http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Costanza
I wish to sincerely express my appreciation to the human being that took the time to put together this great tribute and pyscho-graphic profile of George, who was truly one of televisions most interesting personalities.
Thanks Bud, or Buddette!
Jesus H Christ what a pathetic dork. Get a fucking life.
On 18 Oct 2006 11:14:20 -0700, "projectile vomit chick" wrote:
Dear Projective Vomit Chick... without disparaging the ridiculous, even VULGAR nature of your Newsgroup handle, I would suggest to you that if you don't percieve value in the Wikipedia entry for George Costanza, than it would be appropriate to state such without verbally assaulting me for merely expressing a genuine appreciation for a job well done.
Ad hominem attacks on me, who I might add am a very nice and thoroughly capable human being (thank you,) are counter productive to you and the decorum that usually rules this particular NEWSGROUP. While your intent might have been to suggest that I was in someway niave, or a RUBE to continue to verbally lash out at people like that in the REAL world will end in misery and ultimately provide you with a spiritually bankrupt life, even creating the possibility that you would die an early death, bitter and alone.
Just don't criticize me for expressing true gratitude to the insightful, resouceful individual who put that outstanding website together. For to do so is to cast aspursions on not only me, but to the person would created the website.
Are we clear sweetie?
"Ned Goudy" wrote in message news:[email]...
doesn't she realise we are living in a society? George is getting upset. All we have to say to you love is "the jerkstore phoned and they are running out of you".
rob
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:08:11 -0700, Ned Goudy wrote:
Spoken like a true wiki-sheep. Are you SlimVirgin, by any chance?
Don't you folks waste your time on any of that wikipedia crap. It's only ever as good as the last editor to touch it. If you think it's ever going to be a stable article, you're dreaming.
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:18:46 +0100, LRod wrote:
Nope, I am not SlimVirgin by any chance.
I am trim and fit but I am happy to report that I put virginity in the past almost 40 yrs. ago.
And as with all Internet articles, consider the source... But since I am a Seinfeld junkie and know George as one of my best neurotic friends, I found the observations on his Wiki to be very astute and enlightening.
Ned
Geez give this guy a break. Did anyone read it? I would venture that most Seinfeld fans would find it interesting.
Rerics
I was about ot read it, but I just got the new issue of "Cracked"....
LRod wrote:
In this case though, it's not a factual account it's an interpretation of the character of George, so there are obviously going to be one person's bias/interpretations creeping in.
George seems to be the most complex character in Seinfeld, and there are deep human truths buried in the bravado/bluster/self deprecation articulated by the TV character. In particular the 'relationship George'/worlds colliding idea was brilliant.
LRod wrote in news:[email]:
Most Wikipedia articles have dedicated editors who protect them from vandals and misinformation. I myself help protect one.
Still, I don't know what the value is of an encyclopedia that anyone can edit.
LMAO dramatize much?
On 21 Oct 2006 14:49:32 -0700, "projectile vomit chick" wrote:
Much more thoughtful though and suggesting the appearance of wisdom and insight, than say a statement like...
"What a Dork... get a life." Eh sweety!
I mean, there is play... and then there is PLAY!
But seriously... enjoy your Internet experience projectile vomit chick!
Ned
Shouldn't you be out on a ledge or something?
On 23 Oct 2006 14:14:35 -0700, "projectile vomit chick" wrote:
No my dear. I am the one who will talk you off the ledge if that time comes. :O)
May the spirit of your understanding bless you!
Ned