Hmmm, this is kinda intreasting

Thanks for pointing that out.

Anybody who e-mails the abuse report to Rutgers, AOL, and Google concerning this person should strongly consider including that post as additional proof that he's intentionally violating their acceptable use policies and abusing their services. (I've pasted a copy below, with only the necessary headers.) Simply edit the report's introduction by including it as another >quoted post, if you so choose.

This also seems to solve the mysterious surge in Simpsons porno requests. Wouldn't it be so interesting, when Rutgers' network administrators call on this person to explain his intentional harassment and abuse of usenet netizens using university property, if they also raised the subject of his spearheading a tidal wave of psychotic posts drooling over a little eight-year-old cartoon girl's twat? Maybe they'll just decide he isn't Rutgers material.

"We Eat Seafood For Dinner" wrote in message news:[email]...

-------- I have sent both messages to the three e-mail address. I look forward to what Rutgers, AOL, and Google will carry out.

Spell "interesting" right, you stupid motherfucker.

[email] (We Eat Seafood For Dinner SUCKS COCK!) wrote in message news:...

Just because I fucked up on the spelling doesn't excuse you're camp's opprobrious plot.

[email] (Jsonitsac) wrote in news:[email]:

No one is anonymous on the internet.