Real Last Episode Plot

DISCLAIMER: If you do NOT want to know what happens on the last show, should you prefer to be surprised then read no further.

OK. You've been warned.

Here it is, the basic outline.

Harkening back to the premise of Jerry trying, from the beginning, to land a sitcom, the last episode begins with the news that his "show about nothing" has been picked up.

Jerry, George, Elaine, and Kramer hopt a plane for Los Angeles to further this move towards actually making the show. Shortly after leaving, however, the plane they are on must make an unanticipated stop in Massachusettes (it's Kramer's fault, that is all I know as to WHY this happened). While in a town in Massachusettes, the four of them happen to encounter a car-jacking. While one of them films the car-jacking the others make wry comments about the nature of a car-jacking.

Others see this happening and when the police arrive on the scene the four are charged under the new Princess Diana law that says you cannot take photos/videotape at the scene of an accident/crime when there there are lives in danger.

Charged with this crime, the four of them get a jury trial. This trial is the premise used by the show's writers to reintroduce/have flashbacks with some of the major guest-stars (i.e Terri Hatcher, Keith Hernandez). These people appear during the trial as character witnesses *against* the cast!

The secretly-taped final endings revolve around whether the group is acquitted, charged, hung jury, whatever. Well, they end up being guilty--not just of the crime but of generally belittling and harming the lives of so many guest stars.

There it is. Don't ask how I learned this. Birds whisper. The above is fact. Hope you enjoyed it!

Well, as an entertainment writer that has seen the final episode, I would just like to ask you why in the hell would you think of such a lame plot. Come on, you could do better. As to the real plot, I'm not saying, but you weren't even close.

K. Kispert wrote in message ...

In article , "Tony Solis" wrote:

Okay, Mr. Entertainment Writer, you're on. One hundred dollars says I am right and you are wrong. How lame and phony of you to claim that you were at the taping when you obviously were not. The "lame plot" is the plot that much of America will be talking about with excitement for some time after the last episode.

I didn't know that all Entertainment Writers (what is that exactly?) got to go to the last show. A perk of the job, no doubt.

Hail Tony Solis, entertainment writer: Are we to believe you know the plot of the final episode? Declare such or we call your bluff. Tell us the plot as you claim you know. There is nothing stopping you except that you're lying. You only wish you knew. Are you going to wait for the episode and tell us you were right? You are an entertainment writer, all right. Hail Tony We're waiting Tony

Tony Solis wrote:

Call me what you will, but yes I do know the plot of the final episode. I have no desire to make a name for myself by telling the story, and would not have responded to anyone claiming to know the story. But come on, this just wasn't even close. If you choose not to believe me, fine, that's up to you. Is this a bluff? Well, to bluff, you must have something to gain. What would I gain? The satisfaction of being correct? Knowing that people on this newsgroup, whom I will never meet, might respect me more? Who cares? All I want to do is let people know that when they read about someone who reveals the plot, don't believe them. There's a 99% chance that it's a fake. That's all. greg reynolds wrote in message ...

you

land

further

four

is

with

These

cast!

the

Tony Solis wrote in message ...

not

Let's see..... the cast is sworn to secrecy. The crew is sworn to secrecy. And NBC executives are sworn to secrecy.

And in the attempt to keep a secret, someone makes the incredibly LOGICAL move of telling a REPORTER about the contents of the script. No, wait, they let the reporter READ the script. How must this source come up with this idea? ("Hmmm...I know it's a secret, but I have to tell someone. It's killing me inside. I'll just tell someone who I can trust not to let the secret slip. Someone who could not blow my cover.... I know! A reporter!! I'll show the script to an entertainment writer, who can easily alert the public!")

C'mon. If you're really a reporter/writer, on what conditions were you shown the script? I doubt you even know the terms that are used by reporters to describe such conditions. (off the record, on the record, background, deep background? there ya go, it's multiple choice for you now...you can stake some claim to legitimacy by guessing the right one to describe how your hands are tied in revealing the plot.)

If you really are a reporter/writer, your readers deserve better than someone who can be so easily duped into believing in a false script.

You posed yourself in front of this news group to gain notoriety that you knew something we did not. We are fans and entitled to speculate. You took a power position and told a fan that he could do better than that which he had just done. You have our attention. You proclaim you are an entertainment writer and something of an insider who knows the final episode. I say you do not know this plot and are voluntarily portraying yourself as something you are not. Maybe a hundred people know the plot, but they are not inflicting negatives on this newsgroup for their own gain, as you did. You are not a lawyer, a priest, or a spouse, so you have no secret clemency. You said you know the plot. I say you do not. Declare your knowledge, or admit you were stretching the truth, a perfectly Seinfeld thing to do. What follows will either be: Tony Solis' rendition of the plot, or Tony Solis' plea bargain. He started it.

Tony Solis wrote:

Right on Greg, give it to him. This is the best banter I've read in this NG in quite a while.

And Tony, if you are what you say you are, how about a morsel, just one line of dialogue, that isn't too much to ask to prove yourself.

I agree - great job Greg! I couldn't have said (wrote) it better myself.

Tony - I won't ask you to reveal your source or even any of the dialogue from the final episode but how about telling us about your credentials? Who do you write for? What publications have you been in? I'm sure you won't respond to this but next time you try to brag it might be a good idea to back yourself up with some facts.

edge wrote in article ...

Ok, so you don't want to give away the plot...fine; but how about giving us ONE piece of info, such as a line of dialogue, so that you can be verified. Huh?

BG

BG- if you must know, Robin Mirsky appears playing herself, and she sets up Jerry's final line: "Miss Mirsky how could you do this to me??"

Paul52751 wrote:

I heard Jerry's last line was; "That's a shame."

I heard, you heard, he heard, she heard. Its completly irrelevant becuase no one knows.

Regular Seinfeld viewers will get the joke.

Tony Solis wrote in article ...

you

Would you like some catsup for your crow?

That is so terrible...you didn't take very long to think that up did you?

In article , "Josh Frazee" wrote:

Actually, I did no thinking at all. I simply relayed facts. Believe the plot or not. Judge it as you will, I did not write it.

yo einstein, you forgot to mention the part where monkeys fly out of Newman's butt.

I'm surprised that our troll friend DAVID H. hasn't claimed to know the "real" Seinfeld ending!

well, that really sucks

UM GUYS - I hate to tell you this bcuz it makes a lot of you look like fools -

But this guy was RIGHT!!!!!

I sat back and told the final episode plotline, of which my friends said I was rambling - especially that wacky Massachusetts idea I had - and well, this person knew it a week ago!!

Give him some credit for the info (how morbid and disappointing it was) - then ask him how he knew it....

Sean

K. Kispert wrote in message ...

Yada yada yada....

So, the bigh question is:

Will Tony Solis ("Mr Entertainment Writer") explain how he was so incredibly wrong?

Will K. Kispert explain how he was so incredibly right?

:-)

Nice call!!!