Bart on Focusin (sp?) or Homer without the crayon? Homer with the crayon or Ralph? Lisa or Martin Prince?
Just curious, DSX
Bart on Focusin (sp?) or Homer without the crayon? Homer with the crayon or Ralph? Lisa or Martin Prince?
Just curious, DSX
The first one is tough, but I'd have to say Homer w/o the crayon.
The second one is clear--Homer with the crayon. He at least doesn't start fires or wet the bed, and he did managed to invent the automatic hammer.
The third, I'd have to go with Lisa, although that may just be bcs. we rarely see Martin compared to Lisa.
Brian
DSX wrote:
Some more--crossing shows:
Who's smarter between:
Homer and Peter Griffin?
Bart and Fry?
Maggie and Stewie?
Brian
Brian Beck wrote:
Brian Beck
Homer - he may have some crazy plans, but most of them don't compare to what Peter comes up with.
Fry - Only because he's older.
Stewie, though it would make for an interesting episode to see Maggie try to take over the world.
Well... Scooby Doo can doo doo, but Jimmy Carter is smarter...
I gotta go Homer over Peter, though recently Peter's been funnier. Dunno what goes on in Maggie's brain but she could be really smart. Regardless, I take Stewie over Maggie, and for that matter, Stewie over Lisa, Stewie over Martin, Stewie over Homer without the crayon, Bart on Focusin over Homer without the crayon, however Stewie over Bart on Focusin. Stewie's just a smart dude.
-HM
"Brian Beck" wrote in message news:[email]...
homer... he diesnt piss off his family EVERY episode
start
bad
Ahh this argument is irrelevant. Frink is the smartest of them all. His IQ is 199 for crying out flaven!!
"DSX" < wrote in message
I forgot that one--Frink vs. the Professor from Futurama!
Frink's built matter transporters, but the Professor built a dark matter engine...
Brian
jesse donnellon wrote:
Professor Farnsworth is a mad scientist, and has 1000 years more of technology to draw on.
I'd say robots, a matter transporter, a flying motorcycle, a death ray (prototype) and hamburger earmuffs (with pickle matrix) are pretty damn good for the 20th century.
But even all that technology wasn't enough to break laws of physics--Farnsworth's Dark matter engine actually managed to break relativity--when has Frink shown anywhere near that brilliance?
Brian
Gene Poole wrote:
cmon, man...cut him some slack. they don't even have a third dimension in that world. and only 3 fingers.
physics--Farnsworth's
shown
I think we all remember a little something called HAMBURGER EARMUFFS!!!! Like to see the prof. top that one.
it would never happen. Those babies would be on the market while Farnsworth was still fiddling with the pickle matrix.
Somebody claiming to be Gene Poole wrote in news:[email]:
You forgot the sarcasm detector.
OTOH, Frink was dumb enough to fall for the Movementarian cult.
scientist, and has 1000 years more of
Now that's a real useful invention!
Somebody claiming to be "jesse donnellon" wrote in news:xNEN7.202774$[email]:
198... 197...
Actually, isn't Martin Prince's IQ 216?
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:46:47 -0500, DSX wrote:
I prefer him with the crayon myself:
'Extended warranty? how can I lose!'