(Donald Derrick) writes:
(HghLandir) adds:
Oooh...Great comedy!
HF"I don't have a photograph, but you can have my footprints. They're upstairs in my socks."
Groucho Marx
Thread debates Elaine's sexual behavior and whether she deserves consequences; viewers defend her as entertaining and note other characters are similarly promiscuous.
(Donald Derrick) writes:
(HghLandir) adds:
Oooh...Great comedy!
HF"I don't have a photograph, but you can have my footprints. They're upstairs in my socks."
Groucho Marx
LESA TENNEY 230 ([email]) wrote:
Uh uh! She's amazing, with mannerisms and personality sublime!
Those toffee boys don't deserve her! How about the boyfriend who painted his body for New Jersey Devils games? Crazy Joe Davola? Or the manipulative therapist? Or that really slow talking annoying guy she only went out with because he didn't remember being introduced to her? Now come on, Lesa, are these mates of quality for our fair flower?
All right lets get to the heart of the matter here. Why is it wrong for Elaine to have sex with men she likes. What right does anyone have to insult or make moral judgements about the action of two consenting adults. She uses birth control, and at least since the sponge went off the market, she has obviously become more selective in who she will sleep with. What exactly is wrong with doing something that will bring pleasure to two people? I will never understand why humans continually feel the need to push their own morality onto other people. If what someone is doing doesn't interfere with your own right to life, liberty, and property, then leave them the hell alone.
Brendan W. Guy
Sorry if I overreacted here, I was stuck yesterday with several sanctimonious individuals who when they weren't telling me why the Simpsons was morally objectionable, were telling me how just about every female friend of mine was a slut. I didn't enjoy that experience and it left me in something of a bad mood, but at least they didn't have the guts to try to convince me of the evils of bisexuality again.
In article , [email] says...
[..snip..]
Yow, a little insight into your personal life. So, you're bisexual, empathize with Elaine's desire to sleep with men she likes, your sanctimonious associates think every female friend you have is a slut, and you just thought it would be nice to vent it out here in Internet land.
And I thought MY life was interesting!
-Gary K.
[email] (Gary Kline) wrote:
Well, talking about myself and venting about others are my two favorite things to do. Calvin (of Calvin and Hobbes) is one of my role models. But yes, I am bisexual, and I don't see what is wrong with a person doing something that brings pleasure to themself and someone else, and doesn't harm anyone else. Anything done between two consenting adults that doesn't harm anyone else, is nobody's business but their own. Of ocurse I recognize that others have the right to state their rude, sanctimonious opinion, just as I have the right to state my opinion that they should mind their own business. And as for me venting, well it is just something I periodically do, usually it comes out in conversation with people, or in letters to our student paper (which cravenly refuses to print my letters I might add) but now and then it comes out on the Internet as well. Isn't the advance of technology wonderful, I can now bitch to thousands of people from all over the world all at once.
Brendan W. Guy
I bet your popular with the Corps.
Remember when Elaine had a dream about a sexual encounter with a Chinese woman???? Katie Johns
I fully concur on this description of her character and I might add that she was much more attractive, both appearance and personality wise, several seasons ago.
"Don't you worry Mr. Simpson, I've argued in front of every judge in this state. Often as a lawyer."
Lionel Hutz
I must say, as a matter of opinion, that she has gotten utterly more gorgeous each season. He personality I think has varied almost more from episode to episode than season to season. Sure she has some continuity, but the situation she's in is what determines what parts of the character are exposed.
I like her this way. SEXY!!!!!!!!!
In My Opinion, Elaine is a very beautiful woman, with personality, a sense of humor, intelligence and spirit. The thing to question is how GEORGE gets all the women he gets. oh and one more thing.. i have a question for you: why so much hostility towards elaine? could it be you're a little jealous of her?
-jamie aka julia louis-dreyfus
[email] (Jamie L. Stellini) wrote:
What was that crack about George suppose to mean? I think George is cute, and he is certainly bright, and funny. I would say George is just about a match for Jerry, and considerably more attractive than Kramer. And his personality is by far the sexist of any of the characters. George may not be gorgeous (and of course he isn't), but he is charming and funny, and the way he overblows everything, it would be worth dating him just to watch his anecdotes. I at least find a good sense of humor to be very imporatant in a mate, and since the male of the species is in general not as aesthetically pleasing as the female, George can not be expected to be as pretty as most of his dates. So far, I have not seen George date anyone, that I would really consider out of his league. Realistically Nina probably was, but since I didn't find her particularily attractive, I won't count her. And as for George's other girlfriends, one had a nose the size of Staten Island, one was psychotically obsessive, the girl that was the daughter of the employment lady was considerably less attractive than George, and while Susan is pretty, I would definetly consider George to be within her league. The one possible exception would be the girl in the parking garage episode, Michelle, but then again she was a scientologist, whatever that is, and she seemed a little weird.
Brendan W. Guy
< And as for George's other girlfriends, one had a nose the size of Staten Island, one was psychotically obsessive, the girl that was the daughter of the employment lady was considerably less attractive than George, and while Susan is pretty, I would definetly consider George to be within her league.>
I don't think that Susan is anywhere near George's 'league' as you put it. George is a short, balding, individual with glasses who has a personality that consists almost solely of a fear of commitment and is neurotic and paranoid almost constantly. When contrast Susan's character to his, you can obviously see that George should consider himself very lucky and not dread his wedding date as much as he does. And, I will close by saying that for that very reason, I consider George to be an irratating fool.
"Don't you worry Mr. Simpson, I've argued in front of every judge in this state. Often as a lawyer."
Lionel Hutz
JCS21212 ([email]) wrote:
LAst time I looked the show was a *comedy* And besides, while George may not be in her league looks-wise she certainly isn't in his league personality or sense of humor-wise, and I would rate these more important in terms of long-term relationships.
what is it with all of the "george makes the perfect mate" sentiment on this thread??? george is one of the funniest characters on television, no doubt, but he is funny because he is also one of the stupidest, pathetic, integrity-less, and morally defunct characters ever written. (ever hear jerry refer to george as "biff" - it's a reference to biff loman of death of a salesman - DO YOU SEE THE CORRELATION??) George is not intentionally funny either... jason alexander & the writers intentionally make him funny. We laugh w/ jason alexander, & the writers of seinfeld but we laugh AT george costanza because he is a pathetic fool.
and i know looks aren't supposed to be an important factor for a long-term relationship, but, jesus christ people take a look at this guy! he's fat, short, balding... OH A REAL FUCKING CATCH! but, i believe these physical traits wouldn't be as noticeable if he didn't have the personality to emphasize them (which he does have).... because he is so irritatingly neurotic & paranoid, his fatness & baldness scream out at you: "jesus aren't i ugly?".
--jamie
I gotta disagree with you. Is George an alcoholic, a drug addict, is he ever violent, there are people a lot worse than George, and the characters on Seinfeld have dated most of them. So George doesn't have a lot of ambition, he is working at his dream job (the Yankees) and he is actually respected by his bosses (they were going to promote him) To be a good person, do you have to have a relentless drive for sucess at work, what is wrong with just trying to be happy in a job you enjoy? And how you can call George stupid I don't know, he is obviously very creative given the schemes he has concocted, and he is certainly an interesting person to talk to. As for pathetic, George has his problems, but no worse than anyone else on the planet, if anything his life is on the rise lately. And as for your comments on him being integrity less and morally deunct, well maybe to some extent, but certainly not less than any of the other characters, George is actually loyal to his friends (he insults them far less than they insult him) and he shoes genuine concern for the welfare of others (he thought about the security guard at that store, how many people honestly give any thought to a rent-a-cops welfare) George is a much better person than you might think.
Well, I can assure you I am a very shallow person. I will come out and state that I think looks are important. They aren't the only factor, but I believe you need to be physically attracted to your mate, and I would not date someone I didn't find attractive. And now with that said, I will reiterate that I find George attractive. He isn't fat, he's .... stocky, yeah that's it. And so he has a minor bald spot, it could be worse at least he will never get a hair cut like the one Jerry got in that episode with Edward Scissorhands. I still think that George is cute, he just needs more selfconfidance.
Brendan W. Guy
Are you worthy of the sponge???
Well, personally I find George to be rather attractive. He obviously is not gorgeous, but I find him to be cute. He is also intelligent, funny, creative, and you know you will never be bored around him. Fear of committment is common enough, and while George is neurotic and paranoid, those are two of the things I like most about him. Of course I am neurotic and paranoid as well, so I am somewhat biased, but from personal experience, I can say there are some people who enjoy being around neurotic people, people who find our stupidity charming. Maybe Susan is a person like that, her own life is fairly stable and secure, so maybe she needs someone who will get into fights with BubbleBoys and ask for exact change from her while her father's cabin is burning down. If Susan ened up with someone like herself, they would live a nice, stable, sucessful, and probably boring life, with 2.5 children and a dog. George adds energy to her life, and as I have already said it is never boring when George is around, you never know what he is going to do next. As for if George should consider himself lucky or not to be marrying her, well maybe he should, but the question isn't if Susan is better than George, the question is does George love Susan. Maybe he should, I don't know, but if he doesn't, then he shouldn't marry her, it is that simple. And if he doesn't love her now, he never will. I personally believe love is there right from the start, it is either there or it isn't, you might not realize what it is from the beginning but you know you feel something weird. And my gut feeling is that George does not love Susan, and because of that I don't think they should get married. It is nothing against Susan, I just believe you should only marry for love, and that if you marry for other reasons than you really won't be happy. Of course my own love life is completley screwed up right now, so what do I know?
Brendan W. Guy
< Well, personally I find George to be rather attractive. He obviously is not gorgeous, but I find him to be cute. He is also intelligent, funny, creative, and you know you will never be bored around him. Fear of committment is common enough, and while George is neurotic and paranoid, those are two of the things I like most about him. Of course I am neurotic and paranoid as well, so I am somewhat biased, but from personal experience, I can say there are some people who enjoy being around neurotic people, people who find our stupidity charming. Maybe Susan is a person like that, her own life is fairly stable and secure, so maybe she needs someone who will get into fights with BubbleBoys and ask for exact change from her while her father's cabin is burning down. If Susan ened up with someone like herself, they would live a nice, stable, sucessful, and probably boring life, with 2.5 children and a dog. George adds energy to her life, and as I have already said it is never boring when George is around, you never know what he is going to do next. As for if George should consider himself lucky or not to be marrying her, well maybe he should, but the question isn't if Susan is better than George, the question is does George love Susan. Maybe he should, I don't know, but if he doesn't, then he shouldn't marry her, it is that simple. And if he doesn't love her now, he never will. I personally believe love is there right from the start, it is either there or it isn't, you might not realize what it is from the beginning but you know you feel something weird. And my gut feeling is that George does not love Susan, and because of that I don't think they should get married. It is nothing against Susan, I just believe you should only marry for love, and that if you marry for other reasons than you really won't be happy. Of course my own love life is completley screwed up right now, so what do I know?>
For the record, I lodge my dissent from the premises posted here. I don't agree with much of the substantive things said and I listed my reasons before. I just feel that no post should go unanswered.
"Don't you worry Mr. Simpson, I've argued in front of every judge in this state. Often as a lawyer."
Lionel Hutz
[email] (LESA TENNEY 230) wrote:
->In article , [email] (HighFlag) writes: ->> (Donald Derrick) writes: ->> ->>>That's right! She's a slut! Is their better way to describe ->>>her character? ->> ->>
->Elaine a slut.
->Hmmmm.
->IMO, she's ugly, whiny, obnoxious, pseudo-snide. Personally I can't
->how she could get most of those men - they're usually of a much ->caliber than she is.
I don't agree at all. I think she's attractive, especially in The Gum :-) She deserves who she gets .. Definately.
In article , [email] says...
The Gum
many guys as Jerry etc get Girls..
What is the difference???????????////
Elaine a slut????
NO way!!!! She's the BEST!!!!
If Elaine is a slut, then George,Jerry and Kramer are real sleazy! (which they are not)
Katie Johns (Melbourne, Australia)
you go!!! really, i mean they all have casual sex frequently and yet you single out elaine. come on now, i thought we were past that.
and i've heard of this issue before... no, the seinfeld characters are not role models or real people for that matter they're characters.... on tv... comedic characters.... get a sense of humor for christ's sake. the point is to laugh and refrain from analyzing the social ramifications of each episode. -jamie
Tell it to Bob dole!
[email] (Jamie L. Stellini) wrote:
I mean really !
im a little dumbfounded that this argument exists
i think (and im just expressing My opinion) that elaine is the most well-written woman's character on television. its about time that a woman's character be allowed to actually enjoy sex and do something for her own pleasure. its what a lot of male characters have been doing all along - and i dont have a problem with it in either case.
they've made a point of supporting birth control on the show, which strikes me as a pretty responsible action - as opposed to the "immoral" accusations being thrown around.
im just glad that noone has tried to call her a slut On the show...
m.
I'm surprised Dan Quayle hasn't complained about Elaine yet!
not role models or real people for that matter they're characters.... : on tv... : comedic characters.... : get a sense of humor for christ's sake. : the point is to laugh and refrain from analyzing the social ramifications
You don't think that's a little harsh. She's just so great. So she's not ready to make a commitment we know Jerry isn't.
In article , [email] (Donald Derrick) writes...
I agree that they have turned Elaine into a slut this season: more risque clothing, more sex, etc. Although my boyfriend thinks Julia Louis-Dreyfuss' makeover was an improvement, I personally don't like the changes to the *character*. I miss the sweet, seemingly-innocent Elaine--when *she* came back with a scathing remark, it was *really* funny, because it seemed incongruent with her exterior.
What do others think? Beth
In article , [email] (Donald Derrick) writes...
I agree that they have turned Elaine into a slut this season: more risque clothing, more sex, etc.Yep. The show on 03/21 was a prove of it...
Although my boyfriend thinks Julia Louis-Dreyfuss' makeover was an improvement, I personally don't like the changes to the *character*.ditto.
I miss the sweet, seemingly-innocent Elaine--when *she* came back with a scathing remark, it was *really* funny, because it seemed incongruent with her exterior.Exactly.
What do others think?I think like you do! I want the old nice and sweet Elaine back.
Elaine is very fine.
give me a break. Elaine is no slut. If you have a problem with the show, then i suggest that you exercise your rights and TURN IT OFF. leave the rest of us alone to watch a show that we enjoy, and stop trying to shove YOUR morality down our throats.
Yeah, uh huh, Elaine should get AIDS or something. How bout herpes??? YOU DUMB FUCK!!!!!
On 17 Mar 1996 20:34:46 GMT, [email] (Duncan Johnson) wrote:
If I recall, this did happen with Kramer and one of Elaine's poor friends... (the one that Elaine had "controlled" most of her life, ie: suggesting she join the Army, etc.). I don't recall what came of it-- was it aborted, or what??
I think she's terrific!!!!!!!!!!!!!