Northern Kentucky

Jul 12, 2005, 11:01 PM ET29 posts by 13 postersalt.tv.simpsons
29 posts
Channel 6 Newsalt.tv.simpsons

I just saw the "Behind the Laughter" episode, and they clearly say that The Simpsons are a northern kentucky family. Also, isn't there a Shelbyville in Kentucky too?

Wait 'til you see the version where they changed "Kentucky" to "Missouri". Kentucky, a state founded by circus freaks. Which town in Kentucky was founded by people who wanted to have sex with their cousins? With the ocean nearby. The old squid processing district. With its allied tradespeople. The nuculur (sic) power plant. The elementary school that was moved there from Missouri. Capitol City. Yeah, Kentucky. The swordfish museum. And so on, ...

Aaron Space Museum

wrote in message news:[email]...

Actually, "The Simpsons" is shot on location in Springfield, North Tacoma (http://www.faqs.org/faqs/tv/simpsons/mini-faq/), where the family currently resides. (see map: http://www.inbowlinggreen.com/images/simpsons-usa.gif).

My question is, is Smithers gay? How about Lenny & Carl?

-R Flowers

R FlowersR Flowersalt.tv.simpsons

Now this is just weird - "Simpsons Reef", and it's just about where North Tacoma is!

http://www.surf-forecast.com/breaks/SimpsonsReef.shtml

I think I'm onto something here...

-R Flowers

1. One time, Smithers was black! 2. Lenny -> white, Carl -> black! 3. I think Shelbyville and Springfield are closer together. That map is not to scale. 4. You can get there pretty easily from Bakersfield! 5. Finally, a link I can follow at work without running the risk of being fired. 6. The ocean is nearby, the squid gutting district, etc.

Aaron Space Museum

If you had paid very close attention to that scene, you would have heard that it was NOT clearly said that they are a Northern Kentucky family. Rather it was stated such that they were *described* as a Northern Kentucky family.

XINO

Matt GarveyXino Kineralt.tv.simpsons

Xino Kiner wrote:

Here's the actual quote: "The Simpsons' bitter past was forgotten, and now the future looks brighter than ever for this northern Kentucky family." (Replace with "southern Missouri" as necessary.)

I'm not sure what your distinction is, but to me it sounds like it's both... am I missing something?

It means that they are from Northern Kentucky, but that the show takes place somewhere else. And it is worded that way so that we will continue to argue about it.

Xino has a habit of driving WIDE LOAD trucks through subtle distinctions, and then not understanding obvious references to recent popular culture or history.

Aaron Space Museum

problem

Dear Mr. Garvey,

Seems that you have got some problems with the concept of addressing people. Because I replied to YOUR message and not to Mr. Hirshberg's it can be determined that I was addressing YOU.

Let me know if that doesn't help.

From,

XINO

Xino Kiner wrote:

It's quite possible for someone to hit "reply" to the wrong message without thinking, you know; given that, your feud with Aaron, and the fact that I didn't understand what your problem with my response was, can you see why I'd ask?

OK, now that we've got that settled, may I continue to pull teeth? I still don't know what the matter is with what I said, since I don't see how being *called* a N.K. family and being *described as* one differs. At least, I don't see the distinction in the context of this particular line, since it's not like the line was "...for this family that's like people from North Kentucky." I also don't see this taking the shape of the "The family is actually from KY but the characters are from Anystate" explanation. So, Xino babe, can you tell us what the distinction is, to clarify your argument?

without

didn't

ask?

No.

And as I already have said, your opinion doesn't actually matter in this discussion.

XINO

Matt GarveyXino Kineralt.tv.simpsons

Xino Kiner wrote:

Hmm, well, until now, I didn't think you and I really had any beef (aside from some bad vibes I started to gather from what I thought was a friendly "Where's Xino?" thread); it seemed logical and prudent to seek out other explanations first, but please note that I left the current state as an option.

Well, your very premise is faulty... Until I get a better idea of what you actually meant, I can't really state my opinion. Oh, I said that it sounded like both things were equal in this case (and both true), but that was a setup to my clarifying question and not my final opinion. You still haven't explained what you mean, apparently preferring to make elusive and insulting replies instead.

If, however, the opinion of which you speak is not something I've already said but that which you anticipate, and you merely wish to exclude me from the 100th rehash of this pertinent debate, then I think I have some other opinions you also won't want to hear. (Plus, I've got this casino to build on the moon...)

R FlowersFunkyalt.tv.simpsons

"Funky" wrote in message news:eFgDe.1811$[email]...

Not a hovercar... a HOVER BIKE!

....bzzzzzZZZZzzzzZZZ....

-R Flowers

R FlowersMatt Garveyalt.tv.simpsons

"Matt Garvey" wrote in message news:[email]...

Sad. It wasn't always this way: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.tv.simpsons/msg/069f945cf2c7a074?hl=en&

R Flowers (remove the 'T' if you want to talk to me)
Matt GarveyR Flowersalt.tv.simpsons

R Flowers wrote:

Wow! This is like a look at some sort of kindergarten videotape... except that I didn't know Xino was ever my classmate! (Xino, did you disappear after 3 posts until about a year ago?) I also must look in bemusement at my own reply, as clearly I did not come close to grasping the "wizard" joke. Ah, the wisdom that comes with age...

Thanks for the sidebar, R... what made you look for that?

R FlowersMatt Garveyalt.tv.simpsons

"Matt Garvey" wrote in message news:[email]...

Well...

The other day I was looking at some of the OOLLLLD posts from the early Usenet which Google will show you - some going back to the 80's. Anyway, as I saw the thread devolve, I got to wondering how far back Xino's posts went. The example I posted was one of the earliest I found, and I thought it funny that you would be a part of that thread.

On a slightly less "topical" note - (have you noticed that *nothing* on alt.tv.simpsons is really *off topic*?) - I've always loved the tenor of this NG. I love the way that people actually engage and make fun of spam, rather than vainly protesting it. (And I know it's not really possible, but doesn't it seem like there's *less spam* for it?) I even like the "DENTAL PLAN" ~ "LISA NEEDS BRACES" perpetual post machines (well, up toa a point).

-R Flowers

that I

Yeah, and I think some people here still are in kindergarten.

Honestly I don't recall making that post, but I didn't use the Internet much at that time, I didn't have much access to it. Still cool to see that we conversed way back then.

XINO

from

"Where's

explanations

Well I don't have any beef you, just don't pick on me everytime I try to be myself and talk about The Simpsons here. Judging from the private email I've received there are plenty of lurkers who are interested in the details and over-analyzing. NO need to give me a hard time for discussing The Simpsons on a group named "alt.tv.simpsons".

Xino Kiner wrote:

Sorry if you got that impression - maybe I worded it oddly before, but I certainly have no problem with interesting details and analysis. However, it is natural in this group to expect a little derision (from others, maybe from me) in response. Eh.

Also, I know you didn't bring it up this time, but bear in mind that "hey I just saw this episode and it says they're from Kentucky and I like cheese" is one of those topics that's been done virtually to death, so little is going to be a newsflash (even with the understanding that it's just a joke)... I thought I saw where your comment was leading (actors vs. characters), but I don't think that's the case; wondering if it might be a fruitful avenue of debate, and also wondering how the two things were even different, I replied. I'm still wondering, but whatever is acceptable at this point.