Fraudcast Episode sucked

May 26, 2004, 12:19 AM ET22 posts by 18 postersalt.tv.simpsons
22 posts
fizeldobalt.tv.simpsons

That episode about Mr. Burns owning the press was the worst one yet. Ever since Lisa went from a niavee liberal child to a righteous do-gooder who's never wrong, the show seemed to be on a downward spiral. Was there anything funny about Lisa in that episode? Anything at all? Who is writing these episodes now, Ted Rall? Maybe they'll make fun of Tillman's death next. Bring back Conan! I remember the episode a while back where Lisa took the wrong bus and was lost, then she looks up at a flock of birds and determines which way is north from this, only to see another flock flying in opposite directing and start fighting,lol. They need to kill off Lisa like Flander's wife and the show would be better. I could care less what kind of political viewpoint they want me to learn, I'd rather see a comedy. All In the Family worked because they made fun of both sides (Meathead and Archie).

Matthewfizeldobalt.tv.simpsons

They DO make fun of both sides. Maybe they make fun of conservatives more. But they do make fun of liberals too. Like Mayor Quimby. Actually the Simpsons is still pretty traditionalist Christian. How many other shows show townspeople and family going to church on Sunday? Not many. Lisa has been an activist for YEARS and YEARS. The Simpsons has had a liberal bias for YEARS and YEARS too. This is nothing new.

Hey, I'm just glad to see conservatives are watching the Simpsons. My theory is that most conservatives started out watching the Simpsons when they were younger and unaware of their convervo tendencies. As they get intouch with their conservative side (onset of old age), they start to learn that most of the jokes are on them. Surprisingly, the Simpsons aren't funny anymore. Out of habit or some other form of pavlovian response, they still tune in to the shows; but, in order purge themselves they go out to newsgroups and talk about how unfunny the shows continue to get.

fizeldobMisterXalt.tv.simpsons

You are probably right to some extent, but then again I see old episodes that I think are pretty funny that I see today on sindication. The Family Guy takes themselves less serious than the current episodes of the Simpsons do, fortunatley they are bringing the Family Guy back. That Stewie cracks me up. MisterX wrote in message ...

VoVatfizeldobalt.tv.simpsons

"fizeldob" wrote in message news:aVUsc.69138$[email]...

You DO realize that episode came out about five years after Conan had left the show, right?

Brick is red, and Hitler's dead, Nathan [email] http://vovat.blogspot.com/
David Sibleyfizeldobalt.tv.simpsons

"fizeldob" wrote in message news:...

Do you realize that singularly Conan O'Brien only wrote three episodes over 10 years ago? Three episodes isn't even 1% of the show's run. I like everything he wrote, but Homer Goes to College was not well received by many fans at the time. If you're going to ask for an old writer (or writers) to return, ask or someone a bit more prolific.

The Simpsons has been offering politcal views since it's inception. Look back at the early seasons. You'll see plenty of political issues being discussed and lampooned. If you don't want politics in The Simpsons, you don't want The Simpsons.

The Simpsons commonly takes on both sides. While they clearly were poking fun at the Republicans with the "Vote Republican" line, they were clearly poking fun at Democrats as well. Did you see that the non-Republican was an overly liberal hippie? You could even argue that Burns disliking the media's portrayal of him is a jab at the so-called liberal media. We've known that Burns was a Republican for years. I don't see anything anti-Republican with having a Republican saying, "Vote Republican."

I will concede that The Simpsons is more liberal than conservative, but each side gets jokes at their expense.

David Sibley wrote:

No, but having Republicans meet in Dracula's castle and playing the "Darth Vader" theme from Star Wars in the background seems a teensy-weensy over the top. Teensy.

Ted S.Jack Schittalt.tv.simpsons

Somebody claiming to be Jack Schitt wrote in news:[email]:

Well, that's what a parody is supposed to do.

Look at the parody of Bill Clinton in "Homer to the Max".

Ted <fedya at bestweb dot net> The way I see it, you raised three children who could knock out and hog- tie a perfect stranger, you must be doing *something* right. Marge Simpson, <http://www.snpp.com/episodes/7G01.html>
kid moeTed S.alt.tv.simpsons

"Ted S." wrote in message news:[email] .de...

wrote in

playing the

a

Um, I don't think that was a parody Clinton. It was more of a depiction.

ESHAASTed S.alt.tv.simpsons

I've always seen that gag as a spoof on the "Republicans are evil" concept. It was an example of liberals with a sense of humor seeing the ridiculous in the shrill attitudes of liberals who lack a sense of humor. It didn't really parody anything about Republicans themselves; or about conservative ideas.

RockboyStoneco864alt.tv.simpsons

With Jamie from RWSD wrote:

His wrong what?

Rockboy One day you'll wake up and they'll be Advertising on police cars

"fizeldob" wrote in message news:...

Yeah, those fancy pants "book reading liberals" sure are annoying. Maybe you should just stfu and not watch the simpsons since they've been fairly left leaning for years.

Lisa: Grampa, didn't you wonder why you were getting paid for doing nothing? Grandpa: I figured it was because the democrats were back in power.

JQM

[email] (Metlhd3138) wrote in message news:...

Well i wasn't implying that they don't make fun of the left, but they sure do tear conservatives apart :)

My view is that they show democrats as being corrupt (i.e. quimby) and republicans as evil incarnate (burns, dracula, frankenstein, the league of evil, etc.) :)

fizeldob wrote:

LOL! This is so great on so many levels, a front runner for post of the month (and here it is only the 3rd).