JULIA LOUIS-DRYFUSS, STOP ENDORSING CRUELTY

Mar 17, 199714 posts by 13 postersalt.tv.seinfeld
🌀 Off topic🔥 Controversial

Thread urges Julia Louis-Dreyfus to stop endorsing Clairol due to animal testing practices, with mixed responses about her awareness and influence.

14 posts

DEAR ELAINE FANS, POST HERE IF YOU WANT JULIA LOUIS-DRYFUSS TO STOP ENDORSING CLAIROL PRODUCTS BECAUSE THEY DO UNNECESSARY ANIMAL TESTS. JULIA WILL GET YOUR MESSAGE IF YOU CARE ABOUT ANIMALS.

"'Older, wiser' never applies to me." - Morrissey "If you hurt me I'll be angry and I'll grow up way too fast." - small factory

Hi Julia,

Clairol is a company that does cruel, hideous, unecessary tests on animals. Examples of these worthless tests are the eye irritancy tests (dropping toxic chemicals into the eyes of albino rabbits) and the acute toxicity tests (aka leathal dose and poisoning tests.)

Julia, ask Clairol to put a permanent ban on animal testing. You've got the power and the influence. If they don't respond, please call for a Clairol boycott until they do. You could even donate some of your 7 figure salary from Clairol to the PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS to help make amends.

Yours for a kinder, gentler society,

Mike B)

http://www.iww.org/

Raise your hand if you think that JLD actually reads through this newsgroup...

...that's what I thought.

C'mon people don't you think your efforts (and your cause) would be better served if you wrote letters to NBC or to Julia's agent or to Clairol???? Let's not clog this newsgroup with someone's political campaign (however important it may be). This is supposed to be a newgroup about the Seinfeld TV show. Save your Clairol posts for alt.quit.hurting. the.fuzzy_animals.

"Karma, Kramer?"

In article , [email] says...

Though I do not personally care much about this issue (Julia is not endorsing cruelty, she is endorsing beauty product and gets paid for it. It is only by transference that one can claim that she "endorses" cruelty. If you have a problem with Clairol, then attack Clairol directly.), the point of these PETA people w/ this thread on Usenet as opposed to writing directly to NBC or Clairol is that they are trying to raise awareness of this.

Okay, PETA people, we are now aware, at least those who read this newsgroup. You can stop now. You message's merit doesn't go up by repeating yourself or what others have already said. Thanks for your comments, now raise awareness elsewhere.

drivel:

(Rest of crap snipped)

Good. Better to test animals than to harm humans.

You PETA pukes are beyond belief. Maybe you'll volunteer for testing instead.

I'm going to buy more Clairol products to support them.

(Michael Ballard ([email])) wrote:

You can't figure out what data they would be gathering with these tests? (I'll give you a big hint Mr./Ms. activist, can you say "overly litigious society"?)

Tell you what, if you can't figure out what they are really doing, perhaps you would be most productive in this society if you volunteered to have those tests preformed on yourself. (Go ahead. Get off that soapbox and do something really positive).

I don't really understand what this has to do with the show.

Regardless, MHH

Okay, here is a way that it can be proved that the writers of Seinfeld respond to feedback from Usenet. If you were a writer on the show, might not you mention to actress Julia this thread? And if so, and if Julia cared about animal testing, she might break her contract w/ Clairol and publicly state that she was informed of this "cruelty" through her writers who peruse Usenet. To me, that would be proof that the writers look at alt.tv.seinfeld.

Of course, if any of the above steps are not fulfilled, then it MIGHT be the case that the writers peruse Usenet, but the evidence then would be inconclusive...

In , Thomas Wullum writes:

Is this alt.tv.seinfeld, or is it alt.tv.seinfeld-actor.other-pursuits.treehuggers.whocares?

[email] "It's like Sweden in there, Jerry. Sweeeeeee-den!!" -Kramer-

I agree with you, although I don't know if Julia is aware of the unnecessary testing. Julia is a wonderful person and I doubt very much that she would work for anyone who does that. Certainly she would not condone it. But she just recently resigned with Clairol through 1998. Talk to her after that expires.

That's a shame.

Donovan Roderick Unks III Emperor of the Universe and Master of Time and Space MSTie # 59280

[email] (NoAskList) wrote:

Ok, I'll join in.

Julia: No more of these endorsements!

(It's probably not a major sacrifice on her part. I'm sure she'll be able to find other endorsements!)

Nah, I prefer they do the testing on animals instead of human beings. I can picture it now:

Fluffy: "Meeeooowwww" Scientist: "Now, now, Fluffy, you're going to have perfectly permed fur." Fluffy: "Meoooowwww"

At which point Fluffy becomes the spokesperson for Clairol.