Netiquette: Anyone for civilizing this newsgroup?

Oct 7, 19977 posts by 5 postersalt.tv.seinfeld
📌 Newsgroup

Thread discusses netiquette guidelines for the newsgroup, debating proper quoting practices, attributed text, and moderation standards.

7 posts

With thanks and apologies to '[email],' who wrote elsewhere these excellent comments on netiquette that, IMHO, would also benefit the Seinfeld newsgroup. It is long, but everything Ms.Gibbs says is relevant, ESPECIALLY the part about TROLLS (#7).

MsLiz

Interjecting a small point on print color. When responding to a post, make it clear who wrote what by using this symbol > located over the . on the keyboard.

>Thanks to Maggie Newman and [email].

In article , [email] wrote:

Interesting that you point out #7. 7 also includes a comment on mis-spelling words. We all know that pointing out mis-spelled words is NOT correct netiquette. So on at least one count this person creating the "rules" does not practice them too well.

In addition, for people that want a completely moderated group (read 'do it my way or no way') they need only go to Compuserve, where the television forums are extensive, very civilized, much fun and informative. You will not find 80% of the messages cross-posted to alt.sex groups etc, and in general will have to practice you communicating skills, because calling someone an idiot outright is a no-no.

The usenet will never be a CIS forum. I really wish folks would quit trying to make it that.

"The most terrifying thing is to accept oneself completely" --Jung

[email] (Dave v1.0) wrote:

Dave, here is the part of #7 on trolls which mentions misspelled words:

Where does this passage support your conclusion?

MsLiz

Thank you!!! I've been waiting for someone to verify that I'm not the ONLY one peeved at this habit of quoting the entire message, only to follow up with a short sentence-fragment of a reply.

--SS--

p.s. My newreader even flags me if > 80% of my message appears to be quoted material, warning that this is often thought of as "inconsiderate", or "bad netiquette".

In , "Sammy Salmon" writes:

But is that worse that someone who doesn't include any quoted text? (ie. A one line post saying: "Yeah! That was great!!")

Or snips incorrectly and attributes text to the wrong person? (I've been flamed for stuff I didn't write. Many of us have.) [email] (Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)

I'm with Dave on this one. Some of us have browsers that won't do what they are told. But the sophisticated among us can speed through the process effortlessly. I do agree that snipping should be judicious and forethought. It might come back to haunt you. Frank

Dave <[email] > wrote in article ...

writes:

at

Jerry said to George in the restaurant when discussing food and tv during sex:

"George, we're trying to have a civilization here!"

See, Jerry agrees with me! ; )

MsLiz [email]