I keep seeing this stuff about the first three years being the best of the Simpsons years. What's going on with that? Yes, it's true, the show was more in a sitcom family frame of mind, and most of what happened could be transferred to a real-life show. But that's not necessarily what makes the Simpsons great. Someone posted that "Maggie Makes Three" showed some "cartoonish" elements: Homer in the Die Hard fantasy, Bart's narration of Homer's head blowing up, Homer using Burns's head as a bongo... these were certainly a little cartoony. But they were freakin' hilarious. And they were set up believeably. They, with the exception of the Burns segment, were fantasy. It's nothing compared to today's quagmire of Homer's head getting trapped in a drawbridge, or Godzilla grabbing their plane out of midair.
But I digress. My main point of all this was that I think the middle years, 4, 5, and 6 were the best. There was true feeling, such as "A Streetcar Named Marge" in season 4 and "Grampa Vs. Sexual Inadequacy" in season 6, to satisfy all of you "reality-character-development-at-all-costs" folks, and enough political humor (Sideshow Bob Roberts), media parodies (Lady Bouvier's Lover), and all-round assy humor (Marge Vs. the Monorail) for people like myself. I think it has to do with the Conan O'Brien factor. Just a thought, respond if you will.
-Joe