My 12 year old kid was on my computer when i was at work and started trouble. i was very upset when i learned that was my computer that sent that message across i am very sorry for his actions i grounded him for a week for that and he is not going to be useing a computer till he is old anough to bye his own i hope every body that read that message can read this i am very respected in other groups like multimedia most people now i am not like that i do contribute to news groups i hope you can except my apoligy i do like shows like futurama and simsons again he wont be bothering this group again and no other group nether
any body that red Futurama sucks please read
Apr 9, 199915 posts by 10 postersalt.tv.futurama
15 posts
rogcom lied:
Just 'cause I had some time to kill, I checked out the Dejanews posting profile for [email]:
Posts Newsgroup ----- --------- 9 alt.tv.futurama 4 alt.config 3 alt.binaries.multimedia.d 1 alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d
Very respected? After 4 posts?? Um, ok.
Read on. Here's an excerpt from "Daddy"s post in the binaries group:
Same lowercase proper pronoun, same missing punctuation, very interesting.
Here's another alt.binaries.multimedia.d post from "rogcom"
So. What can we conclude?
Either Daddy is an ablosute idiot who somehow managed to teach his own 12-year-old son to write just as poorly as he does, or "rogcom" *is* the 12-year-old techie wannabe who lies through his teeth. but then he's talking about $150 sound cards, so the third possibility is he's an adult with the education of a 12-year-old (or less? no offense to youngsters with an intellect.)
Guess where the smart money's going?
Nice try. loser.
*PLONK*
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[email]
(Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE* I am not responsible for equipment damage due to reeeealy
dumb children with no parental supervision, and access to a hammer.In article , [email] says...
Sir... I think you should do a "little" more research before you call someone a liar. I, for one, can vouch for "rogcom" as he is a REGULAR poster in alt.binaries.multimedia. I don't know what the problem was with your search on the "dejanews" posting profile,but rogcom has posted HUNDREDS of articles in the multimedia group.
Everyone there holds him in high respect. And no, I do not know him personally, I just know him from the multimedia group. (He has been posting there ever since I started hanging around in there several months ago.)
All he was trying to do was to apologize for his son's actions (which he did NOT have to do by the way) and he ended up getting criticised in the process....
-WingNut-
I did plenty of research. And I'm calling you a liar too.
There's no history of him there before this week.
Don't poo-poo Dejanews. It's an archive of all Usenet posts. And it helps me see you are both liars. You may even be the same person.
There's no record of you there before this week either. Hmmmm.
Liar.
*PLONK*
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[email]
(Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE* I am not responsible for equipment damage due to reeeealy
dumb children with no parental supervision, and access to a hammer.Dave wrote:
Deja News has been having some _serious_ problems in the last week or two, so don't implicitly trust anything you get from there right now. I'm not sure if their problems would actually impact on a search of the nature that you did, but for corroboration; try doing a search for your own history, for instance.
CountV
In article , [email] says...
When did you switch from AOL, yesterday? Because it obvious that you don't know too much of what your talking about.
poo-poo ? Jeez...
If you would stroll on over to news.admin.net-abuse.usenet and look for the Subject: Usenet Posting Summary (Fri, 09 Apr 1999 04:01:44 CDT) Read this article !!
If your not familiar with what this service is, (and I assume you don't), It is a service that COUNTS postings to usenet. Only the heaviest Usenet posters make this list. (It's not a spam list, it only counts the posts).
In case your news server is one of the crappy ones, I copied the article below. Take a look how made number 49 on the list. Rogcom. He posted 82 articles and over 50 Gigs of data. Does your "DejaNews" report that? Didn't think so.
But you should be congratulated for your stupidity, as you've earned the right to be placed in my "killfile".
I refuse to get into a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent...
-WingNut-
___
This data has been gathered by sol.net Network Services as part of an ongoing project to monitor Usenet trends and abuse.
The data presented in this report is generated from data gathered by the DSRS Posting Research Service. Access to this service is free and is available to any individual or organization involved in the fight against Usenet abuse, including spam cancellers, Kenny-killers, ISP abuse desks, and Usenet administrators. It is not a free news- reading service. Please visit the URL http://dsrs.nntp.sol.net for more details.
There are currently two items scanned:
- "From:" header
- "NNTP-Posting-Host:" header, if present
All articles sharing the same header (i.e. all articles with a "From:" header of "[email]") are counted together, with a summary of the number of posts, bytes posted, and BI. Only articles that have a BI of 20 or greater are summarized.
Please remember that BI is a general formula to measure the number of groups posted to in a manner which favors crossposting. The fact that the posts of a single poster may have a BI of 20 does not imply that the articles are spam, as each article may have been completely different and unrelated.
The Al Geiersbach "Duh, I Still Don't Get It" Paragraph:
For the completely dense among us, who are unable to grasp the obvious, that means that this isn't a "spam list". It also does not mean that your posts are being cancelled, filtered, or anything else... on the other hand, it doesn't mean that they're not. This service merely counts 'em.
(A memorial to a dunce who just refused to "get it" even after it was explained to him in excruciating detail, repeatedly, over the period of about a year. It's still not a spam report, Al, even if you desperately want to think so.)
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Automated data gathering mechanisms have collected the data presented in this report.
While this information is considered to be relatively reliable, it should be noted that problems do occur and the data gathered and reported might not actually represent an accurate picture of reality.
#include <bsd_disclaimer.h>
This information is provided by the author "as is" and any express or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose are disclaimed. In no event shall the author be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, exemplary, or consequential damages (including, but not limited to, procurement of substitute goods or services; loss of use, data, or profits; or business interruption) however caused and on any theory of liability, whether in contract, strict liability, or tort (including negligence or otherwise) arising in any way out of the use of this information, even if advised of the possibility of such damage.
And so on, and so forth. Now, here's the music.
Top From sorted by BI-sum
Rank BI Posts Bytes Data ---- ---------- ------- ----------- ------------ 1 6154.428 3761 8752901 [email] 2 5780.401 2190 6121645 [email] (Recruiters OnLine Network -RON) 3 1995.425 1411 9405896 Astro Roadkill 4 673.163 476 4568765 Cosmo Roadkill 5 592.000 592 7425423 lrodea2@*spam*home.com (Troggladite) 6 547.300 387 2005606 [email] 7 421.436 149 176015 Planet Recruit International 8 376.000 376 315740 [email] 9 371.939 263 118422579 *@*.com (Albatros) 10 310.228 103 244406 "HeadHunter.NET" 11 303.827 75 116887 [email] (Decision Strategies, Inc.) 12 285.591 180 534116 [email] 13 285.000 285 264481 Jennifer Williams 14 232.000 232 90287277 [email] (N E O) 15 187.000 187 82922690 [email] 16 185.548 109 331185 [email] (AFP) 17 185.262 131 61294751 [email] (Ethel Sue) 18 183.000 183 482721 [email] (see.ad.content) 19 177.164 171 656031 Anonymous 20 176.000 176 444838 [email] (Commerce Business Daily) 21 150.533 70 176658 [email] (jcookinc) 22 150.000 150 23229665 [email] 23 147.581 66 215983 [email] (****Paul May) 24 142.244 91 70579 [email] 25 137.000 137 6767260 "Judy" 26 136.875 74 3506990 "Slutty Suzy19" 27 133.000 133 8085048 [email] (jake) 28 132.000 132 205962 Rich Mulvania 29 130.108 92 42050896 [email] (Smokey Joe) 30 127.000 127 55936988 [email] (KephreN) 31 118.000 118 228681 [email] (Fredric L. Rice) 32 116.000 116 9090183 [email] 33 114.000 114 53601269 [email] (Stickweed) 34 111.000 56 114073 "Norberta" 35 108.000 108 49709814 [email] (boddah) 36 107.000 107 42171766 [email] (Agent 1.0/32.397) 37 106.790 66 107911 [email] 38 101.000 101 373048 [email] (Debunks) 39 96.272 40 2879403 [email] 40 96.000 96 3378346 [email] 41 95.000 95 37918704 [email] ([Bubbaman]) 42 89.000 89 171438 Top Echelon Network of Recruiters 43 86.000 86 7336110 Anna 44 86.000 86 9166654 [email] (JB NoSpam) 45 85.000 85 75331 Becky 46 84.000 84 38123166 "= GameGuru! =" 47 82.024 58 17770144 [email] (remove the 'X's to contact me) 48 82.000 82 50947839 [email] (rogcom) 49 82.000 82 46948434 [email] (�t��ig �) 50 81.000 81 33536504 [email] (�corpio) 51 80.443 59 15806194 Cephus 52 80.000 80 2103190 [email] (BinoR) 53 78.000 78 246203 [email]... (DeppityBob) 54 76.518 29 174879 "Philip Lewis" 55 73.539 52 21431132 [email] (NuQ)
I wonder why Trinity didn't make the list? ;)
Perhaps dejanews doesn't keep a complete record of binary postings, as this would require WAY too much storage space? Just trying to help....
Boy I really hate to nit pick in the face of an appology, but your kid's grammar is better than yours. You typed a whole paragraph that is one runon sentence, no punctuation, no capital I for the pronoun, and misuse of BYE instead of BUY. Misuse AND misspelling of Nether.....it goes on and on.
But appology well accepted. Don't get me wrong. I just tend to be a suspicious alluicious sometimes.
If you're gonna nitpick someone's spelling, you should probably run you own post through a spellchecker first.
Apology. :)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[email]
(Hammer nail here--> <-- for a new monitor.)
Seinfeld FAQ http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7217/faq.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE* I am not responsible for equipment damage due to reeeealy
dumb children with no parental supervision, and access to a hammer.On Fri, 9 Apr 1999 08:59:22 -0400, "WAV King" wrote:
I am a carpender what do you expect but any way thank you for excepting my appology
ok now i totally dont believe you!
the professor
Your _apology_ is certainly excepted.
Not accepted, but definitely excepted.
ever so sincerely, Reznik the Great and Powerful (pay no attention to that man behind the curtain)
"If toast always lands butter-side down,
and cats always land on their feet,
what happens if you strap toast on
the back of a cat and drop it?"
-=Steven Wright=-"Only two things are infinite,
the universe and human stupidity,
...and I'm not sure about the former"
-= Albert Einstein =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Twin Peaks -- COMPLETE
http://www.iosin.com/twinpeaks
updated April 1999
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Twin Peaks 1999
"It is happening, again"
http://www.iosin.com/twinpeaks/tp99.htm
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=Not insulting you or anything, but, you spell bad..........
Boy I really hate to nit pick in the face of an appology *apology* , but your kid's grammar is better than yours. You typed a whole paragraph that is one runon *run-on* sentence, no punctuation, no capital I for the pronoun, and misuse of BYE instead of BUY. Misuse AND misspelling of Nether *neither*.....it goes on and on. *yes, it does*
But appology *as above* well accepted. Don't get me wrong. *sentence fragment* I just tend to be a suspicious alluicious *aloysius* sometimes.