Is this an appropriate ng for posting .wavs?

Nov 26, 19976 posts by 6 posters
📌 Newsgroup

Users discuss whether posting .wav and .gif files is appropriate for the newsgroup, with consensus favoring text-only posts or providing URLs instead to avoid overwhelming the server.

6 posts
Dave

Just wondering, because the posting of .wavs and .gifs almost caused another ng I subscribe to to be removed from the server.

[email] (Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.) (Remove XXXX to reply)
zenoDave

In article , [email] wrote:

I prefer text only postings here. Not sure how others feel.

R MillerDave

On Wed, 26 Nov 1997 23:25:42 -0800, [email] (Dave Paisley) wrote, in part:

<snipped>

<snipped>

<snipped> I suggest either listing an URL to a site with a particular .wav or .jpg file or offering to email the file to anyone who would like it. Let's not mess up this group.

Rob

Point well taken.

MacAskill's Law: "We are all born libertarian heterosexual atheists." (Am I priceless or what?! "Yeah, that's one word for it.")
BarrueR Miller

or post to:

alt.binaries.sounds.tv

there are ready some Seinfeld wavs there, there are usually some new ones every Friday, of Thursday nights show.

Check out my web site at: http://members.aol.com/Barrue/index.html

[email] (Barrue) wrote:

I like collecting wavs, but I agree with everyone else - actual posts of wavs, jpgs, gifs, bmps, etc should be in alt.binaries.sounds.tv