Well, tonight's certainly wasn't as bad as last weeks, which was the worst Seinfeld ever, IMO. The "big hands" subplot was classic Seinfeld, but the rest wasn't so great. But it's *definitely* a step in the right direction.
,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,. Dave Nusair [email]
"Stevie Ray Vaughn is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi in a helicopter?" -Denis Leary ,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.
Yes, better, but the classic most people on here are making it out to be? i don't think so. IT seemed to me througout the whole show that I was watching bits of old episodes, or just slight twists on previous shows. I will laugh out loud at the best episodes; this one got just a few smiles out of me. The kind of thing where you say "That's funny," but you don't laugh.
Bob Wells
Bob Wells wrote:
How does your roommate react?
What are you talking about?
I thought the October 3 episode of Seinfeld was terrible. All three so far have been mediocre at best. The show is hurting. There's no momentum in the new ones, noflow.
[email] (David Nusair) wrote:
I don't know what the problem is that everyone had with the "Pam" episode last week. The scene in the library was hilarious - the whole Cyrano thing's been done to death, but I can't remember seeing it done so well, especially when Newman's 'postal pride' gets going. The "Bizzaro Jerry" episode was even better.
In article , [email] (David Nusair) wrote:
Come on it was more than just a step in the right direction! How could you not like the bizarro thing? and George was right back to his old ridiculous plots.