One of the few reasons I started watching Seinfled is because of Julia Louis- Dreyfus. Is she HOT or am I just blind. starman
Is it just me or is Julia HOT
Fans discuss Julia Louis-Dreyfus's attractiveness, with most agreeing she is attractive and noting her appearance in various outfits throughout the series.
she is definitely attractive. especially the episodes where she has straight hair...I wouldn't mind getting into a cat fight with her *growl*
STARMAN wrote:
Taste is a matter of taste, but the first time I saw her was in a tight outfit in a Saturday Night Live skit. She looked yummy there. The way she dresses in Seinfeld makes it hard for me to judge.
I think modern clothes for professional women are designed to make them look like short men with longer hair.
"Verpleeg" wrote in message news:[email]...
Louis-
outfit
dresses
She looked amazing in that leotard.
She has a cute face, but she's not sexually attractive and doesn't evoke sexual feelings.
Blasphemy! I think you "do not like Seinfeld and do not understand sex". ;-)
But I have eyes.
Maybe you should get them checked, I think glasses or laser surgery may help.(LOL) starman
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 03:30:51 GMT, "John Twernbold" wrote:
You know, sexual attraction is very subjective. Proof: some men have slept with me!
Sophie
........hey Sophie maybe you've got it .......you know 'shicks appeal' !!!
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:59:08 GMT, [email] (jesus fish) wrote:
I always thought it was the flannel pajamas and the big wall of hair, face like a frying pan.
Sophie
She does for me. starman
That is part of the appeal for me I think, plus O love the way she looks in those glasses starman
Shes fine, but I'm not sure about hot. I started watching Seinfeld, because in the early stages I could sense it was not going to be your average comedy series.
"Darren Perrett" wrote in news:5lR47.4377$[email]:
.............. oh she's 'hot' .....she sent me an xmas card !....
jesus fish wrote in message ...
Yeahbut... you should have seen what she did to me when I complained about 'not getting a card'!!!!
homerr.. bachelor#3
I'm a girl and I think she's really cute.
Thank you, now that is a honest answer starman
"STARMAN" wrote in message news:[email]...
Louis-
I think she's very attractive--certainly so in the later seasons. In the early seasons it seems as if they almost tried to dull her down. She looked way too "old-fashioned" back then for the character Elaine--e.g. her hair style and those long, ugly dresses they typically had her in. It just did not look hip, hot, and 90's NY to me.
In the later seasons she took on much more of a "professional" and modern look it seems--which I much prefer. Her hair style greatly improved along with more flattering make-up and dress. (The little black CK number certainly comes to mind--the one she wore outside... :)
But that's just my opinion...
--Todd Wheeling
I always wondered her pyjamas. I mean she's sexually quite open person, but she always wore some kind of mumu or something. Is it so cold at night in NY? Where were all the lingeries?
I don't know what the custom is in Finland (or in your imagination :-P ), but here in the US (and in the real world) the average woman doesn't wear sexy lingerie every night, especially when sleeping alone.
That look peaked out in the late 70s, early 80s as the "Annie Hall" look. The babushka hair style was some- thing unto itself, but the outfit was Diane Keaton.
The straight and then curly hair styles were the most flattering. She had that business look down in "Day By Day," a comedy series which ran one season in 88 -89. Her character, Eileen Swift, was sort of a less neurotic Elaine out of the city and obsessed about her job, IIRC.
Louis-
When women are funny, they loose their sex-appeal... It's just a fact! So the question should be; is she funny? if not, she's hot!
/Stefan
Funny can be sexy! I'm funny!!! Don't dismiss, you are too quick to dismiss!!!!
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:17:41 +0100, "Jupiter's Moon" wrote:
But if you're a man, then funny is sexy. There is an Irish (?) proverb that says something like "When you make a woman laugh, her pants are half off" or something.
(No wonder I'm so easy.)
Sophie
If I make a women laugh that means that she thinks that I'm funny, and that makes her sexy! But if she makes me laugh...hmmm...nope...sorry!
/Stefan
"The Man of Purpose" wrote in message news:hHB57.5452$[email]...
that
So I drop my pants, and she laughs even more....
"The Man of Purpose" wrote in message news:hHB57.5452$[email]...
that
<<,So I drop my pants, and she laughs even more....
Were you in the pool?
Stefan, you are ruining my life. I was with a guy friend last night and every time I made him laugh I told myself "that's it, I'm never getting lucky again".
Sophie
"Sophie" wrote in message news:[email]...
I wouldn't worry. Although I take the point Stefan was making I don't think it has much validity in real life. On TV "funny" attractive women are often required to play roles that show them to be goofy, self-deprecating or disorganised - e.g. Rachel and Phoebe on friends, Daphne on Frasier, Brooke Shields in Suddenly Susan. In a Seinfeld context Elayne was perhaps funniest when she did her physical comedy bits like rolling around on the bed in Jerry's parents house, or snapping her leotard on herself and she certainly wasn't sexy then.
So yes if you're making the guy laugh by acting a ditz, getting falling-over drunk on 2 glasses of wine or talking about wacky your premonitions then it's probably time to change tack. :) But in RL speaking for myself, women who make me laugh do it by being witty and intelligent, even light-heartedly bitchy. And *that* in no way counts as a turn-off. The problem is not the humour itself but that it's often couched in circumstances where a woman shows herself to be lacking in self-confidence and know-how when perhaps the sexiest quality to find in a woman is a *lot* of self-confidence.
I should also say that the original rule does not apply to women writers in my experience. Helen Fielding, Carrie Fisher, Zoe Heller e.g. are all attractive women who can be hilarious on the page, largely because they don't have to belittle themselves to do so. So while in part Stefan is right, it's a rule with a hell of a lot of exceptions.
Tod and Mike... I believe the correct pronunciation is "m�nage � trois"?
Sophie
"Sophie" wrote in message news:[email]...
I'd need to see a photo before I consented.
I mean of Mike obviously. :)
Sophie wrote:
I can't. I'm not an orgy guy. Don't you know what it means to become an orgy guy? It changes everything. I'd have to dress different. I'd have to act different. I'd have to grow a mustache and get all kinds of robes and lotions and I'd need a new bedspread and new curtains I'd have to get thick carpeting and weirdo lighting. I'd have to get new friends. . . . I'd have to get orgy friends. ... Naw, I'm not ready for it.
"TheNewsGuy(Mike)" wrote in message news:[email]...
If only something like that could happen to *me*!
I totally agree with you Tod!
/Stefan
think
often
Brooke
no
to
in
Hehe, I'm sorry Sophie. It's just the facts of life...
/Stefan
"Sophie" wrote in message news:[email]...
I've got to tell you, I'm Irish and I've never heard that before. And as a historically Catholic nation we're unlikely to have any proverbs that relate to a woman's pants. :)
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001 19:33:06 +0100, "Tod Friendly" wrote:
It might be scottish, I thought it was from somewhere in the UK but I'll check again with the guy who told me because "it's just so frustrating".
Sophie
Knock, knock....
Here is how i'd like to see her.........
http://members5.clubphoto.com/felix336563/Demo_Album/photo51.jpg?6748
"YANKSin5" wrote in news:C1167.74818$qs5.14252959 @news02.optonline.net:
........just remember it's like lookin' at the sun......just get a glimpse ,
then look away ........