Clumsy Plot-lines

Feb 26, 2002, 3:43 PM ET6 posts by 4 postersalt.tv.seinfeld
😐 Mixed
6 posts
Tod Friendlyalt.tv.seinfeld

First of all I should say that I'm sure no-one here is in any doubt that Seinfeld had some of the best writing, with some of the most complex yet smoothly intersecting plotlines in sitcom history. That's a given. But I was watching The Diplomat's Club tonight and was - as before - struck by how a major chaaracter trait was so obviously tacked-on to help on a plot-line. In this case it was Kramer's gambling problem, mentioned at the start of this episode, and never before in more than 5 series - despite the fact that we've seen Kramer gambling at least twice before (The Subway, The Contest) without repercussions. It comes up later on, to provide drama when he's gambling big money with the Texan. And AFAIK it's never mentioned again.

Another clumsy plot-line turns up in The Kiss Hello, again George's previously unknown super-hearing is mentioned at the start of the ep, and comes into play later on. Again - does that ever turn up in another ep?

Any more?

-TF

--George's over-stuffed wallet. (The Reverse Peephole)

--Elaine's "loose lips" when she drinks. (The Betrayal)

^^^^^^ "Art is often hailed as the grandest expression of human spirit, but we know now ... that the grandest expression of human spirit is whatever it takes for a man or woman to rush back into a burning building to save more people."

Tod FriendlyOzmodiaralt.tv.seinfeld

"Ozmodiar" wrote in message news:5n%e8.655$[email]...

I

how

plot-line.

that

Contest)

again.

Only seen that one once, and I don't recall - does it reference back to his "problem"? Even if so, the initial introduction of the "problem" at that stage in the series was still clumsy.

-TF

"Tod Friendly" wrote in message news:a5jcn7$3bv$[email]...

Mike becomes a bookie and says that if anyone wants to place a bet, they should see him. Kramer replies that he cannot bet because he has a disease. soon he places a bet anyway and says it's for Jerry so that he isn't the one gambling. etc.

I dont think this is clumsy. You dont have to show George, or Kramer for that matter, exhibiting their super-hearing or gambling problems all the time for them to come into play in later episodes. If Kramer is gambling, but doesn't have a problem, and then in a later ep. claims to have a problem, then i think there is

consistency. bjb