Ahem...

Dec 12, 199911 posts by 5 postersalt.tv.southpark
11 posts
ageorge3alt.tv.southpark

As a longtime member of the Los Angeles Film Critics Association, I am proud to be the first one here to post that we have voted to give the award for best score of the year to Trey and Marc Shaiman for SP:BLU.

With any luck, I'll be the one presenting the award. (I presented Matt and Trey with our animation award two years ago for Spirit of Xmas.)

Andy Klein

Nah. Of course it's not real. You think Academy members actually sit around, going on newsgroups and posting?

-Toni

Chelle wrote:

Well, no, I admit I am very gullible, but I guess I'm just hoping against all hope that Marc and Trey get the recognition they deserve :)

ageorge3Chellealt.tv.southpark

Who said anything about the Academy? I'm not an Academy member. I'm a member of the Los Angeles Film Critics Association, and after a long dull voting meeting, I indeed have no better way to unwind than sitting around posting on newsgroups.

Try this url: http://www.latimes.com/news/metro/19991212/t000113290.html

Nonetheless, I applaud the skeptical attitude. Too much bullshit gets turn into fact by gullible people online.

I'm sorry about confusing you for an Academy Member, although I still would have doubted you at any rate at the beginning, being that you're indeed correct in that too many gullible people spread the dumbest shit possible online.

-Toni

ageorge3 wrote:

You're right, I apologize for being cynical, I just wanted to make sure we weren't being duped. WTG Marc and Trey!!!!!

"ageorge3" wrote in message news:[email]...

Yeah really. Not like you claimed to be Matt or Trey. Or both.

Daveageorge3alt.tv.southpark

Sweeet. It ain't exactly an Oscar, but it's something.

Hey Andy? Just wondering. Any idea what the correlation between LAFCA and other major movie awards might be? That is to say, does winning this award in any way indicate a potential better showing at the Oscars?

Is it more like the new Hampshire Primaries, or more like Punxatawny Phil?

Good luck. Hey, keep a napkin in your pocket. If you get to shake Parker's and Stone's hands, immediately wipe the palm sweat off on the napkin and put it in a plastic baggie. You can get about $40 for it on EBAY. :)

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                        [email]
          (Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE*  I am not responsible for equipment damage due to reeeealy
dumb children with no parental supervision, and access to a hammer.
ageorge3Davealt.tv.southpark

Well, a number of us *look* like Punxatawny Phil.

I'd say we have next to zero value as a predictor, since our choices *tend* to be more "daring" than the Academy's -- as would the choices of just about anyone. (But we're still proud of it.)

Our only power vis a vis the Academy is to put a bug in their minds about something to consider and perhaps to validate the legitimacy of some vaguely offbeat choice. I have no doubt that the decision, for instance, of the National Society of Film Critics a few years ago to give Best Picture to Babe made it easier for the Academy to nominate the movie.

In this case, I'm not sure we'll have effect. But of course it was worth doing anyway.

Jeez, if that's how much sweat can draw at auction, maybe I should go for the big score and try to shake something lower.

Andy