Um, I read that Tray Stome and Mike Parker, creators of the South Park, died yesterday, April first. It was in, um, the newspaper. You can llook it up yuorself.
- Alley Assasin
Um, I read that Tray Stome and Mike Parker, creators of the South Park, died yesterday, April first. It was in, um, the newspaper. You can llook it up yuorself.
You are so lame it makes me cringe.
In article , Bao H. Lammy wrote:
Then I have succeeded in my crusade...
...to be lame.
In article , Bao H. Lammy wrote:
We prefer the term "specially abled"...
"ali assa seen"
I can see now that your inability to defend yourself even quarter-adequately must be due to being "specially abled." I retract my previous harsh words as I find it neither fun nor sporting to make fun of complete and utter retards.
"ali assa seen" wrote in message news:030420011409065072%[email]...
|
I prefer the term Troll. But hey, FOAD anyway.
In article , LooseChanj wrote:
Jeezis! Are you people really that pathetic and beyond help? There was all this talk before April 1 about how enery year someone pulls the old "death" gag every year, and then no one did it so I purposely typed on in with the names wrong, no attribution, etc, as an obvious gag. But a couple of you smaller, shorter and snipped-at-the-brain-stem types have been raising a fuss ever since as though you're defending the place against some evil troll here to treacherously spread intentional misinformation. Get thee to a clue, and eat a *bowl* of FOAD, fellas.
Nope. Never thought you were attempting to "treacherously spread intentional misinformation," nor was I trying to defend "the place." And yes, I knew what you were doing w/ your "gag." Just thought it was excruciatingly lame regardless. Still do.
In article , Bao H. Lammy wrote:
Fine. So how is that "trolling"? Or are you simply alluding to my having a gnarled hump and living under a bridge?
I never said you were "trolling" or called you a "troll." You must have me mistaken w/ someone else.
In article , Bao H. Lammy wrote:
Well, all right then. You're cool. But someone needs to bring back that buttinski LooseChanj so I can kick his ass.
Or, you could just drop it and hope everyone eventually forgets your involvement in this whole silly thing. later!
In article , Bao H. Lammy wrote:
You mean you think somebody beside you is still reading this thread?
No, that's not what I meant. I meant that you started this whole thing and no one thought it was clever or funny. In fact, the response was rather negative, and I thought it in *your* best interest to "drop this" instead of saying things like: "But someone needs to bring back that buttinski LooseChanj so I can kick his ass."
As for who is reading this thread -- apparently you are.
In article , Bao H. Lammy wrote:
Yeah, but I started it *and* I'm the only person who thought it was funny or clever. I don't get what your excuse is.
Boredom. Personal amusement. Ability to read extremely quickly. Assure myself that I am not slandered. Take your pick.
In article , Bao H. Lammy wrote:
I'll go with "Obsessive inability to allow someone else to have the last word". Care to prove me wrong?
Sure. You're wrong. btw, you'd have better success w/ having the last word in this thread if that sort of thing matters to you -- as I said, it does not to me -- if you didn't keep asking me questions. (Or implying them, as in "I don't get what your excuse is.")
Zzzzzzz... carry on... zzzzzzzzzz
On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 15:16:30 -0500, ali assa seen wrote:
The implication that they're not dead is cruel.