Well, it was "Fajitas night" last night...
BRAAAP PROOT FLOOT TOOT!!
(Note that "FLOOT" may have something to do with classical music.)
Well, it was "Fajitas night" last night...
BRAAAP PROOT FLOOT TOOT!!
(Note that "FLOOT" may have something to do with classical music.)
D.G. Porter write:
488> Everything.
489> Well, it was "Fajitas night" last night...
489> BRAAAP PROOT FLOOT TOOT!!
489> (Note that "FLOOT" may have something to do with classical music.)
490> Hey Tholodork, that might have been a compliment!
491> Laughing my ASS OFF!!!!!!!!
What does any of that have to do with South Park, Porter?
On or about Tue, 08 Apr 2003 18:36:43 GMT, [email] made the sensational claim that:
Does fajitas night mean nothing to you?
Obviously it doesn't mean anything to Tholen. Maybe the intergalactic transmitter up his butt stopped working too. Better call the Joosians!
D.G. Porter write:
492> Obviously it doesn't mean anything to Tholen. Maybe the intergalactic 492> transmitter up his butt stopped working too. Better call the Joosians!
What does any of that have to do with South Park, Porter?
[email] wrote:
[Tholen dishonestly snipped the references to "Fajitas Night" (1) here.]
Three things (incl. the one you dishonestly cut out). Still having South Park comprehension problems? OK, I'll make it easier. I'll number them above.
[email] wrote:
[Tholen snipped all references here to "Fajitas Night." He asked what that had to do with South Park.]
Nothing, it's all South Park (and you did pose the question what the reference to "Fajitas Night" had to do with South Park), but you were not standing up to the antagonism in the South Park newsgroup, so I had to cross-post it back here to alert you to "Loosechanj's" antagonism toward you there. Wouldn't want "Loosechanj" to get away with antagonising you as he did!
Now, you dishonest dweeb, I noticed that you took a post entirely concerned with South Park and removed the cross-post to that group. I fixed that though. Now, you will respond to this post through that group or not at all.
D.G. Porter write:
493> [Tholen snipped all references here to "Fajitas Night." He asked what 493> that had to do with South Park.]
493> Nothing, it's all South Park (and you did pose the question what the 493> reference to "Fajitas Night" had to do with South Park),
You just contradicted yourself, Porter. How can I allegedly pose a question about something that had been snipped?
493> but you were 493> not standing up to the antagonism in the South Park newsgroup, so I had 493> to cross-post it back here to alert you to "Loosechanj's" antagonism 493> toward you there. Wouldn't want "Loosechanj" to get away with 493> antagonising you as he did!
493> Now, you dishonest dweeb, I noticed that you took a post entirely 493> concerned with South Park and removed the cross-post to that group. I 493> fixed that though. Now, you will respond to this post through that 493> group or not at all.
What does any of that have to do with South Park, Porter?
[email] wrote:
I first posted, regarding you having a WMD in your butt: "Well, it was "Fajitas night" last night..." This is an overt reference to the first new episode of the season. Cartman refers to "Fajitas Night" in the season's first episode and implies that the event caused him severe flatulence.
On or about Tue, 08 Apr 2003 18:36:43 GMT, [email] made the sensational claim in message ID no. in response to my above post that:
And Loosechanj asked you in message ID no. : Does fajitas night mean nothing to you?
So you have shown your ignorance of SP to the degree that you cannot recognize overt SP references.
God, what an ignorant fuck you are. Your knowledge of SP is up there with your fluency in Finnish. Are you for real? Only a total moron would deny that the above has nothing to do with SP. Or do I have to explain it to you like I would to a four-year old?
On Tue, 08 Apr 2003 13:46:58 GMT, "D.G. Porter" wrote:
Tholen is a kook.
dizzy writes:
168> Liar.
168> Liar.
168> Liar.
169> What does the fact that you're the most dishonest person I've ever 169> encountered on USENET got to do with astronomy, tholen?
170> Kook.
171> It's not any editor's fault,, as you know tholen. It's simply your 171> dishonesty.
172> Tholen is a kook.
What do any of your unsubstantiated and erroneous claims have to do with South Park, dizzy?
[email] wrote:
Your stubbornness is very reminiscent of Cartman's refusal to study.