DVD latest

Feb 27, 2004, 5:39 PM ET16 posts by 11 posters
📰 News

Dispute over DVD royalties between Seinfeld cast and producers is resolved, allowing official DVD collection release with all four cast members participating

16 posts
Jan Buxton

From http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20040227/SEI NFELD27/TPTechinvestor/

Pact brings peace to the Seinfeld cast Resolution of a bitter conflict over royalties clears the way for the release of a DVD collection

By MATTHEW KALMAN Special to The Globe and Mail Friday, February 27, 2004 - Page R2

JERUSALEM -- Amultimillion-dollar dispute over royalties between Jerry Seinfeld and the three co-stars of his long-running television comedy series has finally been settled, allowing the release of an official DVD collection of the show's 180 episodes, plus newly filmed interviews and other material.

In an exclusive interview with The Globe and Mail, Jason Alexander (who played George Costanza on Seinfeld) said a deal "has very recently been worked out" after months of tension.

Describing the comedy star's behaviour over money as "inappropriate," Alexander said that he, Julia Louis-Dreyfus (Elaine) and Michael Richards (Kramer) had refused to provide extra material for the DVD collection because Seinfeld and Castle Rock Television, which produced the series for NBC, refused to pay them or offer a share in the royalties.

He said the Seinfeld producers have now agreed that the three co-stars will also earn royalties from the DVD collection.

"We are currently in negotiations so that we are participants in the DVD and that's a happy arrangement because we didn't really want to create this sort of negative impression of our experience," said Alexander, who has just ended a nine-month run in a theatre production of The Producers in Los Angeles.

Michael Richards broke ranks in December and agreed to work on the DVD.

"I innocently asked a question, 'Is there some compensation?' I don't believe there is," Richards told The New York Times.

A similar dispute nearly scuttled the last series of the nine-year-long show. The three co-stars have no share in the royalties, which have netted Seinfeld more than a billion dollars.

Alexander said the three co-stars decided to get tough during negotiations for the final series in 1997. They told NBC Entertainment chief Warren Littlefield that Jerry Seinfeld's decision to cut them out of the show's massive royalties had created an unacceptable gap between the actors.

They did manage to raise their fee for the final series to the same level as Seinfeld himself -- about $1-million an episode -- but Alexander said it was done with a heavy heart.

"We made a deal that was acceptable to us. We got paid very handsomely for our final season," he said. "It was in the pool of profit for NBC to give us those salaries.

"We weren't asking for something that wasn't there, but it was still inappropriate. It drove the cost of production of a TV show sky-high.

"I remember saying to Warren Littlefield: 'We're not kidding and we deserve this, but you're an idiot if you make this deal. It'll destroy television.' "

Alexander said the three co-stars would have greatly preferred "back-end participation" -- a share in royalties from future profits, rather than taking such huge salaries up-front.

"Julia, Michael and I, during our big renegotiation for the final year, asked for something that I will go to my grave saying we should have had, and that is back-end participation in the profits for the show.

"It was categorically denied to us, which forced us to then ask for ungodly salaries," he said.

"We make very little, standard Screen Actors Guild residuals for the reruns," he said.

"I'm not ashamed to talk numbers. I would say in the years that we've been in syndication, Julia, Michael and I have probably individually seen about a quarter of a million dollars out of residuals, whereas our brethren have seen hundreds of millions of dollars. Seinfeld has a profit of over a billion dollars."

"When the DVDs came up, we were being asked to provide new services," he said. "We had no problem with the DVDs being released, but then they said, 'We want you to perform new services. We want to do interviews and create additional footage and additional material.' Why would we do that? They said, 'Because of the legacy of the show.'

"Well, the character of George is not a millstone around my neck but I had to turn to my former bosses and say, 'I'm not invested in the longevity of the show. The longevity of the show actually is a detriment to me right now. It keeps me from getting certain kind of work. You have not made me a participant in the life of this show, therefore I am not inclined to give you these services.'

"It took a while for them to understand. Frankly, I think they were well prepared to proceed without our services until the audience said, 'Don't do that.'

"I said to Jerry when he made the decision years ago to not let us in, 'The day will come when you regret this decision, only because it's going to put us in a position eventually of seemingly tainting the wonderful impression of what this was for the four of us.

"You have created a rift between you and the three of us, and while we are in no way, shape or form looking for parity with you, you have created a chasm that is also inappropriate,' " Alexander recalled.

Jan "A lot of people are very critical of modern reproductive processes without fully understanding all the ins and outs." Lord Winston
CNDAJan Buxton

"Jan Buxton" wrote in message news:c1ogvi$u9p$[email]...

http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20040227/SEI

Wow! It always comes down to the same thing, money.

C�sar.

"I should have been a butcher like my brother, you make a mistake with a cow, you move on with your life".

Charles Levin as The Mohel in "The Bris"

poldyCNDA

A billion dollar in profits. In Curb Your Enthusiasm, a reference is made to $500 million. Has it grown that much in a couple of years?

BTW, I don't blame the others for wanting a bigger piece of the pie. Yes they didn't create the show but they were responsible for the success. Sure the scripts were the main thing but they were better performers in comparison to Seinfeld's straight man role.

craigpoldy

I think there is a simple answer to that: Most actors sign a seven year contract when a series first starts. It is a standard contract that spells out what the actors are entitled to during the course of its term. Actors have little negotiating power to alter its terms at the start because no one knows whether the show will become a hit and most actors (unless already big stars, in which this entire answer is meaningless) are simply grateful to be under the standard network contract.

Once a show becomes successful, it is not at all unusual for the pay raises specified in the original deal to be ripped up and the actors are given huge raises, but rarely are they given a piece of the show. A notable exception to this was "Friends", where the actors all put on a united front. They all agreed to walk out after 4 or 5 years unless they were given profit participation. It is fair to say that is what Jason Alexander was referencing when he told the network they were making a mistake by giving big salaries in lieu of back end participation.

Note that after the first seven years of Seinfeld the three co-stars did threaten to walk, but instead got one-year deals with a big pay bump (from 300k per ep to, if I recall, 650k). The last season they made the mentioned 1 million per episode, which at the time was ground breaking money.

"poldy" wrote in message news:[email]...

unknowncraig

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 13:00:14 GMT, "craig" wrote:

1 Million dollars per EPISODE?!?!   That's disgusting.  Did you know
there are baseball  players that have to work all season to get that
much?    :-)

Nope, I have no sympathy for Jason and the others. They got a lot more than they ever dreamed of doing that show. They were very well paid for what they contibuted.

      +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   +      The News Guy(Mike) - Seinfeld Lists
   +            (two mirrored sites)
   +        http://membres.lycos.fr/tnguym
   +        http://waveprohosting.com/tnguym
   +    All things Seinfeld; scripts, trivia, lists,
   +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Norman Schwartzunknown

"The News Guy(Mike)" wrote in message news:[email]...

But they spent it all and now need more.

ErNorman Schwartz

"Norman Schwartz" wrote in message news:Ta31c.64819$[email]...

Sounds like it is time for a reunion show!

Er

poldyunknown

In article , [email] (The News Guy(Mike)) wrote:

They got paid well but the producers of the show made a lot more than they ever dreamed, in part due to the contributions of the cast.

Erpoldy

"poldy" wrote in message news:[email]...

I believe the actors have no business quibbling over the past payment structure (which they are not, only this ng is!) since those contracts were signed and approved by all parties, including the actors.

They can, however, 'request' whatever they want for the new work (the DVD interviews). It is a free country and one can ask for compensation for new, upcoming work, to be performed. Doesn't make anyone greedy (for asking), or cheap (for refusing). It is work, and people want to be paid. Simple. I think they (or any actor doing these types of things) *should* be paid for the work: they put in the time, they should get the money.

Now, *how much* of the money, is another question... I tell you, they're not stupid for asking A LOT. I would.

"I'm affraid we're going to have to let you go" "I don't even work here!"

Er

Ryan Boniunknown

Hear, hear!!! Couldn't agree more, Mike! While I appreciate Jason, Michael & Julia's talents, they were already paid for their services on the show.

If you take a look at all of the shows on networks like TV Land, shows that have been living on in syndication forever, how often do you think the actors are getting a large percentage of that?? It's the producers who front the money for production and should be entitled to recoup the costs.

And when you get right down to it, when you ask most people why they liked Seinfeld, most people top their list with "the writing". And guess what, the writers get nothing more either!!! A writer gets paid for a script and that's usually it!

Oh well, it's all settled now I guess, I really hope they (Jason, Michael & Julia) bowl us over with their unbelievable contributions to the DVD sets!!! (I still would've been fine with Jerry & Larry doing all of the interviews and some commentary!!!)

BTW, drove out to Wheeling, WV last night to check out Jerry's show--THE MAN still has it!!!! Great show!!!

Ryan

"The News Guy(Mike)" wrote in message news:[email]...

dabriggCNDA

"Well, if it isn't Shaky The Mohel"

"I should have been a butcher like my brother, you make a mistake with a cow, you move on with your life".

Charles Levin as The Mohel in "The Bris"

CNDAdabrigg

wrote in message news:[email]...

with a

That's my favorite episode ( The Bris). I think Charles Levin should have been nominated for an"Emmy for his portrayal of the nervous mohel.

C�sar.
NooneJan Buxton

In article , [email] says...

I do understand their reluctance to do sort of free work just to make more money to someone else's pockets, but what I don't understand is their demands to get the royalties from the show. And why they started to demand royalties just when the show was in it's last season? If they saw the potential of the show early on, they could've participated more on the intellectual property of the show, like writing and producing, thus earning a piece of the spoils. It's useless to demand more money when the work is already done.

craigNoone

I think there is a simple answer to that: Most actors sign a seven year contract when a series first starts. It is a standard contract that spells out what the actors are entitled to during the course of its term. Actors have little negotiating power to alter its terms are the start because no one knows whether the show will become a hit and most actors (unless already big stars, in which this entire answer is meaningless) are simply grateful to be under the standard network contract.

Once a show becomes successful, it is not at all unusual for the pay raises specified in the original deal to be ripped up and the actors are given huge raises, but rarely are they given a piece of the show. A notable exception to this was "Friends", where the actors all put on a united front. They all agreed to walk out after 4 or 5 years unless they were given profit participation. It is fair to say that is what Jason Alexander was referencing when he told the network they were making a mistake by giving big salaries in lieu of back end participation.

Note that after the first seven years of Seinfeld the three co-stars did threaten to walk, but instead got one-year deals with a big pay bump (from 300k per ep to, if I recall, 650k). The last season they made the mentioned 1 million per episode, which at the time was ground breaking money.

"Noone" wrote in message news:[email]...

Vagina DentataJan Buxton

<snip> Alexander said the three co-stars would have greatly preferred "back-end participation"

<snip>

There's a phrase to conjure with

VD

dabriggJan Buxton

"A deep yawning chasm"

Jan Buxton wrote: