Holy mediocrity Batman, is that the best they can come up with? Please tell me the movie will be good and not just Homer doing stupid shit.
That Simpsons movie trailer
[email] wrote:
Mottola hates it? Sweet, it's going to be awesome.
wrote in message news:[email]...
Why stop now? They've been using Homer that way for 12 years.
[email] wrote:
Remember episode 9F19? Itchy & Scratchy left the Krusty the Clown show.
Remember the episode of "Worker and Parasite" that aired during that episode in replacement of Itchy & Scratchy?
Remember Krusty's reaction after seeing it?
That was similar to my reaction after seeing that trailer for next summer's "The Simpsons" movie.
"Robert Langlois" wrote in message news:[email]...
GABBO! GABBO! GABBO!
"What the hell was that?!"
Mr. Museum
[email] wrote:
It would have been okay as a trailer in a movie theater, but I expected more after all the hype. And it defeated the purpose of opening the trailer with the misdirection of the cute bunny and all, when they've been telling us all week that it's going to be The Simpsons Movie trailer.
It seems nobody else came to the same conclusion I did about this trailer.
It is a smart-ass, "jokes on you" type of humor: it's a WIDESCREEN GAG. That's it, pure and simple.
Get it?
- ben
wrote in message news:[email]...
I don't get it. How is it a widescreen gag?
-- R Flowers
Look at the clip again, the part where he is getting bashed back and forth by the wrecking ball. The rock and hard place are way on either end of the letterboxed frame. The (intentionally) lame rock and hard place gag goes on for that extra amount of time, sort of asking "hey, what's the joke here?"
The joke is "same old Simpsons humor, made marginally better by it being on a big, wide screen. Poking fun at themselves and the movie has kind of been the theme of the promotions all along.
you can see it again here: http://www.apple.com/trailers/fox/thesimpsonsmovie/trailer/
-ben
wrote in message news:[email]...
The 3-D animation leading into the promo is just that. But otherwise, I just don't think they're that clever. The various clips posted around the Internet show the full letterbox (at least the ones I've seen), but I can't remember anything seeming out of place last on my pitiful 4:3 TV. I could still see a rock, and the 'Hard Place' building.
But now I get what you're saying, and I don't want to belabor the point.
-- R Flowers
well, that's because it was shown in letterbox on the 4:3 broadcast.
Heaven forbid a point be belabored on a usenet discussion...
Once Upon A Time [email] wrote:
Wow, that sucks even worse the second time than it did the first.
** Captain Infinity
I did find the trailer pretty underwhelming. The bit with the rabbit at the beginning wasn't necessary, or very original, either. Some of the actual animation with Homer did look cool and unique, but the whole gag with the wrecking ball was stupid. Hope this isn't what the whole movie ends up being like.
Yeah, pretty stupid gag. Did you read my theory? Just wondering what anybody else thought about that idea.
Just what the hell was the last thing that The Simpsons did of which you have actually approved?
I'm sick of your and everyone else's negative comments.
XINO
BTW that is a serious and honest question that I expect you to thoughtfully answer.
Once Upon A Time Xino Kiner wrote:
I enjoy the Simpsons and watch it whenever I can. More often than not I get some laughs. Not as much as from Family Guy or South Park (or even Spongebob Squarepants) but it still beats just about anything else playing on TV at the same half-hour. But the trailer was crap, just not funny at all, and hardly incentive to go see the movie. I chalk it up to still being early in the production process. They may not have much they can publicize yet. Plus, I'm sure they want to keep as much under wraps as they can. I predict that future trailers will be better, funnier. This one feel very far short.
Thanks for asking. Now go lie down; you're so red you look like you're about to pop.
** Captain Infinity
"Captain Infinity"
I
even
not
much
under
you're
Heheheh alrighty then, thanks man. But you still haven't answered my question.
Xino
What's more he hasn't answered mine (i.e. read my original post and appraised my "theory of possible humor").
I'm not too offended, though, clearly he's not a "Simpsons fan" (hey that's OK! I mean it would suck to have to go that whole half hour with no tv!).
"If you have to explain it, it's not good, Chief"
Good catch.
XINO
[email] says...
This movie is ten years (at least!) too late.
Ubiquitous wrote:
I can almost see what alt.tv.simpsons would have looked like in 1996:
"Not only is the movie a sign that the show is starting a downward slide, but the fact that they had to start the current season in January just to have the manpower to make it makes things worse."
(And before anybody says, "They managed to make the movie in 2006 without cutting back on any seasons," the ability to do the coloring and film processing directly on a computer helps significantly; back in the days of hand-painted cel animation, there's no way they could have done this. And before somebody else says, "The X-Files Movie was made years ago without cutting into that series," there's a significant difference between live action production and animation production.)
-- Don
The X-Files movie was also a bridge between seasons as well.