It's amazing how many crappy sitcoms are out there, I mean 99% of them are worthless. What is it about works of art like Seinfeld, Mash, Cheers, All in the Family etc.. that distinguishes themselves from the rest?
I have come up with to two possibilities, Character developement, and intended viewership. Who the character is, and who is selected to play it is crucial. Can anyone think of replacements for Sam Malone, Al Bundy, Peggy Bundy, Edith or Archie?
As far as viewership is concerned, I think the shows that are works of art try to appeal to everyone, by being of high-quality rather than targetive.
I am afraid Hollywood is mainly after the buck, when it realizes that crap can sometimes succeed eg. Home improvment, Freinds, (these are my opinion and I agree that it can get much worse.
Another observation is the decreasing quality of Afro-American citcoms. In the 70's, we had a work of art called Sanford and Son, and a couple of other half decent shows such as Good Times. In the last 5 years there has been this rush to get black sitcoms on the air, and the primary focus of these programs was to have Black actors, and thus any artisitc quality has been thrown out the window. Eg. Family Matters, Living Single, Martin, George, and about 20 others I can't remember.
Have we gotten this shallow? I realize I am bitching, but if we can debunk literature, we can debunk TV too. Tom