Viewers discuss whether the nude scenes in "The Apology" were poorly executed due to visible wardrobe pieces like towels or pasties covering the actors, with most disagreeing that this was noticeable.
Was I the only one who noticed Jerry and his Latest's clothing when they were nude? I would think their production values (or camera work?) would be better. A few times I could see a towel, or shorts or pasties or something like that covering them up. I mean, of course they weren't really nude, but we were supposed to believe they were...
MS
[email] wrote:
I thought it seemed okay... maybe I just wasn't looking hard enough. ;)
On Mon, 15 Dec 1997 14:59:31 GMT, [email] wrote:
Man, did you watch this episode in superslow-motion to catch that? I have seen the episode 3 times now and haven't noticed any towel or shorts or anything.
On Mon, 15 Dec 1997 14:59:31 GMT, [email] wrote:
Man, did you watch this episode in superslow-motion to catch that? I have seen the episode 3 times now and haven't noticed any towel or shorts or anything.
I agree with the original poster, now I don't claim to have the sharpest eyes but I could CLEARLY see the flesh colored clothes!! It was not something that required slo-motion at all, whenever the camera panned down a little too far you could see the accessories. Maybe you need a bigger tv? :)
Thanks, Chris. The only time I used slow-mo was for PA Lee's "naked" monologue on SNL. :)
MS
On Thu, 18 Dec 1997 09:05:52 -0700, Chris Myden wrote:
The same thing is visible in the "Hamptons" episode, the one where George's girlfriend goes topless. While still wearing her bikini top you can see a flesh colored band-aid looking thing sticking out. Later, when she stands topless in front of Elaine, Jerry and Kramer you can see the side of her breast covered by the "band-aid."
"Accessories", huh? Don't think I've ever heard them called that before.