Backwards Episode Comment

S09E08 The BetrayalretroDec 19, 19974 weeks later3 posts by 3 posters
😐 Mixed🔥 Controversial

Viewers debate the merits of the backwards episode, with mixed reactions on whether the reverse chronology format was clever storytelling or distractingly gimmicky.

3 posts
Xtcr7

Hello. I've just added alt.tv.seinfeld to my newsgroup. I'd like to post a letter I sent to amy the tv gal on aol when she was having a Seinfeld discussion. It basically discusses the "Backwards Episode" (I'm sure all of you have discussed this to death by now, but I hope you don't mind one more opinion), plus a couple of other points.

...I actually like SEINFELD quite a bit. I agree many aspects are, as you say, "over the top", but if they weren't, it probably would be a chore to get through. Put another way, the show isn't really about "nothing" anymore. During the SEINFELD CHRONICLES period, the show was about nothing, and they weren't that good. Take for example the Chinese restaurant episode (not sure if that was a CHRONICLES per se, but it's close enough). That was ponderous, lumbering; watching three people wait for a seat in a busy restaurant was exactly like waiting for a seat in a busy restaurant- i.e., it sucked (and by the way, Kramer wasn't in that episode, and if you ever wanted to see how valuable Mike Richards is to that show, juxtapose it with any Kramer-filled episode...you'd be amazed). SEINFELD is basically a show that explores everyday, prosaic occurences through a filter of Marx Bros./Monkees-like antics, and it needs this filter to keep an audience entertained; there's just no way around it.

I'd like to, however, make special mention of SEINFELD at its lowest: last Thursday's so-called BACKWARDS EPISODE. It was horrible, it was repugnant, but worse...it was arrogant. I happen to dabble in the whole spec manuscript thing, and it slays me that the writers at the show, who are probably the beneficiaries of nepotistic/cronyistic grails, had the nerve to invert the laws of comedic physics by presenting the punchlines first and then the setups? Why did they automatically think that editing the scenes from back to front was just so SEINFELD? It doesn't make any sense, it seems like a neophytic knee-jerk reaction. They apparently are so daunted by the prospects of the malefic demigod known as "the Sweeps" that they felt they had to do something really wacky. Guess what...it was really sucky. And the whole India setup...it was silly, even for SEINFELD. But, hey, what do I know? Those writers eat better than I do, so I guess I'm the loser. I'll just send my spec scripts out and have them returned in their puke-brown manila envelopes, knowing that next sweeps period SEINFELD and its writers will do yet another arrogant gimmick-episode which would've been better off in an arena like David Letterman's show (remember when he had the revolving show which did a 360? Stuff like going backwards works in that type of medium, but not in situation comedy) while I remain unoptioned.

Oh well...I'll still watch the show, I guess. It is good...just watch out for the hubris!

O GOOD POINTS. I too hated the backwards episode - it was TERRIBLY distracting and annoying and reflecting on the dialogue and the premise, it might have been pretty funny had they done it in the conventional fashion. I always enjoy the episodes when the O Henry heiress is featured.

I read an interview with Seinfeld somewhere where he discussed the premise of the show and how it was initially modeled on the Abbott & Costello television show and having been a devout fan of the A&C show, I agree. All the characters on past Seinfelds could have been on A&C.

It feels as if the writers are exploring a Bizarro Jerry World. I don't like Bizarro Jerry World. Maybe in place of the Superman model, he should display a Bizarro Superman next to it. That would be really weird, but a certain tipoff.

_____________________________ In article , [email] (Xtcr7) wrote:

the laws

setups? Why

my spec

like David

__________________________________________________

"who made coffee?"

ANTISPAM MANEUVER - to send email remove the "F" and send to: [email]
SMS or AASXtcr7

I disagree- they didn't JUST EDIT the episode backwards- they wrote it to be backwards to begin with. All the setups and all the jokes are very carefully planned out- I wish I had time to hook up my VCRs and make an edit of it forward- I bet it wouldn't work at all. It was a very clever, interesting idea that demonstrates a comprehension of how to set up punch lines, etc.