Shouldn't that be Milan to Minsk?
I would think only an R rating, though.
d.a.v.e.
Fans discuss plot details from the episode, particularly questioning why George had to pay for a video rental and whether he missed explanation about a stolen tape from Jerry's car.
Shouldn't that be Milan to Minsk?
I would think only an R rating, though.
d.a.v.e.
When he returned the video after watching it a second time why did they charge George $100 or whatever ridiculous sum it was? I probably missed something that explains this.
Also George was very cool about paying up and we all know what a tight-wad he is.
Jonathan
Jonathan wrote:
Someone stole the tape from Jerry's car, so George had to pay for the tape. I'm curious, how did you miss that?
maro
Dave Adams wrote:
I don't know it's a mystery to me too! Obviously one of those missing time incidents-call in the Mulder and Scully :-)
I blame my girlfriend who isn't a Seinfeld fan. I sit there trying to watch the show and...... yada, yada, yada......end up being distracted, thus occasionally missing some of the plot details.
Jonathan
Depending on what the "distraction" is...sometimes you don't mind missing a plot or two <G>
Any scene with Puddy in it.
Rochelle, Rochelle - The rating was about 6 out 10 (on the Seinfeld scale) - not his best, but definately not his worst.
What about the "Junior Mint" episode, where the guy is having an operation and the junior mint falls into his spleen (thanks to Kramer and Jerry). That is the episode were George buys the painting to help him recover, thinking the guy will die and his painting will be worth heaps. (typical George)
We also see Jerry with a yoyo, and Kramer making his apartment into a 'log cabin' and stealing gloves from the hospital which he fondly refers to as "the mother load".
Definately a better episode, yes?
What do you think? Give this one a rating
Kerri.
In article , [email] says...
didn't it fall into his abdominal cavity?
i remember triangles. many years with the triangles.