Kramer said they have nothing to worry about because Jackie never loses. But when has Jackie ever won? Also, Jackie never cross examined any witnesses and never even stated a case for the defense other than the opening statement about how there is no such thing as a guilty bystander. I think he is the most overrated lawyer in television history:) Kramer is way to high on him.
Jackie Chiles
May 15, 19984 posts by 4 posters
🙁 Disliked it🔥 Controversial
4 posts
On Fri, 15 May 1998 19:15:43 GMT, [email] (GP MVP) wrote:
I think that is symptomatic of Kramer's problem. His opinions often don't gibe with reality.
Jackie kicks ass. The best Cameo man since Jack Palance in City Slickers. I woul like to see him on Law and Order or the Practice. Jackie rules.
In a previous article, [email] (GP MVP) says:
Well, it's not like Kramer necessarily knew anything about ... anything.
Exactly! "A lifetime of cappucinos???" Indeed! Hahahaha
Excellent point! And just which Ethical Consideration do you think he failed to take into account in modeling his courtroom conduct?
I agree.