"The Simpsons" - new title sequence
Feb 13, 2009, 10:17 PM ET31 posts by 21 posters
31 posts
Once Upon A Time, David wrote:
Whose grave is it on which Ralphie is playing sandbox?
** Captain Infinity
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 at 03:58:06, Captain Infinity wrote in alt.tv.simpsons :
I tried it, but got no sound or picture, even though it appeared to load.
"Paul Hyett" wrote in message news:[email]...
Works fine with Firefox.
Arnold Kim
Same here.
Armillaria caligata
After failing on YouTube and Smotri, I tried DailyMotion and I think I found success. Try this link:
Nevermind. They play hardball when it comes to copyright. I can't seem to upload it _anywhere_. Paul, maybe you could try another browser like EI or Firefox or Chrome or Safari and click on David's link again (TVWeek).
Matt Groening sux!
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 at 03:15:42, Taylor wrote in alt.tv.simpsons :
I only have IE7.
I suggest you download Firefox 3. It's better and FREE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZGz1Ajg7QU
This seems to be an official FOX channel so it should stay up.
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 at 10:05:02, David wrote in alt.tv.simpsons :
Thanks - that worked.
BTW, is the new title sequence a once-off or a permanent change?
Watch next week and find out .... doh!
HD is worth every cent. Not
I don't they would take all that time to make a new fancy HD intro to just not use it again. I just think it was a little long... the couch gag is to blame of course... and I noticed the goof with the head on the statue. That was a bit annoying, it was so obvious!
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 at 18:57:47, [email] wrote in alt.tv.simpsons :
Well, that live action intro was a once-off...
They did use it as the intro to an episode, at least on the US broadcast.
But you've indirectly answered the question...it was made as a promo, not to be used on the show, so they didn't really "go to the trouble" like they did here.
Nice titles, but it still won't stop the scripts from being terrible as they have been ever since season 11 (and a lot of season 10)
On Feb 15, 6:09 pm, Mike Henry wrote:
Is this series on Sky? There are so many episodes on i've never any idea when to tune in for a new one
On 2/14/2009 11:59 PM PT, Paul Hyett typed:
I read it was permanent and same with HD for future episodes.
Why would you want to watch The Simpsons in HD anyway? One of the few things it still has going for it is its old-school, low-tech ambience.
On Feb 17, 3:17 pm, Calum wrote:
The show was loaded with lots of details. I'm sure there's other folks who tried to decipher the entire Wall of Fame. And the thinner outlines on the characters were definitely appreciated.
I liked hearing the descriptive video service describe the couch chase.
"Calum" wrote in message news:gnf619$tck$[email]...
because it looks a lot better? - and it did.
Was it any funnier? If not, waste of everybody's time and money.
Once Upon A Time, Calum wrote:
Plus, you would think that if the Koreans could draw it in that kind of detail, they would have been doing so for the past 20 years. What a bunch of lazy bums! Just what are we paying them for? Anyway?
** Captain Infinity
On Feb 17, 8:51 pm, Captain Infinity wrote:
That's unfair. It's one guy in a sweatshop doing all that work. He wanted to retire in 1997 but Rupert Murdoch wouldn't let him.
wanted to retire in 1997 but Rupert Murdoch wouldn't let him.
Now it has gone over to digital animation, they can do it live - although that would be a terrific strain on the computers...
Paul
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:17:28 -0500, David wrote:
Heh. Maggie's price changed to $486.52. Deflation?
"David" wrote in message news:[email]...
Now you can more clearly see "NRA4EVER" on the cash register.
-- R Flowers
Yes, indeed: "HDTV is worth every cent."
Dan Dassow
David wrote in news:[email]:
The Simpsons? Is that thing still around?
"William Baldwin" wrote in message news:gnd9ug$mqd$[email]...
They've got it on computers now. (Well, Hulu anyway).
-- R Flowers