Irregularities . . .

Sep 1, 2001, 12:28 PM ET8 posts by 6 posters
Question

Fans discuss technical irregularities in episodes, including whether Jerry's millennium correction to Newman is accurate and the meaning of a dream reference in The Van Buren Boys.

8 posts
Clint Dempster

At the moment I'm converting all of my recorded Seinfeld episodes to VCD, so they'll be preserved for as long as I'm going to need them - CD's last a hundred years you know. I've been watching the episodes as I copy them over and I've got a couple of questions . . I'd be grateful if someone could help.

1. In "The Millenium" at the end Jerry gives Newman notice that the millenium is actually 2001. He says "one year late, thus - quite lame" - shouldn't it be one year early? I'm confused?

2. In "The Van Buren Boys" George finds a candiate for the Susan Ross scholarship, who is a younger him. Later in the coffee shop Jerry says to George "Last night I dreamt the hamburger was eating me" - Does this mean anything?

Thanks,

Clint

NickClint Dempster

"Clint Dempster" wrote:

It took me a while to get this, too. Apparently if Newman reserved it for the millennium then he has it for 2001 rather than 2000. Still seems really stupid, but that's the only thing that made sense to me.

Haven't seen this episode in a while and I don't remember that.

John MohrClint Dempster
  • Clint Dempster

Newman is going to have his party on New Year's Eve 2000, one year later than everybody else.

I guess it shows how simple-minded and self-centered he his.

John MohrJohn Mohr
  • John Mohr

Of course this was not his intention, but as there was no year 0, the new millenium didn't start before January 1st 2001 (Jerry's reasoning).

Scott PClint Dempster

On Sun, 2 Sep 2001 02:28:56 +1000, "Clint Dempster" wrote:

Actually based on what Jerry was saying, "a year too late" is correct. Jerry points out to Newman that he called and reserved a room for the "Millennium New Years Eve" (not specifying the date). Since there was no year zero, Millennium New Years Eve is (was) technically December 31, 2000. Since the day everyone is going to celebrate is (was) December 31, 1999, Newman's reservation is a year too late.

That Jerry is self centered and immature and couldn't care les about George's problems..

Scott

Andrew CameronClint Dempster

Clint Dempster wrote in message ...

This old chestnut. Some people think Jerry is wrong and some, like me, think Jerry is right. Newman thinks he's booked the party for Dec 1999 when really he asked for the "millenium" and so got Dec 2000 (since there was no year zero and all that). However, since the official meaning of "the millenium" is so skewed, I reckon that Newman would at least have grounds to question the restaurant's definition, and maybe even get his party on Dec 1999. Not that we will ever know if he did.

No, I think he was just taking the piss out of George.

Tags: af #1730 (remove LOVENUT to reply) EAC Paradox Division -- "i've been too honest with myself
DaveAndrew Cameron

I lobe when he does that.

Classic example.

"Look! There's Barbara Mandrell's skateboard! And Gregory Peck's bicycle!!"

Dave (loooooved "The Mom and Pop Store".)