Fans celebrate Seinfeld's sweep at the Comedy Awards with Jerry, Jason Alexander, and Julia Louis-Dreyfuss winning, debating why Michael Richards wasn't nominated in the same category.
i did post an announcement about the awards on 3/1 but i didn't want to spoil the surprise for other seinfeld fans. it was on last night. if you missed it, your best bet is to start looking for people who videotape it. jerry and JLD opened the show and presented an award. jason alexander presented an award as well. unfortunately michael richards was nowhere to be seen, though jason did call him the best guy around when it comes to pure comedy. --- later, sunil
Hey all, I saw the award show last night and it was, at least at times, quite funny. But is it just me or do award shows( and I mean all incl. the oscars, grammy, etc awards), get unbearable sappy. Especially when it comes to "Lifetime Achievement" awards and the like. The feature they showed about Billy Crystal was so sappy and sweet and - oh man I wanted to puke. Don't get me wrong, I like Billy a lot, although "Mr. Saturday Night" was one of the worst movies I have seen in a long time, but this 'celebrating each others greatness and kissing each others butts' that is going on in these award shows makes me sick.
Well, at least three of my favorite comedians got awards (JLD,JS,JA) but why wasn't the loathsome brute (KRAMER) not even nominated??? Go figure.
And how about Joe Pesci's 'very unrehearsed' reaction? Although he definetely deserved the award!!
Let's hope tonight's Seinfeld episode is going to be better than the Awards that honored it...
Joerg 'SPROCKETS' Grau | [email]
"Ambition is the last refuge of the failure"
(Phrases and Philosophies for the Use of the Young by oscar wilde)
Well there's at least one reason: there's only one winner and Jason Alexander and Michael Richards are the only two of the four that fall into the same catagory.
I didn't watch the whole show, but amazingly the the two times I got home when it was still on I saw JA and JLD win as soon as I came in the door.
I'm glad JS did so well at the Comedy awards, and I do like George as a character on the show. However I feel that Kramer should have won for best supporting male for the following reason,
The Kramer character could carry his own spin-off show while George could not.
:for best supporting male for the following reason, : :The Kramer character could carry his own spin-off show while George :could not. : :Wayne Langan :[email]
I agree, he should have won, but not because he "could carry his own spin-off show". To say that a supporting character can be a good lead character doesn't merit them the award for the supporting role!
-Rob
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The opinions expressed in this article may or may not be based on fact,
fiction, characters or events (real or imaginary), reality, truth, or logic.
So, deal with it.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| \ _ |_ Robert M. Shearman, Jr. E-Mail: [email]
=-= |_/ / \ | \ University of Maryland "WILL WORK FOR
| \ \_/ |_/ College Park, Maryland CHOCOLATE"
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
"I'm not just the president of Chocoholics Unanymous, I'm also a client."
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I could argue with you Rob, but the award was introduced as "Funniest male in
a supporting role in a television series" (paraphrased)
So that raises the question of why Kramer didn't win the award??
Is there anyone on tv at the moment, leading or supporting, male or female,
who is as funny as Kramer??? If you say yes let me know and I will reply
by quoting the funniest person on tv, KRAMER, by saying
"I beg to differ..."
loathsome brute forever
Joerg 'SPROCKETS' Grau | [email]
"Only the shallow know themselves"
(Phrases and Philosophies for the Use of the Young by oscar wilde)
:for best supporting male for the following reason, : :The Kramer character could carry his own spin-off show while George :could not. : :Wayne Langan :[email]
I know that this has been discussed before, but I can't seem to help myself.
I don't think that Kramer could carry his own spin-off! Too much of a good thing can make you sick! He has the best impact when taken in small doses. If I were subjected to an entire half hour of just Kramer, it would get old REAL fast. The other characters on the show help to point out how different and goofy Kramer really is. If it weren't for the others *almost* normal attiudes and reactions, then Kramer's reactions wouldn't be nearly as funny.
I also feel that Kramer should have won; ask most people who their favorite character on the show is and the answer is Kramer. However, as for spin-off show featuring Kramer on a weekly basis, I honestly don't know. Personally, the Kramer character has evolved to a state of near perfection on Seinfeld, and I think that things should remain as they are.
What?? Kramer in a spinoff? Who would he play off of then? What makes Kramer hysterical is the fact that he is the "oddball" among the group. [of course this is relative].
Don't make sweeping generalizations about other people's likes or dislikes. Everyone I know who watches Seinfeld names George as their favorite character and feels that Kramer is great in small doses.
So some people like one, some the other. Who cares. They're both great and they both deserved the award.