arses of yourselves by replying to messages and threads with the stupid eponymous fucking *PLONK* shite, come on people, rise above it and plonk quietly in the relative privacy of your own homes, I'm damn-near imploring you!!!! It makes for un-needed replies and takes up valuable threads. Regards

Tom Arthur

"I kicked him square in the nuts, and he cried like Nancy Kerrigan." - Cartman

BozzBiff

Oh my god, someone with an intelligent and realistic view. Good one.

Skid wrote in message ...

wrote:

killfile

your

User-Network)

back

You

their

Personally,,,,,