Uh oh

Who is going to cry racism about tonights episode?

On an unrelated matter.......Why does the previous message show up as 28 lines on my browser and confirmed when I checked the source ???!!!

    As you noticed by looking at the message source it actually has 28
lines of text that includes both a "plain" and an "html" section. The
HTML section contains the bulk of the line count since it includes
formatting information. Also in each part of this "multi-part" message
there are statements to indicate content type and encoding method.
    An email/news program (like Outlook Express that was used to create
that message) is capable of creating and displaying HTML documents (like
web pages) but the plain text section is included for readers that don't
support html. Otherwise they would have to wade through all the
formatting statements to find the raw text.

Terry

Frank wrote in message ...

28

Nov.

I don't think anyone (well, maybe I should say I don't think most) will cry racism over this episode, to tell the truth. I think it will be obvious to most that it was an innocuous stab at political correctness and race relations and was just trying to give exposure to some cool comedy ideas. It's something which can occur in real life, a mildly amusing something, no different than Jerry trying to figure out what his girlfriend's name rhymes with or George talking about the deal we had with the pigeons.

Just some quick commentary about tonight's episode: it was a good outing, but not a superior or inspired one, based solely on one characteristic: balance. The segments were not balanced correctly; each one was dealt with in skeletal form, as if they were meant to be very finite sketches with no skin/bones attached. All of the different segments could have exhibited more energy and more quantity in getting to their final purposes. Also, there was no real symbiosis among the various plots; yes, there was some, but it was miniscule in nature- after watching tonight's episode, I'm certain most constant viewers will agree to the lack of that satisfactory feeling one gets when a good SEINFELD ties it all together at the conclusion with skilled precision.

I hope all the critics of this show will be crying "THE SHOW IS NOT AS FUNNY AS IT WAS" when it is off the air. I have a feeling that in 2 years when everyone sees these last two seasons in syndication they will think WoW these were pretty funny. Those people who rip the show now probably ripped it years back. People who really like the show can realize if you start analyzing every detail of the show you have missed the show entirely. It always took chances with ridiculous stories. Its a shame it is still not appreciated like it should be. However, I have a funny feeling next year at this time it will be!!!!

SLGbchh wrote in article ...

cry

to

relations

something

than

George

outing, but

balance.

skeletal

and

real

miniscule in

viewers

In article , "mcfly" wrote:

I saw most of the shows on syndication 3 or 4 times already. I've analyzed every detail of those shows, and they are still damn funny. Tonight's episode was boring the first time, and I doubt very much I'll find it funnier 2 years from now.