The irony: Convicted for doing 'nothing' . . .

The irony of the entire series finale, the fab four get convicted for doing 'nothing', exactly what they've been doing over the last nine years.

I know many of you hated the show . . . . I, for one, liked the show. The only thing I would have liked to seen different is them found not guilty and ending the show sitting at Monk's coffee shop discussing some off the wall topic, as usual.

But all in all, it was a good way to end the show! I am going to miss it! Thanks for a great nine seasons.

Manny

I hated it. I would have liked to have seen... Well, nothing at all really. But since anything anything would be better than this thing, how about if they're convicted but the judge slaps them on the wrist then winks at the mom who did him in chambers?

Or how about if they stay true to their own concept instead of flipflopping in the end and repainting all their old episodes in a nasty light?

In article ,

My brother and I were thinking that a cool end to the trial would have been to have Chiles bring on Nikki (sp), the girl that Jerry dated that was very bold, as a witness for the defense. Then she would turn to the jury and say something like "Do you really have to find them guilty?" and get the whole gang off.

I see you are falling into the media trap of thinking the show is about nothing.