Channel 4 Wins Rights for The Simpsons

Feb 20, 2002, 4:14 PM ET11 posts by 8 posters
11 posts
pete

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/entertainment/tv_and_radio/newsid_1832000/1832715.stm

Glad it wasn't won by Channel 5 and hopefully 4 will give better scheduling than the BBC. Only downer is having to put up with adverts halfway through :(

David Bruntpete

Ian wrote in message

/1832715.stm

I wonder if Channel 4 realise how dreadful the Season 12 and 13 episodes have been. Maybe they'll ask for their money back.

David

Scott VivianDavid Brunt

i wouldn't say dreadful... most of them were pretty good in the end (yuo have to watch them a few times)

CindyLoverScott Vivian

"Scott Vivian" wrote in message news:...

That tends to be the way with them, I find (they often improve on a second viewing).

CL

iainpete

"Ian" wrote in message news:[email]:

Let's hope they don't cut it to shreds like they did with Futurama . . .

iain [email] http://www.zootle.net/afda/ "how can you say that iain is a furyy fpevcg?!" - kristen
Matt Forbespete

"Ian" wrote in message news:[email]...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/entertainment/tv_and_radio/newsid_1832000/1 832715.stm

scheduling than the BBC. Only

And, no doubt, having them 'remove' bits, as they have done with Futurama.

M

AcK!pete

On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 22:14:59 -0500, Stan wrote:

No, channel 17! ;)

Damn, one thing I can't believe about Europe is how few channels you can pull in with an antenna... how many is there in the UK, anyways?

TTYL

... It's a little-known fact that the Y1K problem caused the Dark Ages. [email] remove "spa" to email
JeffersAcK!

On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 03:27:38 GMT, [email] (AcK!) wrote:

4 or 5, depending on where you live (theres a good few areas where its impossible to recieve Channel 5 unless you get it via satellite.)

Then of course there's digital terrestrial television where by with the addition of a set top box you can, in a lot of areas, recieve around 30-40 channels, a mixture of free and pay TV services.

AcK!Jeffers

On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:15:35 +0000 (UTC), [email] (Jeffers) wrote:

Damn, we have to liberate you guys from this cruel situation, and then enslave you with upwards of 70 channels... :)

TTYL

... Do artificial plants need artificial water? [email] remove "spa" to email
JeffersAcK!

On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 19:53:49 GMT, [email] (AcK!) wrote:

Oh we've already got that! With analogue satellite (now discontinued) you could get around 30 channels. Similar with analogue cable (maybe 40 or so- still going.) With Digital Satellite TV in the UK you can get at least 100. (And thats what I have) Of which I would say around 5-10 have programmes I want to see. (Not counting the existing terrestrial channels that are broadcast via satellite, sport, movies and music channels.)

AcK!Jeffers

On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 03:02:43 +0000 (UTC), [email] (Jeffers) wrote:

And there's the key difference: the basic cable package that most Canadians have gives them the 30 odd channels... paying a few bucks more yields the 70. If you get satelite, then you're talking hundreds...

The nice advantage of living in most populated parts of Canada is that we're close to the US border, so we get both Canadian and American channels (which increases the number of broadcasts of the Simpsons that we get every night).

TTYL

... Experience is what you get after you need it. [email] remove "spa" to email