This episode was rather funny. the writing was a little lapse, but the satire (the ride of failed dreams, etc) made up for it...
Springfield elementary should have got the "rampy" for when Fat Tony made SES "accessable"
This episode was rather funny. the writing was a little lapse, but the satire (the ride of failed dreams, etc) made up for it...
Springfield elementary should have got the "rampy" for when Fat Tony made SES "accessable"
"Mike McInnis" wrote in message news:Bj5S9.2429$[email]...
I thought it was a great episode and the writing was very sharp, except for maybe the final act. It's amazing that show in it's 14th season can still come up with episodes like this.
["Uniblab"; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 02:00:43 GMT]
I agree that this episode was very funny. It was a solid three, maybe three and a quarter, stars out of four -- certainly quite good and enjoyable (yet admittedly not an all-time classic). This is in no way meant to put down the episode; it was fun. I'll continue to watch "The Simpsons" if they can do THIS kind of stuff each week. Good work, everybody -- really.
Two minor things I noticed: (1) Was the animation or the coloring a bit shabby-looking in places? There were a few times that I noticed the "animation border" around Bart's mouth. And has anyone noticed that characters seem a bit too separated from the background? (2) I thought a bit of the satire, as is the writers' wont these days, was too in-your-face and blatantly obvious. Then to add fuel to the fire: "Mmmm, that's gooood satire!" That part was lame, honestly. (I LOVED the gas-corporation- sponsored electric car.)
In alt.tv.simpsons, on the "Janurary 5th episode" thread, Mike McInnis wrote:
SES was only accessable for thirty seconds before the ramps crumbled. The Rampy Awards committee demands more staying power than that.