I say let's boycott NBC for bowing to the flag-whiners and apologizing!
But not until after next Thursday, of course.
p.s. if we burned EVERY flag, we might have a more peaceful world.
Fans debate NBC's apology for the Puerto Rican Day Parade episode's flag-burning scene, with some defending the comedy while others criticize those offended by the joke.
I say let's boycott NBC for bowing to the flag-whiners and apologizing!
But not until after next Thursday, of course.
p.s. if we burned EVERY flag, we might have a more peaceful world.
Guy Ridley wrote in message ...
Lets burn the OLD Glory on the next show!!!!!!!!
If it was done in comedy, then go for it. You, and the rest of your anal friends are so fucking stupid. Look at this example:
Kramer was enjoying the Puerto Rican culture when he ACCIDENTALLY set the flag on fire. This was a joke.
Those damn Iraqis set the American Flag on fire in demonstration and protests because they hate us Americans. That was serious.
Can't you see the difference? Stop taking everything out of context.
Hey, Don Jaun. Just remember this. Some people are never really happy unless they're pissed off about something. If calling for a boycott is what Francisco needs to keep him happy, who are we to argue.
On Sun, 10 May 1998 18:51:50 -0400, "Francisco J Isern" wrote:
I think most people who found the burning flag incident funny would have found it just as funny had Kramer been at a Veteran's Day parade and accidently started Old Glory on fire. Vets and patriots would chase him down and trash Jerry's car. That would have been hilarious and I doubt American citizens and veterans would have been offended. Sure there are a few anal jerks who would not have seen the humor, but who cares about them.
GP MVP wrote:
I agree completely. I would have thought it was funny no matter *what* flag it was.
Now, suppose instead of the Puerto Rican Day Parade, it was a St. Patrick's Day parade, and Kramer had set the Irish flag on fire, and was chased by a mob of angry Irishmen? I'm part Irish, and I wouldn't have been offended in the least. I would have still laughed either way.
And what about episode #62, "The Handicapped Spot?" George parks his car in a handicapped spot, and his car is destroyed by an angry mob. Now I may be wrong, but I believe that most (if not all) of the people in the mob were white. I don't recall anybody complaining that this episode made whites look bad by portraying them as an angry mob, yet it was practically the same action taken by the mob in "The Puerto Rican Day."
And people may be forgettting that practically *everyone* on Seinfeld looks bad. Even the four main characters are portrayed as selfish, petty and greedy. Now if the four main characters look bad, why should we expect anyone else to be portrayed positively? Now, if Seinfeld was a show full of loving, warm, nice people, but Puerto Ricans were portrayed as rioters, then I could see a reason for people to complain. But since the Puerto Ricans were portrayed as no better or worse than any of the other characters that have been on the show in the past 9 years, I don't see a problem.
Just My Humble Opinion, Jaclyn
I'm tired of hearing from people who claim to speak for all of us. I agree with Guy Ridley. I am a Puerto Rican and was not offended in the least by this episode. I think these whiners do much more to harm the image of a particular group than a show like this. To those that were offended speak for yourselves and lighten up!!
GP MVP wrote in message ...
Never mind boycotting NBC for Kramer's flag-burning. I'm still boycotting the FOX network for that Simpsons episode when Homer wipes his face with the Stonecutters' society's Sacred Parchment.
[email]
(Attention all morons: I'm being sarcastic.)
LOL!