I think it's a bit more involved than just that. Seinfeld has more depth to it than most people would realise and so there would be more factors to judge other shows by, such as, the actual relationships between the characters; the storylines; whether the shows have a certain amount of allegory (ie. try to moralise or preach to you, whether it's in an overt or covert way); where they live and what they do (ie. big city vs rural town, professional vs blue-collar worker); the demographics of the characters (ie. all white/black/asian, all male/female/mixture, all young/middle aged/old etc.). These shows may or may not share these and other characteristics in common with Seinfeld, but as I said you can't compare them on just one factor.
And for these shows to be clones would imply that they're also as funny as Seinfeld, which isn't the case, but maybe I'm taking the word too literally.
Just a few thoughts.
Brendan Bugeja
On Sat, 5 Apr 1997, joro wrote: