Here�s another re-post. I�m still too lazy to write new review stuff. Tell me if the re-posts are annoying.
My 7G12 episode interpretation is one of my longest reviews yet (well, most of my recent reviews were pretty long). Get a load of this, one-line "Worst Episode Ever" poster ;-). It�s also a good example for interpretation and for the open concept of classic OFF.
--------------------------
Here comes a new and very very long review by me (very long indeed). I know that the second half of my season 4 short reviews is still missing, but for today I liked to translate my new German review, which I consider as pretty good but also pretty complicated. I�m not good in translation work and the lines were often difficult, so the English is maybe again rather bad. Feel free to tell me if there are weird mistakes or lines that make no sense (in a grammatical way ;-)).
Let�s have a look at a Season 1 masterpiece, 7G12 "Krusty Gets Busted".
There are many references in the episode, like the one about the Black Sox scandal ("Say it ain�t so, Krusty") or the one about "The Prisoner" and a whole lot more, but in this review I don�t want to talk about such obvious story elements and well-done humor (which is quite useful to make the episode interesting for younger viewers as well) but about the various deeper satirical and criticial concepts and the hidden complexity behind the "surface story" (7G12 is very complex, especially for S1 relations.)
The episode contains Lisa�s famous line "If cartoons were meant for adults, they'd put them on in prime time" so let�s have a closer look to determine whether the episode and its deeper content was meant for adults or not.
[Warning - almost 2 1/2 pages of rather complicated stuff]
The episode has IMO two deeper concepts behind its story:
- the social commentary (mob mentality, wrong behaviour of the media)
- the mediacritical commentary (quality of program, viewers behaviour)
the latter being the more complex (but also more hidden) content of the episode.
I. The social commentary
The social commentary refers to the topics of mob mentality and wrong behaviour of the media. The entire town is immediately (media-controlled) against Krusty, the reverend - symbolical for church as institution - even demands a "public burning" of toys on the stake (all the children�s toys burn quickly and produce toxic fumes <= satire within satire.)
It�s a portrayal of the townspeople as faceless and conformized mob (the line is important, we should remember it, I�ll come back to it later) where opinion is controlled by media or church and where the individual being is too lazy to have an own opinion, but just follows the flow. We can clearly see the concept in Homer�s line when Bart begs him not to join the mob and Homer innocently replies "No I'm not, I'm hopping on the bandwagon! Now come on, son, get with the winning team!". Homer is following the group, but he�s unable to notice it. That�s great satire, especially because 7G12 doesn�t only show the behaviour but also the roots of such behaviour (more about that later.)
In addition, the concept of social commentary also refers to the wrong behaviour of the media (but the borders to concept II are somewhat unclear here) which didn�t only condemn Krusty as guilty from the very beginning on, but also use the "tragedy" as a hook for (self-)advertising, for example Scott Christian bad-mouthing Krusty�s TV station or the gun ad "357 Magnum: The Clown Stopper".
Krusty�s illiteracy is a last comment about people on the borders of society and about a big problem which society often tries to ignore (there are a lot illiterate people in industrial nations) but it�s also an important aspect of concept II to which I�ll come very detailled now.
II. The mediacritical commentary
Different to the social commentary, I consider concept II as a concept about issues like TV quality and grade of intelligence on TV programs (for kids) and viewer behaviour, especially of a young audience, the latter leading us to a well-done and thought-provoking explanation for the reasons of adult mob-mentality in concept I. Both concepts, both satires of the episode, float easily together if we see the episode as one message. That�s classic writers work, that�s what OFF used to be.
The important question (and something many people don�t realize) is: "Was Sideshow Bob bad for the audience of Krusty�s show or was Sideshow Bob good for the audience of Krustys show?" Did Bob - the classic bad guy - ruin the show, disappoint all the viewers, and destroy Krusty�s idea of good entertainment (aka education) for kids? Did he?
Let�s have a look at the beginning of the episode, when Krusty appears on the TV screen and leads his famous dialogue with the (synchronized responding) mass of kids. The dialogue ends with Krusty asking "What would you do if I went off the air?" und the mass replies "We'd kill ourselves." Then the young audience (again synchronized) demands "the cannon, the cannon" (aka senseless violence against Bob) as one group. In a rather mean flashback to Krusty�s heart attack - Kent calls it one of television�s best-loved bloopers and is amused - Krusty�s "I�m dying" is answered with loud laughter by the mass and with no other reaction.
There is a very important and symbolical scene when Kent says that Krusty had become a changed clown after his heart attack: "this `new' Krusty devoted a small portion of every show to stamping out illiteracy in today's anything-for-a-thrill youth.'' We see Sideshow Bob who holds a bucket full of books in the background and Krusty who holds "Catcher in the Rye" upside-down in the foreground. Nothing had changed in the show, the "small portion" was meaningless, as Krusty didn�t know what to do with books (he�s illiterate and holds the book upside-down) and the true intellect (Bob) was still in the background, forced to remain in the background.
When Bob takes over the show, a lot of changing takes place - Bob starts to read from classic novels and sings songs from Cole Porter (once called "the man who kept civilized entertainment alive"), he talks about stoicism and philosophy, we hear music by Mozart as new title theme ("Eine Kleine Nachtmusik"). Finally, there�s intellect and culture in the show, even more individualism. The idea that the young viewers of a former clown show would accept such a radical change of style is certainly surreal and an element of exaggerated reality, but it�s IMO important for the episode.
To Krusty, his audience was a faceless, conform mass of kids (<= here we have the line again) that reacted to his lines and actions always in the same way, that even cheered and laughed when Krusty almost died on stage. Even after Bob�s takeover, that "sync behaviour" is still active and the kids react to Bob�s lines the same way they reacted to Krusty�s lines (though Bob corrects Krusty�s wrong grammar) and even Lisa asks Bart a little out-of-character "Come on, Bart, go with the flow" and thus joins the mass. The "flow" in Krusty�s/Bob�s audience of kids is the same "flow" that made all the adults burn toys on the stake. And exactly here with this kids, the episode shows us the roots of conformity and mob mentality, which we had seen in the first half of the story (<= brilliant.)
The episode has now a very important scene: Bob notices Bart in the crowd of kids and says that he sees a sad child and he comes to Bart, he talks to the individual in the mass (he�ll regret that ;-)). It�s not clear whether Bob comes to Bart because Bart doesn�t fit into the conformistic "cheering crowd" or whether Bob has other reasons, his line "I�m reaching out to you" seems to indicate that he takes individualism much more serious than Krusty did. The notorius bad guy of the show does something very positive (what a twist, excellent work of the writers.)
To come to an end: the episode is very unclear about the question of who�s the culprit and who�s the victim and it�s far away from a simple good/bad message. Bob primarily had good intentions, but his criminal ways were wrong. Krusty finally won, but won his audience? I think Krusty as well as Bob were both victims and culprits and the episode tries to show that. Bob says an important line at the end to sum up his basically good intentions that went totally wrong.
"Treat kids like equals! They're people too! They're smarter than you think!" <= plea for knowledge and individualism
There are some 49 seconds cut in syndication, including an I&S episode and Lisa�s great line about "cartoons being meant for adults". Well, I guess every fan of season 1 has the DVD.
I�d say 7G12 is a brilliant episode and very complex satire, excellent work of the writers with a lot of hidden references and concepts. Kids watch the episode because of good fun, adults tend to watch it for its social commentary. Those were the days before the show became flat and empty. We have a thought-provoking uncertainty whether Bob taking over the show was good or bad and we have the commentary to mob mentality, mass conformity, and its roots. In a season like S1 (which was often a little too much in-your-face) an outstanding masterpiece. Grade A+.
Comments are welcome.
Chris, who congratulates everyone who was brave enough to read all that stuff ;-)
P.S. Final criticism: how could Bob disguise himself as Krusty? It�s impossible. Where was his hair? How can he speak with Krusty�s voice? Wizard did it. The rest is good enough to ignore that.
P.P.S. Who expects something like that for the upcoming EABF Bob episode? ;-)