Death wrote...
There was no justifiable reason for a person of any profession to be carrying a flashlight as he walks to work at night. But this doesn't seem right for a country with ubiquitous video surveillance to go around broacasting images of minor criminal offenses all over teevee and the internet, then prosecute someone for illuminating a crime scene with a flashlight. The local police probably have already planted hidden cameras in the bushes and wank it to the dogging action.
"dank" wrote in message
carrying
Have to watch those damn flashlights. I hope they weren't loaded with Energizer batteries. Those faggots would keep on going and going ...
I wonder if American flashlights have that same effect on faggots.
The new CDC slogan can be: Shine the light on AIDS Prevent AIDS- outlaw flashlights
I wonder if the cops will start tazing people who carry flashlights.
Oh well, just rambling........
" Death" wrote in message news:omwNi.288$[email]...
Rambling, perhaps, but the coppers in Britain don't carry side arms. If this stupid PC attitude continues, the PC's in Britain will be not only unarmed but blind as well.
The firey's sprung some poofters having a good time in the bushes and then moved along. They were open minded enough to leave them to it, so why couldn't the dung punchers be courteous enough to say "fair enough"? It's a two way street, even though I personally consider the avenue that they were travelling is a one way street in the opposite direction. That's their call though, and I won't judge them on it. The fact that the good selfless people at the Avon Fire & Rescue are being judged for simply finding a few people enjoying themselves in strange ways is simply ludicrous. What is the world coming to?
"dank" wrote in message news:bEuNi.57817$[email]...
What an absolute crock of shit. How on Earth could the Avon Fire & Rescue chaps ascertain that there was no danger to anyone without first inspecting what was going on?
Thanks for posting this. It's too ridiculous for words!
"Wog George" wrote in message
Rescue
inspecting
Now, that was my first response (to myself) when I read the article. Had someone been in the bushes and in danger of ( anything you list) and the firemen had walked by without even a glance- the shit would have hit the fan. CNN, the comunist news network would have played that up for days. This politically correct crap is really getting out of hand.
" Death" wrote in message news:gCCNi.5820$[email]...
"Ron Bartle" wrote in message
about
Perhaps that was the case but what happened to the 4 MSMs who were having sex in the bushes?
Well it seems they walked away laughing.
You really believe there was not a political agenda lurking in there somewhere?
Suppose the firemen had happened upon a man raping a child in the bushes and rescued the child from the attack, would the firemen have received a fine and suspicion?
Wog George wrote...
Wouldn't a typical fire department include routine patrols to look for signs of fire? Forest rangers search for smoke from peaks and towers, and I suppose in a country with lots of centuries-old wood houses you would have patrols look for signs of fire in neighborhoods. Not just fire, but any hazardous situation - the sounds they heard could have been someone trying to illegally dump industrial waste, something that would require the services of the fire department's hazmat team.
I cross-posted this to the South Park group because it resembles the "Death Camp of Tolerance" episode. In that episode, Mr. Garrison tries to get fired for being gay so he can sue for $25 million, so he hires a flaming leather homo named Mr. Slave as his teacher's ass-istant, then proceeds to stick a gerbil up his ass in front of the class. When the kids complain to the principal, they are chastised for their intolerance and required to attend a Nazi-like Tolerance Camp, while the parents apologize and hold an awards ceremony to honor Mr. Garrison as courageous teacher of the year.
Are you seriously suggesting that there are modern-day European Fire Services who have the human and fiscal resources to provide foot patrols looking for fires and other hazards?
I hope somebody knowing the details of this case shows up - It would appear far more likely from the quoted Fire Chief that these guys were just someplace -other than- where they were supposed to be.
End of story.
(Wether what they saw was discovered copulating in the bushes were the ubiquitous small quadrapeds or -in this constellation- the somewhat less common bipeds is of little consequence I would feel. On the other hand if somebody has got a *thing* about PC being out of control - which it might well be - then I suppose this story could be bent over, or twisted around to serve that need like many others.)
rb
"dank" wrote in message news:tvNNi.6850$[email]...
/ -- /
"dank" wrote in message news:bEuNi.57817$[email]...
There is some info missing. For example, why did the firemen shine their flashlights on the fornicators? How long did they continue to shine their lights after they determined exactly what was going on? Was anything said to or by the firemen?
Now, assuming the firemen knew exactly what was going on and shone their lights on the men to embarrass them or shame them, I would say that the guys having sex in public were more in the wrong, because it's illegal to have sex in a park. Furthermore, if that was all the firemen did (and they didn't bother calling the police) then the parkfuckers should thank them. Don't illegally fuck in the park and then get twisted over someone annoying you for it.
I believe that laws against having sex in public are moronic and are symptomatic of a sick society which believes certain natural body functions are somehow evil. However, many other people feel differently and would be greatly offended and upset if they saw people having sex in public. The firemen might have been inconsiderate toward the people having sex, but the people having sex were being inconsiderate toward anyone who might have seen them.